Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0105
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/18/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: November 18, 2016 DUE DATE: December 1, 2016 SUBJECT: New Parking lot TO: Kevin Hall, PE LOCATION: 2870 N Oracle Road REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0105 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following item needs to be addressed and can be done by sending an email with a pdf or over the counter: 1) Per previous comment 10 and Land Code Section 25-43 please show the existing "curb cut" at the northwest corner off of Oracle to be closed. Currently it only says "curb" to be removed. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 11/21/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Beacon Group Parking Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0105 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 21, 2016 DUE DATE: December 1, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 29, 2017. 1. Follow up to Previous Comment 2: Clarify if the parking lot is in addition to the parking for the Beacon Group Use on the adjacent parcel or is the parking lot to be used for anyone who wishes to park on this lot? The Tax Parcel Combo must be completed prior to approval of the DP. Submit the signed Pima County Tax Parcel Combo documents or lot combo documents with the next DP submittal. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. PREVIOUS COMMENT 2: Due to the changes to the existing site and the cross access depicted, Zoning is requesting that a Pima County Tax Parcel combination be done prior to approval of the DP. The overall site area shall include the lots 2 and 3 and the existing site area of the existing development. The areas can be broken up into existing development site and new site areas. If the parking lot is designed to stand alone without vehicle or pedestrian cross access the DP can be revised to depict a stand alone "Parking Use". If the parking lot is to be built as depicted on the current DP, a Tax Parcel Combo will be required in addition to including the existing development on the DP along with all dimensional standards calculations and vehicle parking and land area expansion calculations. Keep in mind that land area or vehicle parking expansions could trigger additional regulations to the existing site. (The existing use went through a Development package review and approval in 2005 and most if not all of the development regulations are probably in compliance with current development regulations. 2. Follow up to Previous Comment 9: Provide the copies of the approved MS&R relief application with the next submittal of the DP. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: Oracle Road is listed as an arterial street on the Adopted MS&R map. The full R/W width for Oracle Road is 150 feet. Draw and label the future SVT at the Driveway entrance and draw and label the existing and future SVT for the corner of Oracle and Laguna. It appears that an additional 10 feet will be required for future widening. Draw, dimension and label the future curb, sidewalk, and street width. Dimension the future back of curb to PL and center line to PL. The area along the Oracle Road frontage should be designed to comply with the future R/W or a future site and landscape plan is required and will have to be recorded as part of an MS&R covenant. UDC 5.4.5.F If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 12/01/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | |
| 12/01/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.6.2.B.2 Based on the proposed expansion of vehicular use area the provisions UDC 7.6.4 apply to the entire site. The proposed parking lot appears to be part of or serve a larger project, which may be subject to code review. Provide calculations and plan revisions as necessary. 2) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the MS&R right-of-way line. Show the MS&R Right of Way on the appropriate plans. |