Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0120
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/29/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/30/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N STONE AVENUE Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: November 30, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP16-0120 LAS SOMBRAS TENTATIVE PLAT 2ND * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 12/07/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/07/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Tentative Plat for Las Sombras Subdivision, lots 1 - 22 and Common Areas A - C Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0120 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 7, 2016, DUE DATE: December 22, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July15, 2017. 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 11: Review sheet 5 for the correct lot type listed. Some of the lot type designations do not match the lot type designation on the Lot Area Table on the cover sheet and some of the lot type designations are not labeled. Revise the sheet 5 as required. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: Include typical fully dimensioned "lot" detail drawings depicting the proposed building setbacks. The detail drawing shall include interior, boundary and interior street building setbacks. Based on the number of units proposed, the ADT is greater than 140 but less than 1,000. Draw and label the interior street building setbacks for both the dwelling and garage setbacks. See UDC Section 6.4 for information related to the Rules of Measurement. (See Comment 16 for additional info on street perimeter setbacks.) 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 3: The previous comment is still applicable until reduction request is addressed by the PDSD Director. 2-06.5.3.A. Reduced Perimeter Yards Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; PREVIOUS COMMENT 3: It is clear that the interior building setbacks are not consistent and may not meet the minimum requirements for developing area setbacks. However, if the proposed staggered street building setbacks are to show an enhanced architectural design, the following will be required. The street setback may be administratively reduced by the PDSD Director based on a finding that the reduced setback enhances the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and a transportation statement is approved by the City's Traffic Engineering division. A street perimeter yard reduction request is considered for approval concurrent with the processing of the plat or site plan , whichever is applicable. Also, explain what mitigation will be provided for lots that do not have an 18-foot driveway in front of the garage or 19 feet from the back of the sidewalk. How will the development keep owners from parking vehicles in front of garages/carports that would overlap onto the pedestrian path on lots that do not have an 18 or 19 foot parking area as noted above? (CC&R's, notes on TP restricting parking for certain lots?) 2. Follow Up To Previous PMP Comment: The note with the lot numbers listed by the Design Professional for PMP, Lots 11, 12, 15, 16, will provide No Balconies and Translucent or Clerestory windows at the second floor level could not be verified on the DP. Clarify if the note is supposed to be listed on the cover sheet or is it listed on another sheet of the DP. 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows: 1. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that a PMP document has been submitted for review by the design professional. See the design professional's comments. List and incorporate on the TP any conditions applicable to the PMP. 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; 2. COMMENT: In the PMP, Response 1, states "Lots 11, 12, 15 and 16 - No Balconies and Opaque Window Film will be required on the 2nd floor, south facing rear elevation". Lots 15 and 16 are adjacent to R-2 zoned property with a single family development, Privacy Mitigation shall be provided. (See the Design Professional comments related to the South building elevation.) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/09/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP16-0120 Las Sombras Subdivision Lot 1-22/2nd Submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. As discussed with the applicant, the street names will be “W Micha Pl” and “N Meg Pl”. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 12/13/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: December 14, 2016 DUE DATE: December 22, 2016 SUBJECT: New Subdivision/FLD TO: Kevin M. Hall, PE LOCATION: 301 W Pastime Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0120 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per previous comment 7 and TSM 7-01.4.1D sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along any adjacent street. Please show connectivity between onsite sidewalk and the sidewalk proposed along Pastime road. Per TSM 10-01.2.7A the sidewalk is required on both sides of the street. 2) Per previous comment 8 and TSM 7-01.4.3E, TSM 10-01.3.3B and TSM 10-01.2.8 the sidewalk connection between the onsite sidewalk and the offsite proposed sidewalk must pass the 10 year storm underneath it. Please provide a scupper instead of the curb opening called out by keynote 25 on sheet 3. This is where a sidewalk will need to connect. 3) Per previous comment 10 reconfigure ramp called out by keynote 22 to accept the pedestrian access from both directions. This means both along the south side of E Past Time Road and going south into the subdivision along the west side of Magan's Way. 4) Per previous comment 20 and section 12.2.1, item 1 of the drainage standards manual (UDC 7.14.4) please provide calculations to show that the 10 year flood is contained within the curb of the street. The calculations provided in Appendix E of the drainage report for Megan's Way show an inverted crown. Detail 1/10 shows a cross slope for this street section. Please update accordingly. 5) Per previous comment 21 and Section 12.2.1, item 3 of the drainage standards manual (UDC 7.14.4) please provide calculations to show that the 100 year street flow is at least 1 foot below the finished floor elevations. There is concern that the finished floor elevations for lots 1 to 4 may not be a full one foot above the upstream 100 year street flow elevations. The calculations provided in Appendix E of the drainage report for Megan's Way show an inverted crown. Detail 1/10 shows a cross slope for this street section. Please update accordingly. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 12/20/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/21/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/21/2016 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Condition 1: Any future development on any more than two of the existing lots 9, 10, 13, or 14, in which the existing structures are demolished or replaced, will require an AVP relative to those lots and any adjacent effected adjacent lots in regard to… 1) Provision of alternate model plan elevations in accordance with UDC 8.7.3.M.1.c. (2). 2) And garage placement as defined in UDC 8.7.3.M.1.c. (3)… no more 50% of the detached units are to be flush or project from the front wall living area. |
| 12/22/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the 2nd submittal of the Tentative Plat for Las Sombras subdivision submitted on 11/29/16. If you have any questions, please contact me at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent II Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 12/22/2016 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/07/2017 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |