Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0106
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/02/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 12/02/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/13/2016 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | PD16-0106/ IID-16-03 Comments 1. Drawings comprised of Development Plan Package dated 12/01/2016. 3 sheets. 2. Sidewalk width has been reduced to 7’ wide. This was previously indicated as 8’ wide. The existing sidewalk is 13’ wide and is being reconfigured to accommodate restaurant seating. Per the discussion with the applicant at the August 29, 2016 pre-application meeting the sidewalk is an important urban design component and 8’ is a reasonable minimum width. It should not be further reduced. 3. Regarding the Streetscape Shading requirement, I don’t think it’s a problem but I haven’t seen any documentation. 4. Requests in July 24, COT Planning & Development Services letter regarding the Development Package review that do not appear to have been addressed: a. provide floor area and height of buildings (gross floor area of project is noted but not individual structures) b. provide first floor elevations 5. "Total Paved Area” of development is noted as “0”. This doesn’t seem correct — aren't Exterior Food Service and Exterior Service Yards paved? 6. Long Term Bicycle Parking requirement is noted as 6 spaces, with 0 spaces provided. This should be confirmed; I don’t remember what was finally agreed upon about this in the last meeting. 7. Note from Thomas Ryan re: waste collection — need to indicate frequency of waste collection. |
| 12/15/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principle Planner PROJECT: Corbett Brewery Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0106 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 15, 2016 Zoning conditionally approves the development package subject to the following; A temporary revocable easement (TRE) is required for the proposed seating located within the right-of-way. Zoning acknowledges that John Cahill has been contacted and the process has been started. A hold has been put on the certificate of occupancy for T16CM07773 until the TRE is completed. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/16/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/16/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Needs Review |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/16/2016 | LBOJORQ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |