Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0102
Parcel: 14025061A

Address:
5845 S PARK AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP16-0102
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
10/17/2016 AHINES2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
10/17/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Passed Agency which does not need to respond. For notification purposes only.
10/17/2016 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Reqs Change This DP has been approved on 11/02/2015 as PSL, the public sewer improvement plan is still under review with status of (Request for Corrections).

Respectfully.

AL.
Hussein Al Zubaidi <Hussein.AlZubaidi@pima.gov>
10/17/2016 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Passed Agency which does not need to respond. For notification purposes only.
10/17/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed Agency which does not need to respond. For notification purposes only.
10/17/2016 AHINES2 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed Agency which does not need to respond. For notification purposes only.
10/19/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 24, 2016
DUE DATE: November 14, 2016
SUBJECT: New Development
TO: Troy Williams
LOCATION: 5845 S Park Ave
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP16-0102
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the case number (DP16-0102).
2) Map Tucson Shows the soils on this site to be Type D Soils. The Hydrologic calculations in the drainage report assume type B Soils. Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 14.2, item 6 and UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, Item 5 a soils report is needed to show infiltration rate for a drainage basin in type D soils over 6 inches deep. Per Tucson Code 26-2 (retention) a safety factor of 2 shall be applied before calculating the required 12 hour drain down time required by UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, Item 3a. The City, State, zip code and email addresses are required for all of the subcontracors listed on the cover sheet per AM 2-06.4.1. The Drainage/Grading/Vegetation/Heat Island mitigation note 1 on the cover sheet refers to a geotechnical report. Please submit this for review. Paving and Grading note 22 of sheet 6 (Grading notes C-2) also refers to the geotechnical report.
3) The basis of elevation on the cover sheet has the elevation shown to the thousandths of a foot. This is unusual. Please verify this is not a typo. Please fix the typos in note 1 and 2 and in the drawing index per the redlines for the cover sheet.
4) General Note 6 on sheet 2 refers to the Town Engineer instead of the City Engineer. Please update for the City of Tucson.
5) Provide recordation information for the right-of-way dedication as required by rezone condition # 25 and AM 2-06.4.8C.
6) There is a handicap ramp at the NW corner of the site that is missing a keynote 14 callout. Please update accordingly.
7) There are a number of locations where dimensioning is overwriting on top of keynotes. Please correct all overwriting so that keynotes and dimensions are legible.
8) Per TSM 8-01.5.3B a 40 foot clear area is required in front of each trash enclosure. Please provide and dimension this 40 foot clear area on sheet 3.
9) Keynote 44, at the northwest corner of the parking, located between the retail building and the Basin B, is being called out from the curb line instead of the wheel stop. Please ensure callouts for keynote 42 and 44 are not confused between the curb and the wheel stops. Update accordingly. See sheet 3.
10) Keynote 28 refers to a residential recycling area instead of a short term bicycle rack as would be expected based on the symbol used at this location. There are no recycling areas called out for the other two duplexes further south. Please check to make sure keynote 2 is appropriately called out instead of keynote 28 as appropriate. See sheet 3.
11) Keynote 51 is called out at both the northwest and southeast corners of the site on sheet 3. This is described as an electrical transformer with an easement. Per AM 2-06.4.8B please provide the recordation information and dimensions for this easement.
12) Keynotes 11 and 12 as described in the keynote descriptions are not found in the plan view. Please call out all keynotes as appropriate. If a keynote is not used it should be removed from the list. See sheet 3.
13) Keynote 16 should be enhanced to provide a pavement section per recommendations of a geotechnical report. See sheet 3.
14) Please correct the typo in keynote 40 where is reads sidewall instead of sidewalk. Please provide a Standard Detail number to reference the scupper to for this keynote. See sheet 3.
15) Keynote 43 should refer to the assumed turning radii to show compliance with TSM 8-01.5.3E. See sheet 3.
16) Keynote 46 should provide additional details such as reference to a standard detail or at least a descriptor such as a "curb opening." See sheet 3.
17) Keynote 52 on sheet 3 refers to an Amenities area, swing, canopy, (144 SF) & bench area. Please call out these items individually by keynote and ensure that none of these items are water sensitive. The finished floor elevations for these amenities are shown to be 4 inches below the ponding water elevation for this basin. The conclusions/recommendations section of the drainage report requires proposed finished floor elevations adjacent to the basins to be 1 foot above the water surface elevations.
18) Keynote 18 is called out on sheet 3 are a detention/retention basin. Per UDC 7.14.4, Section 14.2, item 6 and UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, item 5, a Soils/Geotechnical Report is required to provide infiltration test results to show the basin will drain within 12 hours as required by UDC 7.14.3, Section 3.5.1, item 3a for type D soils. The hydrology calculations in the drainage report assume soil type B. Map Tucson shows a soil type D for this site. These calculations assume a runoff coefficient of 0.62 while sheet 1 of the SWPPP shows a runoff coefficient of 0.44. The drainage standards manual requires a developed conditions runoff coefficient of 0.92 be used. The SWPPP assumes a developed conditions runoff coefficient of 0.75 is used. Please provide narrative explaining the discrepancies as part of the drainage report.
19) General note 5 on page 1 of the SWPPP refers to holding harmless Cochise County/City of Sierra Vista. Please update this to reflect the required City of Tucson General Notes.
20) General note 10 on page 1 of the SWPPP refers to doing repairs to the satisfaction of the City of Sierra Vista. Please update this to reflect the proper regulatory authority.
21) Keynotes 4 and 6 on page 4 of the SWPPP do not appear to be called out on the plan sheets. Please update accordingly based only on the keynotes used on this plan set.
22) Keynote 28 should refer to a detail on the plans for the layout of the combination recycle/waste disposal area. The detail on sheet 4 is ok for keynote 4 but doesn't provide the level of detail needed to construct what is called out by keynote 28.
23) Keynote D, on sheet 5, refers to Standard Detail 208 which refers to a radius as called out per plan. Per TSM 10-01.3.2 and Figure 6 show a 25' radius for PAAL curb returns to a collector or arterial (ie S Park Ave). Show an 18' curb return for Alvord Road.
24) Keynote D, on sheet 5, refers to Standard Detail 208 which refers to a max slope of 12:1 (ie. 1" per 1'). Per TSM 10-01.4.1D1 the sidewalk portion of the driveway shall not exceed a 2% cross slope.
25) Darken the triangles on the slope shading to match keynote 19 on sheet 5.
26) There is shading shown on top of text just south of the west entrance that needs to be eliminated to allow the text to be read.
27) Per TSM 7-01.4.3E please show where the scupper is at the southeast corner of the retail building on sheet 5.
28) The southeast corner of the single family residence on sheet 3 has a scupper callout but not downspout callout. Please update accordingly.
29) At the southwest corner of the single family residence on sheet 5 a keynote 13 callout may be appropriate. Please update accordingly.
30) There appears to be line work for scuppers at the southeast corner of the site on sheet 5. Please provide callouts for keynote 11 as appropriate.
31) Keynote 20 on sheet 5 refers to gravel. This keynote is not found in the plan view. Please update as appropriate.
32) Keynote 8, on sheet 5, shows openings in the masonry wall to convey the 26.9 cfs offsite flows. Please provide narrative and calculations in the drainage report to support the choice and quantity of hydraulic structures for conveying this offsite flow.
33) Keynote 3 on sheet 5 refers to bluestake. Please show where this should be called out.
34) Paving and Grading Note 22 on sheet 6 refers to a geotechnical report. Please provide a copy of this for review against the 2nd submittal of the plans.
35) Paving and Grading note 25 on sheet 6 is not clear what is trying to be accomplished. Is this regarding the sizing of the drainage openings for the proposed masonry wall along the eastern property boundary.
36) Table 1 on page 2 of the drainage report lists the offsite drainage area as 1.33 acres. The actual offsite area should be listed a 4.34 acres based on the calculations.
37) The developed conditions, offsite drainage section of the drainage report indicates that the drainage concept consists of allowing the offsite flow to continue to enter the site unimpeded as the east property boundary. Please address the proposed masonry wall and the sizing of the 16" x 8" openings at 8' off center in this section.
38) The Stormwater Detention/Retention section indicates that the water harvesting areas will be a maximum of 1.0 inches in depth. The two detention/retention basins are called out as being 1.0 feet in depth. The basin routing calculations require the 1.0 foot depth. Figure 4 from the drainage report and the grading plan shows 1.0 foot in depth. Please correct the narrative.
39) Table 5 of the drainage report refers to a duplex 4 which should have a proposed finished floor elevation of 2538.66. There is no duplex 4 shown on the plans. Please update accordingly.
40) There is a typo in the conclusions/recommendations section of the drainage report where the words "situated within" are written twice. Please eliminate this typo.
41) Rezone condition 22 refers to a requirement that the basins conform to the requirements of the human activity zone. Per UDC 7.14.3, Section 4.3.1 (Requirements: Basin Side Slopes) varying slopes of 8:1 to 4:1 with continuous uniform slopes not exceeding 20% of the of the perimeter. Please update keynote 19 on sheet 5 and the basin routing calculations in the drainage report accordingly.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
10/25/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Reqs Change General note 10 on sheet C-2 references gates. Could not find gates on any sheet. Please clarify.
10/25/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments
10/25/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: La Cima Market / Residential - 5845 S. Park Avenue
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0102 - Rezoning Case C9-14-06 (O-3 to C-1 Authorized)

TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 25, 2016

DUE DATE: November 14, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is September 29, 2017.


2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Assure that the title block of all plan sheets are the consistent and include the same relevant information, revise are required.


2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

2. COMMENT: For consistency, locate the PDSD stamp next to the title block of all plan sheets.


2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing.

3. COMMENT: Add the 3 inch by 5 inch block on the cover sheet only as noted by the standard above.


2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

4. COMMENT: Add the location map on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above.


2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet.

5. COMMENT: Label the contour interval on the appropriate sheets (Grading Sheet).


2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet.

6. COMMENT: Add the symbols legend as noted by the standard above.


2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

7. COMMENT: Label the actual sheet numbers on the Drawing Index text block, see redlines.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

8. COMMENT: Revise the text block of all who that assisted in preparing this DP document. Names, mailing addresses, Email addresses, and Telephone numbers of every person must be listed on the cover sheet. The same information for all registrants that have sealed this document must be listed. Revise as required as noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:
2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

9. COMMENT: Add the name of the project in the title block of all plan sheets.

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

10. COMMENT: Include in the title block of all plan sheets, brief legal description "located in the SW1/4, NE1/4, NW1/4 of Section 7 T15, R14"


2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

11. COMMENT: All the sheets in the DP must be sequentially numbered i.e., 1 of 18, 2 of 18 etc. The sheets from U-1 to the last sheet have not been numbered. Revise as required.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

12. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0102, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

List next to the title block of all plan sheets the administrative address of the site.

List next to the title block of all plan sheets the rezoning case number C9-14-06. If applicable any additional case numbers that apply to this development must also be listed.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

13. COMMENT: Add the location map to the cover sheet as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

14. COMMENT: Revise the new zoning note to "Proposed Zoning C-1 per Rezoning Case C9-14-06".


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

15. COMMENT: This site is to be developed with Retail and Residential components (Multi-use) two principle uses. Revise the "Proposed Use" note on all sheets as follows; Proposed Use - Retail Trade Use Group Food and Beverage Sales Subject to UDC Section 4.9.13.0 and Residential Use Group - Multifamily Development.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

16. COMMENT: The conditions of rezoning must be listed on the DP on the cover sheet or the site plan sheet. As part of the re-submittal documents, include a separate response memo stating how all the rezoning conditions will be met and/or demonstrate on the DP compliance with the rezoning conditions.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

17. COMMENT: Revise the square footages for the residential development as follows on all sheets where the square footages have been noted; List the units as Duplex bldg. = 1 1,824 SF, Duplex bldg. = 2 1,824 SF, Duplex bldg. = 3 1,824 SF, SFR bldg. = 1,824 SF.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

18. COMMENT: Both the proposed uses are not subject to lot coverage requirements. Remove all calculations related to lot or site coverage and FAR.

List the allowed height of 18 feet per rezoning condition 13 and the proposed height of the retail building and the residential buildings.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

19. COMMENT: This project is to be developed in two phases. Phase I is for the retail component and Phase II will be the residential component. Clearly revise the phase calculations representative of the use and land area that will be utilized for that use. In other words the residential component will utilize X-number of square feet for the development this is the square footage that should be used for the density calculation which still applies. Lot or site coverage does not apply for either use so remove any reference to lot coverage and floor area ratio (FAR). See redlines.



2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents:
"Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan."

20. COMMENT: Add the Drainage note to the cover sheet as noted by the standard above

2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes

2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

21. COMMENT: Add the note to the cover sheet as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

22. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label all existing easements on the property. The location width and type of easement along with the recordation info must be labeled.


2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

23. COMMENT: Label the dimension of the future curb and sidewalk from the future property line along 12th Avenue. Label the width of the future sidewalk for 12th Avenue.


2-06.4.9.G - If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. If such temporary improvements are off the site of the phase under consideration, a temporary easement or other legal documentation to assure legal use of the property is required. Note recording information.

24. COMMENT: It is not clear how the phase I development will allow for the refuse truck to maneuver in and out of the site if the driveway system is not all constructed in Phase I. Demonstrate how Phase can stand alone.

2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.

25. COMMENT: Demonstrate how the circulation will comply within the Phase I development>

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

26. COMMENT: Dimension the width of the PAAL at the curved portion of the PAAL next to the Retail building.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

27. COMMENT: Revise the parking calculations to state two parking spaces per dwelling based on a two bedroom per dwelling. Replace the word "furnished" with "Provided".


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

28. COMMENT: Review the bicycle parking calculations for the retail and residential uses and list the correct number of parking spaces required for both uses separately.

Add a fully dimensioned detail drawing of the long term facility for both uses.

2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required.

29. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes.
Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width.
Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information.

30. COMMENT: Dedication is required per rezoning condition 25. The dedication must be recorded under separate instrument. The recordation information must be listed on the DP and completed before approval of the DP.


2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

31. COMMENT: If applicable add the information noted by the standard above.

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.
2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

32. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the DP site plan. Once zoning has approved the DP the grading plan is also approved by zoning. Assure that any changes that are made to the base site plan are made to the Grading, Landscape and other site sheets.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

33. COMMENT: There are no setback requirements from the retail use to the adjacent properties to the north C-1 one or the south O-3 zone. There is no setback requirement from the residential development (which is considered non-residential due to the number of dwellings proposed) adjacent to the west property O-3 zone but here is a building setback requirement adjacent to the east property which is zoned R-2. t The minimum building setback is 1 and ½ times the height of the wall facing the property line. The required setback of 18 feet is required based on the proposed building height of 12 feet. Revise the building setback or a Design development option (Setback variance) will be required.


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

34. COMMENT: Clarify if the section of the sidewalk from the street to the retail building is physically separated from the vehicular use area. If not the sidewalk must be raised or some form of permanent physical barrier must be provided, see redlines.

Label the longitudinal slopes for all proposed sidewalks based on the grading plan grades.


2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

35. COMMENT: Clarify if the dumpsters are also for the residential use?

2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

36. COMMENT: As noted in a comment above, demonstrate how the conditions of rezoning have been addressed. Also a separate response memo must be included in the next submittal explaing how conditions of the rezoning case C9-14-06 have been addressed.

2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping.

37. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan how mail will be provided.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

38. COMMENT: Add a note that all signage will be permitted under separate permit.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

39. COMMENT: See ten landscape reviewer comments.

40. COMMENT: Review the plan and check revise typos, leader line locations etc and revise as required.

41. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to the zoning comments and the changes to the DP plans.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
10/26/2016 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Reqs Change Note: Applicant needs to respond to Addressing Review Comments proveded in Documents folder in PRO.

DP16-0102 La Cima Market / 1st Submittal (P16AD00510) is being Returned for Corrections by Pima County Addressing.

Please see the sticky note comments in file 1_DP16-0102 La Cima Market_Addressing.pdf. I have also attached a comment summary for your use.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you,

Robin Freiman
Addressing Specialist
Pima County Development Services Department
201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 724-7570
10/31/2016 AHINES2 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Approv-Cond October 31, 2016

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP16-0102, La Cima Market; 1st Submittal, a Development Package application for an approximately 1.26 acre site located northeast of the intersection of East Alvord Road and South Park Avenue. The proposed land use is commercial and residential.

This site is within the Tucson International Airport avigation easement requirements and public disclosure area, FAA traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace.

The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA. Since the applicant has indicated that this project will be developed in two phases, commercial development in Phase I and residential development in Phase II, it is recommended that Form 7460 be filed at least 45 days before each construction phase begins. Any cranes used for the project must also be identified with Form 7460. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp.

The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan.

Conditions of approval:

"That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Avigation Easement prior to the subdivision process which discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

"The developer shall provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to new property owners with new home purchases. The new home purchasers shall not record the Airport Disclosure Statement form. New home purchasers shall sign the Airport Disclosure Statement form and return a signed copy to Tucson Airport Authority. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided."

"The development shall not cause or potentially affect aviation in the vicinity of the site, including but not limited to, physical obstructions to aircraft operations, interference with operations by way of electrical static, visual obstructions through emissions or glare, and/or the open storage of petroleum products, explosive materials, or materials which attract or lead to the concentration of wildlife."

The current property owner or person authorized to sign on behalf of the current property owner shall complete, sign, and record the Avigation Easement. Once the Avigation Easement is recorded please send a copy of the recorded easement to Tucson Airport Authority by either email (send to srobidoux@flytucson.com) or to the mailing address provided below.

Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

The Tucson Airport Authority understands this site is proposed to be developed in two distinct phases, with the residential development occurring in the second phase. The Airport Disclosure Statement form is only applicable to residential uses. This form is being provided to notify new property owners they are near an airport and is meant as a tool to educate new property owners. The developer will provide the Airport Disclosure Statement form, at time of sale, to the new property owners with new home purchases. The new property owner shall forward a signed copy of the Airport Disclosure Statement form to:

Scott Robidoux
Airport Planner
Tucson Airport Authority
7250 South Tucson Boulevard
Suite 300
Tucson, AZ 85756

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811.

Respectfully,

Scott Robidoux,
Airport Planner

cc file
11/03/2016 AHINES2 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved CDRC Development Plan: DP16-0102
Address: 5845 S Park Av
Existing Zoning: C-1
Proposed Use: Market and Residential
Due Date: Thursday, November 10, 2016
Electronic Documents may be found at the following link: http://www.tucsonaz.gov/PRO/Command?mode=permit&firstTime=true&number_key=dp16-0102&command=InitialProcess

I have no issues regarding our portion of the review.

CSO Cindy Dunn #39119
Commnity Resource CSO
Tucson Police Dept/ODS
4410 S. Park Ave
Tucson, AZ 85714
520-837-2860
Cynthia.Dunn@tucsonaz.gov
11/04/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Unified Development Code
2-10.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS
The landscape plan shall include the following:
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Screening
a. Location of screening elements;
b. Height of screening material and reference point for measurement;
C. Type of screening material (e.g., masonry wall, wood fence, species of plant material). Identify screening elements on landscape plan.
7.7. NATIVE PLANT PRESERVATION
7.7.3. APPLICABILITY
The provisions of this section apply to all development as listed below.
A. New Development
Projects on a site that does not contain any plant on the Protected Native Plant List as demonstrated by the applicant and subject to approval through procedures established at the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). This application can be submitted prior to an applicable review process and approved for an exception on the site. The approved exception is valid for up to one year from the date of the approval; or,
Projects on a site or parcel that contains Protected Native Plants that will not be substantially impacted by development on the site as demonstrated by the applicant per this section and subject to approval through procedures established at the PDSD, provided that construction occurs per the approved plan.
Submit NPP plan or Application for Exception.
Ensure that all Engineering and Zoning comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply.
11/07/2016 AHINES2 COT NON-DSD REAL ESTATE Reqs Change Jim Rossi has assigned this Real Estate review to me. I've spoken with the developer and requested they draft a legal description for the Park Ave dedication. Once I have that back, executed by the landowners, and get it recorded I will let you know they've satisfied condition #25 in the rezoning.

John Cahill
Senior Property Agent
City of Tucson Real Estate
201 North Stone Av. 6th Floor
Tucson, AZ 85701
(520) 837-6768
11/09/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
2. Revise the site drawing to include the location and size of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
3. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
4. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required at the water meter for multimetered properties that have more than one meter connected to another or irrigation systems that are served by the same meter that serves the building. Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
5. Correct the occupancy group shown on sheet C1 for the new commercial building (should be M for Mercantile) and the residential buildings (should be R3).
11/10/2016 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP16-0102 La Cima Market 11/10/16

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Package
() Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations


SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

(X) Denied
() No Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Package
() Landscape Plan
() Other













REVIEWER: mm DATE: 11/10/16

COMMENTS


1. Development Plan DP16-0102, La Cima Market First Submittal, is subject to Rezoning Case (C9-14-06), Pleas list al rezoning conditions verbatim as approved by Mayor and Council on October 21, 2014

" Prior to approval of development package (DP16-0102) La cima Market 1st Submittal), shall be in compliance with Rezoning Case C9-14-06. Rezoning Case C9-14-06 as approved by Mayor and Council on October 21, 2014, with twenty six (26) preliminary conditions of rezoning, for consideration by Mayor and Council. As of November 10, 2016 development package is not in compliance with pending conditions of rezoning, which are the following:
i. Please revise DP sheet C-1 under the general notes and add all C9-14-06 rezoning conditions 1-26, verbatim as approved by Mayor and Council on October 21, 2104.
ii. Development Plan does not comply with rezoning condition #8 in reference to the freestanding signs on drive.
iii. Development Pan does not comply with rezoning condition #9 in reference to landscaping.
iv. Rezoning condition # 10 does not comply along the northern property line. Please revise key note along northern property line to install masonry wall.
v. Development Package does not comply with rezoning condition
# 11
vi. Please comply with rezoning condition #14 and submit building elevations.
11/10/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
11/14/2016 GLENN HICKS COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Passed pass
11/15/2016 DAN SANTA CRUZ ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed DP16-0102
An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit.
The current submittal did not provide adequate information in order to verify compliance with the outdoor lighting code and for the even distribution of illumination. Therefore, the review for compliance with the outdoor lighting code and the even distribution of illumination will be conducted during the review of the construction documents.
11/15/2016 AHINES2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/08/2017 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed