Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0088
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please show all existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to 2012 International Fire Code, Section 507.5 for location requirements. Please refer to Section 503 for Fire Department Access requirements. Depending on location of proposed buildings, a turnaround will probably be required. An approved method of turnaround does not exist on current plan. |
| 06/07/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning review comments |
| 06/07/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: 5 West Sahuaro Street - Commercial Wood Storage Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0088 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 7, 2016 DUE DATE: June 24, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 26, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: List the Landscape Architects information on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0088, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 3. COMMENT: The Billboard is also a principal use and must be listed under general note three along with any applicable Use Specific Standards. Revise General note three as required. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 4. COMMENT: There appears to be a conflict with the square footage listed on the cover sheet in general note five and the square footage labeled on the proposed storage areas depicted sheet three. Revise the general five or the square footage on sheet three for consistency. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: Add a statement that states that the site has been designed to comply with the MS&R UDC Section 5.4. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 6. COMMENT: The information listed on the plan for right of way is measured from the PL to the Centerline. The dimension line or note should be revised to show the distance to the east property line. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 7. COMMENT: Label on sheet 3 the zoning classification I-1 across the Stone Avenue. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 8. COMMENT: Draw and label the SVTs as noted by the standard above along the Stone Avenue. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 9. COMMENT: One of the vehicle parking spaces must be a Van accessible parking space with an access aisle. Revise the parking calculations to include the accessible parking space and revise the drawing to depict the Accessible parking space and aisle. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 10. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 11. COMMENT: It is not clear if the current half right of way line is also the future right of way line. Clarify if additional right of way is required. If so draw and dimension the future Right of Way line from the centerline. Draw, label and dimension the future curb and sidewalk. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 12. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. (The applicant should verify with TDOT to see if the Grant Road widening affects the right of way alignment south from the intersection of Grant and Stone.) 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 13. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the DP site plan as it relates to the zoning review purview. Once the DP site plan is approved by zoning and assuming there are no significant modifications required to the grading plan sheet, zoning will also approve the grading plan. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 14. COMMENT: Per UDC Section 4.9.10.A.2, Outdoor storage, when permitted, shall not be located in the street perimeter yard. The property is on a corner lot and fronts on a Arterial street. There is no building proposed on the site to define the street perimeter yard. Technically the entire parcel is considered a street perimeter yard and no storage is allowed. However a Zoning Administrator determination has been made for a similar project. In order to approve this development as proposed the applicant must contact Russlyn Wells to see if the previous zoning administrator determination is applicable to this project. (The address of the project I am referring to is 1695 E 21st street) 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. 15. COMMENT: It is not clear if Dumpsters are required for this use. See the Engineering review comments. Address the standard as noted above if applicable. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 16. COMMENT: The proposed loading zone space appears to be encroaching onto the landscape buffer area. Relocate the loading zone outside the landscape buffer. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 17. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comment related to Landscape buffers and screening requirements. 18. COMMENT: Per the site plan the Chain-link fence on the east side of the property is within the City of Tucson Stone Avenue right of way. Provide documentation from the city of Tucson that permission or TRE has been granted to allow the fence within the COT R/W. Contact Jim Rossi with COT Real Estate Division for more information on TRE. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/08/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: June 8, 2016 DUE DATE: June 24, 2016 SUBJECT: Site Grading TO: Kevin Hall, PE LOCATION: 5 W Sahuaro REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0088 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per UDC 7.4.6 I the 2" Chipped rock placed on native soil is not an acceptable surfacing material for vehicular use area. Use keynote 21 which references the 2.5" AC on 4" ABC instead for this area. 2) Fix the typo in keynote 12 where the circle is misplaced around the 2nd E in the word SEE instead of around the A in detail A. 3) Per TSM 8-01.8.0 please provide a waste stream calculation on the plans. 4) Demolition keynote 4 on sheet 6 should be called out where curb is being removed for the entryway. Please ensure clarity of the extents for which curb will be removed. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 06/17/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 06/20/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders. Screening is not required between similar uses in accordance with Table 7.6.4-1. Outdoor storage requires a 6' screen adjacent to MS&R and Non-MS&R streets. Provide appropriate screening. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/20/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |