Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0102
Parcel: 14025061A

Address:
5845 S PARK AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP16-0102
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/02/2018 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
01/08/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond Please address comments from previous review. Add notes to plans.
01/08/2018 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Passed It is the applicant's responsibility to obtain review and approval for wastewater from Pima County, sewer@pima.gov.
01/09/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP16-0102 Las Sombras Subdivision 01/29/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
(X) Denied
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018

COMMENTS

Site is addressed 5845 S Park Avenue and is currently being reviewed for DP16-0102. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Las Sombras Subdivision is subject to rezoning C9-14-06. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-14-06 verbatim on resubmittal of DP16-0102.
01/09/2018 ALEXANDRA HINES COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change Real Estate requests:

1) That the block labeling the "Excluding Area - per rezoning" on sheet C-3 include the C9- case #, also dimension the existing half RoW;

2) Existing half RoW on Park be dimensioned;

2) Applicant provide Real Estate a current title commitment for the parcel being developed;

3) Applicant execute the right-of-way dedication and consent(s) to dedicate which will be prepared by Real Estate prior to DP approval.

John

John Cahill
Real Estate Supervisor
City Dept. of Transportation
201 North Stone Av. 6th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6768
01/12/2018 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change ***The attachment can be viewed in documents table on PRO.***

DP16-0102 La Cima Market / 2nd Submittal is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

The attached pdf contains Addressing’s comments.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Official
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
01/24/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP16-0102 Las Sombras Subdivision 01/29/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
(X) Denied
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018

COMMENTS

Site is addressed 5845 S Park Avenue and is currently being reviewed for DP16-0102. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Las Sombras Subdivision is subject to rezoning C9-14-06. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-14-06 verbatim on resubmittal of DP16-0102.
01/24/2018 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change Notes under "SITE INFORMATION" on sheet C-1 indicate occupancy group R and no sprinklers. There are 4 sub groups of R occupancies, three of which require sprinklers. Please investigate and clarify.
01/29/2018 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP16-0102 Las Sombras Subdivision 01/29/2018

() Final Plat
(X) Development Plan
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations



SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() Approval
(X) Rezoning history on site
(X) Denied
() Annexation history on site
() No Rezoning history on site - No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
() Landscape Plan
() Other










REVIEWER: MM DATE: 01/29/2018

COMMENTS

Site is addressed 5845 S Park Avenue and is currently being reviewed for DP16-0102. Site has rezoning history to monitor per development package checklist, which indicates rezoning conditions do apply. Las Sombras Subdivision is subject to rezoning C9-14-06. Please provide and list rezoning conditions for C9-14-06 verbatim on resubmittal of DP16-0102.
01/31/2018 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Unified Development Code
2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
The landscape plan shall include the following:
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.
The following comments were not addressed from previous review:
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
C. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening elements on landscape plan.
7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION
7.7.3. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this section apply to all development as listed below.
A. New Development
Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or,
Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan.
Submit NPP plan or Application for Exception.
Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
New comment:
The following comments are for the commercial portion of proposed site

1. Applicability: All commercial development plans submitted after June 1, 2010.

2. A separate Water Harvesting Implementation Plan shall be submitted with all applications for new commercial developments where landscaping is required. The plan shall detail the landscape water demand and the harvested water supply needed to meet 50 percent of landscape demand.
01/31/2018 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Comment not acknowledged. [Second request: An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.]
2. Comment not addressed. [Second request: Revise the site drawing to include the location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Comment not addressed. [Second request: Correct the occupancy group shown on sheet C1 for the new commercial building (should be M for Mercantile) and the residential buildings (should be R3).]
01/31/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning review comments
01/31/2018 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: La Cima Market / Residential - 5845 S. Park Avenue
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP16-0102 - Rezoning Case C9-14-06 (O-3 to C-1 Authorized)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 31, 2018

DUE DATE: January 31, 2018

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 29, 2017.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

1. Follow Up To Previous Comment 1: This comment was not addressed as requested. Revise the Title blocks on sheets 10 through 18 to match the title block of the cover sheet and to include the same information.

2-06.3.4- A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 1: Assure that the title block of all plan sheets are consistent and include the same relevant information, revise as required.


2. Follow Up To Previous Comment 2: The approval stamp on sheets 10 through 18 was not placed as requested per the previous comment 2.

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

COMMENT 2: For consistency, locate the PDSD stamp next to the title block of all plan sheets.


3. Follow Up To Previous Comment 5: The location of the contour interval used could not be verified on sheet 5. The contour interval shall be listed under the north arrow.

2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

COMMENT 5: Label the contour interval on the appropriate sheets (Grading Sheet).


4. Follow Up To Previous Comment 6: The legend on the site plan sheet shall be expanded to include all line work used on the drawing; i.e., centerline, property line, utility lines etc, and any specific symbols used to describe this project.

Per the plan a private parking spaces is proposed in a striped area next to the west entrance. If a parking space is proposed in this location the striping shall be removed and a parking space designated as such is to be noted.


2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 6: Add the symbols legend as noted by the standard above.


5. Follow Up To Previous Comment 7: The sheet index listed on the cover sheet includes sheet names not consistent with the sheet names labeled in the title block of some of the sheets. Review the sheet index and label the sheets accordingly.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 7: Label the actual sheet numbers on the Drawing Index text block, see redlines.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

6. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: The information for Rene Martinez Flores was not included on the cover sheet. Add Rene's information along with the zip codes for Talavera Engineering and RMJR.

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 8: Revise the text block of all who that assisted in preparing this DP document. Names, mailing addresses, Email addresses, and Telephone numbers of every person must be listed on the cover sheet. The same information for all registrants that have sealed this document must be listed. Revise as required as noted by the standard above.


7. Follow Up To Previous Comment 9: The name of the project in the title block of all plan sheets shall be the same. Review and revise the name of the project to be consistent on all sheets.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: Add the name of the project in the title block of all plan sheets.


8. Follow Up To Previous Comment 10: The legal description noted in the title block of the cover sheet shall be listed in the title block of all plan sheets.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: Include in the title block of all plan sheets, brief legal description "located in the SW1/4, NE1/4, NW1/4 of Section 7 T15, R14"


9. Follow Up To Previous Comment 8: List the appropriate sheet number and number of sheets in the title of all plan sheets. Some of the sheets are missing the sheet numbers, some are numbered with number that are not in the sheet index. Review the title blocks of all plan sheets and revise as required.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

PREVIOUS COMMENT 11: All the sheets in the DP must be sequentially numbered i.e., 1 of 18, 2 of 18 etc. The sheets from U-1 to the last sheet have not been numbered. Revise as required.


10. Follow Up To Previous Comment 12: The development Package case number DP16-0102 shall be listed in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets. Assure that the case number is listed on all the plans sheets.

The administrative street address shall be listed in the lower right corner next to the title block of all plan sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 12: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0102, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List next to the title block of all plan sheets the administrative address of the site.

List next to the title block of all plan sheets the rezoning case number C9-14-06. If applicable any additional case numbers that apply to this development must also be listed.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.


11. Follow Up To Previous Comment 15: This comment was not addressed as requested per the previous comment. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 15: This site is to be developed with Retail and Residential components (Multi-use) two principle uses. Revise the "Proposed Use" note on all sheets as follows; Proposed Use - Retail Trade Use Group Food and Beverage Sales Subject to UDC Section 4.9.13.0 and Residential Use Group - Multifamily Development.


12. Follow Up To Previous Comment 16: This comment was not addressed as requested per the previous comment.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 16: The conditions of rezoning must be listed on the DP on the cover sheet or the site plan sheet. As part of the re-submittal documents, include a separate response memo stating how all the rezoning conditions will be met and/or demonstrate on the DP compliance with the rezoning conditions.


13. Follow Up To Previous Comment 18: The previous comment was not addressed as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

PREVIOUS COMMENT 18: Both the proposed uses are not subject to lot coverage requirements. Remove all calculations related to lot or site coverage and FAR.

List the allowed height of 18 feet per rezoning condition 13 and the proposed height of the retail building and the residential buildings.


14. Follow Up To Previous Comment 19: The previous comment was not addressed as requested. Remove any verbiage that relates to site/lot coverage and FAR.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 19: This project is to be developed in two phases. Phase I is for the retail component and Phase II will be the residential component. Clearly revise the phase calculations representative of the use and land area that will be utilized for that use. In other words the residential component will utilize X-number of square feet for the development this is the square footage that should be used for the density calculation which still applies. Lot or site coverage does not apply for either use so remove any reference to lot coverage and floor area ratio (FAR). See redlines.


15. Follow Up To Previous Comment 20: The Previous Comment was not addressed as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents:
"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

PREVIOUS COMMENT 20: Add the Drainage note to the cover sheet as noted by the standard above


16. Follow Up To Previous Comment 21: The previous comment was not addressed as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes
2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

PREVIOUS COMMENT 21: Add the note to the cover sheet as noted by the standard above.


17. Follow Up To Previous Comment 22: It is not clear that the previous comment was addressed. Address the comment and draw and label any easement on the property.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 22: If applicable draw and label all existing easements on the property. The location width and type of easement along with the recordation info must be labeled.


18. Follow Up To Previous Comment 23: Per Rezoning condition 25, additional right of way in accordance with the MS&R plan is required along Park Avenue. This project must be designed with the future right of way depicted. Remove line work that applies to the current right of way conditions. Draw, dimension and label the new property line, new curb and sidewalk along the Park Avenue frontage adjacent to this property. All site sheets will be depicted correctly. The dedication recording information must be labeled on the site plan sheet and as a general note.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 23: Label the dimension of the future curb and sidewalk from the future property line along Park Avenue. Label the width of the future sidewalk for Park Avenue.


19. Follow Up To Previous Comment 24: Draw and label the Phase line that demonstrates that each phase can stand alone. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on how the phasing is proposed.

2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 24: It is not clear how the phase I development will allow for the refuse truck to maneuver in and out of the site if the driveway system is not all constructed in Phase I. Demonstrate how Phase can stand alone.


20. Follow Up To Previous Comment 25: The previous comment was not addressed. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 25: Demonstrate how the circulation will comply within the Phase I development.


21. Follow Up TO Previous Comment 27: Revise the parking calculation for the residential use to state that 14 parking spaces are required and 14 are provided.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 27: Revise the parking calculations to state two parking spaces per dwelling based on a two bedroom per dwelling. Replace the word "furnished" with "Provided".


22. Follow Up To Previous Comment 28: list the number of long and short term bicycle facilities provided under the bicycle parking calculation for both uses. The long term facilities for the residential use could not be verified on the site plan sheet. Draw and label the long term facility for the residential use.

Include a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the long term bicycle parking facilities. The detail depicting the short term bicycle racks next to the building does represent the actual location as depicted on the site plan sheet. Provide a detail drawing of the actual location or draw and label the main public entrance to the retail building and label the distance from the short term facility to that entrance.

Indicate by note, how or where the overhead lighting will be provided for the retail use long term bicycle parking facility.

It also appears that 2nd Short Term bicycle facilities has been provided for the residential use but was not listed in the bicycle parking calculations. Address as required.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 28: Review the bicycle parking calculations for the retail and residential uses and list the correct number of parking spaces required for both uses separately.

Add a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the long term facility for both uses.


23. Follow Up To Previous Comment 29: The previous comment was not addressed. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 29: Add the information as noted by the standard above.


24. Follow Up To Previous Comment 30: The previous Comment was not addressed. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 30: Dedication is required per rezoning condition 25. The dedication must be recorded under separate instrument. The recordation information must be listed on the DP and completed before approval of the DP.


25. Follow Up To Previous Comment 32: assure that any changes made to the base site plan are also made to the grading plan sheets.

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.
2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 32: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the DP site plan. Once zoning has approved the DP the grading plan is also approved by zoning. Assure that any changes that are made to the base site plan are made to the Grading, Landscape and other site sheets.


26. Follow Up To Previous Comment 33: The previous Comment was not addressed. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 33: There are no setback requirements from the retail use to the adjacent properties to the north C-1 one or the south O-3 zone. There is no setback requirement from the residential development (which is considered non-residential due to the number of dwellings proposed) adjacent to the west property O-3 zone but there is a building setback requirement adjacent to the east property which is zoned R-2. The minimum building setback is 1½ times the height of the wall facing the property line. The required setback of 18 feet is required based on the proposed building height of 12 feet. Revise the building setback or a Design development option (Setback variance) will be required.


27. Follow Up To Previous Comment 34: See redline on sheet 3 for this comment; the portion of the walkway between the SFR and Duplex 3 must be concrete and physically separated from the PAAL. Revise as required.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 34: Clarify if the section of the sidewalk from the street to the retail building is physically separated from the vehicular use area. If not the sidewalk must be raised or some form of permanent physical barrier must be provided, see redlines.

Label the longitudinal slopes for all proposed sidewalks based on the grading plan grades.


28. Follow Up To Previous Comment 36: The previous comment was not addresses as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 36: As noted in a comment above, demonstrate how the conditions of rezoning have been addressed. Also a separate response memo must be included in the next submittal explaining how conditions of the rezoning case C9-14-06 have been addressed.


29. Follow Up To Previous Comment 37: The previous comment was not addresses as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 37: Demonstrate on the plan how mail will be provided.


30. Follow Up To Previous Comment 38: The previous comment was not addresses as requested. Address the comment as required.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

PREVIOUS COMMENT 38: Add a note that all signage will be permitted under separate permit.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

31. COMMENT: Review the plan and check revise typos, leader line locations etc and revise as required.

32. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to the zoning comments and the changes to the DP plans.

33. It is clear that most of the zoning comments were not addressed. It is also clear that there are multiple people working on this plan. However the memos submitted and supposed to address the zoning comments were incomplete. One memo states to see RMJR comment letter and the RMJR comment letter states that it is N/A. The next submittal shall include a comprehensive response memo from the main registrant detailing clearly how the zoning review comments have been addressed. The main registrant shall also include a comprehensive response memo detailing how the conditions of rezoning have been addressed.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, Contact David Rivera on Tuesday or Wednesday at (520) 837-4957 or by email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov or contact Steve Shields any time during the week at (520) 837-4956 or email Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and all requested comprehensive documents
02/13/2018 JVWINKL1 ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1st submittal comments still to be addressed
1) Map Tucson Shows the soils on this site to be Type D Soils. The Hydrologic calculations in the drainage report assume type B Soils. Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 14.2, item 6 and UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, Item 5 a soils report is needed to show infiltration rate for a drainage basin in type D soils over 6 inches deep. Per Tucson Code 26-2 (retention) a safety factor of 2 shall be applied before calculating the required 12 hour drain down time required by UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, Item 3a. The City, State, zip code and email addresses are required for all of the subcontracors listed on the cover sheet per AM 2-06.4.1. The Drainage/Grading/Vegetation/Heat Island mitigation note 1 on the cover sheet refers to a geotechnical report. Please submit this for review. Paving and Grading note 22 of sheet 6 (Grading notes C-2) also refers to the geotechnical report. Provide Geotechnical report

2) Provide recordation information for the right-of-way dedication as required by rezone condition # 25 and AM 2-06.4.8C.

3) Keynote 51 is called out at both the northwest and southeast corners of the site on sheet 3. This is described as an electrical transformer with an easement. Per AM 2-06.4.8B please provide the recordation information and dimensions for this easement and confirm if transformer is in right-of-way
4) Keynote 16 should be enhanced to provide a pavement section per recommendations of a geotechnical report. See sheet 3. (See comment 1) Provide Geotechnical report
5) Keynote 46 should provide additional details such as reference to a standard detail or at least a descriptor such as a "curb opening." See sheet 3. Provide Detail
6) Per TSM 7-01.4.3E please show where the scupper is at the southeast corner of the retail building on sheet 5. Show all roof drains and scupper locations on plans
7) The southeast corner of the single family residence on sheet 3 has a scupper callout but not downspout callout. Show all roof drains and scupper locations on plans
8) At the southwest corner of the single family residence on sheet 5 a keynote 13 callout may be appropriate. Please update accordingly.
9) There appears to be line work for scuppers at the southeast corner of the site on sheet 5. Please provide callouts for keynote 11 as appropriate.

10) Paving and Grading Note 22 on sheet 6 refers to a geotechnical report. Please provide a copy of this for review against the 2nd submittal of the plans. Provide copy of Geotechnical report
2nd Submittal Comments to be addressed
11) Retail building plan on C-3. Provide Entrance and Exit locations. Relate/reference to detail for bicycle parking (50' radius) found on sheet C-4
12) Show service area for single dumpster enclosure. Dimension both the single and double dumpster service areas
13) Provide references back to sheet C-4 for details shown on C-4
14) Double dumpster enclosure layout does not meet dimensional specifications found in Figure 3A TSM 8-01.9.0
15) Demonstrate that chain link fence (Keynote 7 on sheet 5) does not impede drainage with collection of debris
Please contact me with any questions
John Van Winkle
John.van-winkle@tucsonaz.gov
520-837-5007
02/14/2018 KELLY LEE ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/29/2018 QJONES1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
05/29/2018 QJONES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
05/29/2018 QJONES1 REJECT SHELF Completed