Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0105
Parcel: 10712183B

Address:
2870 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP16-0105
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
07/08/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
07/14/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: July 15, 2016
DUE DATE: July 29, 2016
SUBJECT: New Parking lot
TO: Kevin Hall, PE
LOCATION: 2870 N Oracle Road
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP16-0105
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0105).
2) Narrative in the Drainage Report refers to the 12:1 development area to water harvesting option. Please note that option is currently only intended to provide for 2 year threshold retention requirements and for a more stream lined plan review process when developments are less than 1 acre and not located in a balanced or critical basin.
3) The third paragraph on page 4 of the drainage report has a typo in it where it refers to "PSW1" when it should say "PWS1."
4) The narrative following the first set of curb opening calculations in Appendix E refers to proposing a 5' wide concrete curb opening when the preceding calculations calls for a 3' wide curb opening at this location. Please make corrections as appropriate.
5) The first paragraph of the Detention/Retention Section on page 5 of the drainage report indicates that the 5-year threshold retention requirement of 3,800 cubic feet must be met. Calculations found in appendix E only requires 1924.6 cubic feet of threshold retention. Please make corrections as appropriate. Please note that the 3,861 square feet of 6" depressed landscape area described in the next paragraph seems to be appropriate for this development.
6) The decomposed granite proposed for use in paving and grading note 24 is not recommended due to its tendency to clog soil pores and decrease infiltration. The use of mulch or compost is a best practice per page 15 of the City of Tucson Water Harvesting Manual. Discretion of the design professional is permitted.
7) Per AM 2-06.4.9H2 please show the sight visibility triangle from the PAAL entryway off of Laguna Street on sheet 3.
8) Per AM 2-06.4.9H1, TSM 10-01.3.2C and the City of Tucson Access Management Manual Section 5.7 (page 34) curb returns with a 25' radii are required for the entryway off of Oracle Road.
9) Per TSM 10-01.3.2F please provide wheel chair ramps at the entryway off of Oracle Road to accompany the required curb radii.
10) Per Land Code Section 25-43 please show the existing curb cut to be closed with bollards to be removed (via demolition keynote 12) just south of the northern most existing storm drain inlet callout on Oracle Road. Show this on sheet 6. Please note that the bollards are in conflict with both the 6" depressed water harvesting area. Sheet 7 shows some 5 gallon Cleveland sage that may be difficult to plant with some partially excavated bollards in the way.
11) The keynote callout near the southwest corner of the site appears to be offset slightly from what it is intended to refer to. Please adjust accordingly.
12) Per Section 5.11 of the City of Tucson Access Management Manual the Driveway Throat Length should be of sufficient length to enable the intersection of the driveway and abutting roadway and the on-site circulation to function without interference with each other. This requires an ability to turn around without backing into traffic if a vehicle turns into the driveway only to find the gate called out by keynote 20 on sheet 3 is closed. Please Discuss with Zelin Canchola at TDOT for approval of current or updated configuration.
13) In order for the center island water harvesting basins (67 cf + 67 cf + 290 cf = 424 cf) to be counted towards the required 5-year threshold retention requirement, there needs to be a way for the storm water runoff to be routed to and enter these basins. Please callout keynote 24 with appropriate widths at applicable locations. A reasonable area of hard surface should be routed to each required curb opening to provide threshold retention. A 12:1 ratio is considered acceptable.
14) Sheet 4 shows a finished grade of 41.81 in a 6" depressed water harvesting area where the inlets are at grades ranging from 40.51 to 40.91. Please adjust grades as needed to provide for the full required retention volume before the water harvesting basin overtops.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
07/20/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
07/20/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section
PROJECT:
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0105

TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 20, 2016

DUE DATE: July 29, 2016



COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 29, 2017.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0105, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

2. COMMENT: Due to the changes to the existing site and the cross access depicted, Zoning is requesting that a Pima County Tax Parcel combination be done prior to approval of the DP. The overall site area shall include the lots 2 and 3 and the existing site area of the existing development. The areas can be broken up into existing development site and new site areas.

If the parking lot is designed to stand alone without vehicle or pedestrian cross access the DP can be revised to depict a stand alone "Parking Use". If the parking lot is to be built as depicted on the current DP, a Tax Parcel Combo will be required in addition to including the existing development on the DP along with all dimensional standards calculations and vehicle parking and land area expansion calculations. Keep in mind that land area or vehicle parking expansions could trigger additional regulations to the existing site. (The existing use went through a Development package review and approval in 2005 and most if not all of the development regulations are probably compliance with current development regulations.


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

3. COMMENT: The use will depend on whether or not the parking lot is a stand alone parking lot or it will be an expansion of lot and vehicle parking area for the current Elementary and Secondary School Use (D05-0020).


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;
2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

4. COMMENT: This may be required based on the next submittal and whether or not the lots are combined. The information may be obtained from the approved DP - D05-0020.


2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

5. COMMENT: This standard must be addressed if the parking lot is not developed as a stand alone site.


2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

6. COMMENT: This standard above must be addressed if the parking lot is not developed as a stand alone site.


2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

7. COMMENT: This standard must be addressed if the parking lot is not developed as a stand alone site. The overall site development and boundary will have to be depicted and labeled.


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

8. COMMENT: If lots 2 and 3 are not combined with the current developed property, lots 2 and 3 will have to be combined. The boundary of the combined lots 2 and 3 will have to be labeled without the property line that is drawn 40 feet from the southern lot line of lot 3.


2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

9. COMMENT: Oracle Road is listed as an arterial street on the Adopted MS&R map. The full R/W width for Oracle Road is 150 feet. Draw and label the future SVT at the Driveway entrance and draw and label the existing and future SVT for the corner of Oracle and Laguna.

It appears that an additional 10 feet will be required for future widening. Draw, dimension and label the future curb, sidewalk, and street width. Dimension the future back of curb to PL and center line to PL.

The are along the Oracle Road frontage should be designed to comply with the future R/W or a future site and landscape plan is required and will have to be recorded as part of an MS&R covenant. UDC 5.4.5.F


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: Per IBC section 1106.1, - Where parking is provided, accessible parking spaces shall be provided in compliance with table 1106.1. Between 76 and 100 parking spaces provided, 4 shall be accessible spaces of which one must be a van accessible space, IBC section 1106.5. Assuming that the parking lot is a stand alone parking use four accessible spaces will be required with one being a van accessible space.

If the parcels are combined the number of accessible parking spaces can be calculated based on the total number of spaces existing and proposed. The number of van accessible spaces required will be based on the total number of accessible spacers provided, 1 van space for every 6 accessible spaces required or provided. Include on sheet five a dimensioned detail drawing of the Accessible / Van accessible parking stalls and access aisle.


2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.

Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

11. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.
2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

12. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the site plan. Once zoning has approved the DP site plan the grading plan is also approved unless changes are made to the grading plan that do not match the DP site plan.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

13. COMMENT: Label the cross and horizontal slopes for the sidewalk system on the site. It is not clear if the slopes noted on the grading plan are for the pavement only.


2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

14. COMMENT: The standard above may have to be addressed based on whether or not the lots are combined.


2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

15. COMMENT: See the Landscape reviewer comments related to landscape border and screening requirements.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
07/20/2016 DAVID RIVERA H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments.
07/26/2016 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) UDC 7.6.2.B.2 Based on the proposed expansion of vehicular use area the provisions UDC 7.6.4 apply to the entire site.

2) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.a Street landscape borders must be a minimum of ten feet wide as measured from the MS&R right-of-way line.

3) UDC 7.6.4.E All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved must be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with a layer of inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution.
Specify the type of treatment proposed for all areas of the site.

4) UDC 7.6.6.C.2 The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area.
07/28/2016 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change UDC 7.7.3 Submit a Native plant Preservation Plan.
07/29/2016 FRODRIG2 ADA REVIEW Passed PER CHRISTIE PIERCE

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/01/2016 LBOJORQ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed