Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0088
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/28/2016 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/09/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/09/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 5 West Sahuaro Street - Commercial Wood Storage Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0088 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 9, 2016 DUE DATE: August 16, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 26, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 1. Follow Up Comment to Previous Comment 11 and 12: Now that it has been determined that there will be future right of way dedication, the site must be designed based on the Stone Avenue future right of way property line. That means that the current DP landscape buffer and screening must be designed based on the future MS&R for approval or the DP must be designed based on the current right of way with an additional site and landscape sheet depicting the future landscape and screening requirements and a recorded MS&R covenant. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. Previous Comment 11 - It is not clear if the current half right of way line is also the future right of way line. Clarify if additional right of way is required. If so draw and dimension the future Right of Way line from the centerline. Draw, label and dimension the future curb and sidewalk. Previous Comment 12 - Add the information as noted by the standard above. (The applicant should verify with TDOT to see if the Grant Road widening affects the right of way alignment south from the intersection of Grant and Stone.) 2. Follow Up to Previous Comment 14: After conversation with Russlyn Wells, it does not appear that contact was made as requested in order to get a determination with regards to the storage as noted in the previous comment. Contact Russlyn Wells and provide any information she requests in order for her to make a final decision on the outside storage. Also, keep in mind that the letter I mentioned was for your use as reference when you contacted Russlyn. The letter I mentioned is based a site requiring developed area setbacks. This site is on a arterial street where developing area setbacks apply. One thing that should be mentioned to Russlyn is the use(s) of the site. Is this strictly storage or is there a wholesale or retail component or accessory use? 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Previous Comment 14 - Per UDC Section 4.9.10.A.2, Outdoor storage, when permitted, shall not be located in the street perimeter yard. The property is on a corner lot and fronts on an Arterial street. There is no building proposed on the site to define the street perimeter yard. Technically the entire parcel is considered a street perimeter yard and no storage is allowed. However a Zoning Administrator determination has been made for a similar project. In order to approve this development as proposed the applicant must contact Russlyn Wells to see if the previous zoning administrator determination is applicable to this project. (The address of the project I am referring to is 1695 E 21st street) If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and ZA Letter |
| 08/11/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/15/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS An approved site plan is required indicating how the project will comply with UDC standards when the MS&R right-of-way can no longer be used as part of the site. Such plan shall be an exhibit to an executed covenant for recordation stating the responsibility of the property owner, successor, or assignee as to the removal of improvements and compliance with the UDC at no cost to the City. It has been determined that there will be future right of way dedication; the site must be designed based on the Stone Avenue future right of way property line. The DP landscape buffer and screening must be designed based on the future MS&R for approval or the DP must be designed based on the current right of way with an additional site and landscape sheet depicting the future landscape and screening requirements and a recorded MS&R covenant. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |