Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP16-0087
Parcel: 11820037A

Address:
1402 S 10TH AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP16-0087
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
06/13/2016 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
06/23/2016 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
06/23/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: Container Maintenance Facility - 1402 S. 10th Avenue
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0087

TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 23, 2016

DUE DATE: July 05, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 05, 2017.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0087, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - The existing and proposed use is not correct. "INDUSTRIAL" is a use group not a use. Following discussions with staff the proposed use should be listed Sanitation System.

3. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - As the proposed use is not a use allowed in the R-3 zone a rezoning is required.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

5. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - As a general note provide the square footage of each building.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Until comment 3 above has been addressed the requirement for lot coverage cannot be verified.2-06.4.8 -

Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

7. Zoning acknowledges that right-of-way widths were provided for 23rd and 25th Street and 10th Avenue but not for 11th Avenue2-06.4.8.C - Sheet x1.1 provide the right-of-way (ROW) width for 11th Avenue. Also provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks within the ROW for all streets shown on the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - As 10th Avenue is designated as a Collector on the COT MS&R map shown the future ROW along with the future sight visibility triangles on the plan.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said there are several areas with this requirement are not met, see yellow high lighter sheet 7.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - It does not appear that the vehicle and truck parking areas meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I.1. Clarify how the requirements are met.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 -Sheet 7 clarify what the areas called out to be surfaced with "RECYCLED CONCRETE GARVEL & ROLLED MILLINGS" are going to be used for. If this is vehicle use area the proposed surfacing does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.I.1.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - It does not appear that the proposed surfacing shown on sheet 7 match what is shown on sheets 13 & 14.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide access land and PAAL width dimensions for the entire site.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Until the gross floor area of the building is provided the vehicle parking calculation cannot be verified.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Until comment 14 is addressed the required number of accessible vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per 2012 IBC Section 1106.5 at least one of the accessible vehicle parking spaces, depending on total number required, will need to meet the requirements of 2010 ADAAG section 502.The proposed accessible space and access aisle do not meet this requirement.

17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a mounting height dimension for the accessible sign on the plan. This dimension should be 7'-0" to the bottom of the van sign.

18. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet x1.1 shows wheel stops along the north side of the proposed vehicle parking lot, sheets 13 & 14 do not show the wheel stops. If wheel stops are proposed demonstrate on a detail how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3 are met.

19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 17 detail J shows a vehicle overhang of 3'-0" this does not meet UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3

20. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet 7 the vehicle parking spaces shown along the north side of the parking lot with wheel stops do not meet the minimum 18' space depth requirement see UDC TABLE 7.4.6-1: MOTOR VEHICLE USE AREA DIMENSIONS

21. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1: Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces, Utility Use zero short and long term bicycle parking is required. If you are going to provide remove all references to "CLASS 1 & CLASS 2" from the plan as the reference is not applicable. If bicycle parking is provided provide details that show how all requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D are met.

22. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

23. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide sidewalk dimensions for all sidewalks shown on the plan.

24. 2-06.4.9.R - Per TSM Section 7-01.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainage way or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide a sidewalk from the proposed structures to 23rd Street that meets the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.

25. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection area on the plan.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
06/23/2016 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning Comments
06/29/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL
SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data
A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.
B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:
1. Legal description and address of site;
2. Cross-reference to:
a. Rezoning case;
b. Subdivision case;
c. Board of Adjustment case;
d. Design Development Option case;
e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
7.6. LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
Proposed Landscape and Screening Improvements
Use of the Public Right-of-Way
Nonrequired landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met:
1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type;
2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and,
3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk.
Include the location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place on submitted plans. or provide previously approved documents.
Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.
Additional comments may apply
06/29/2016 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
06/30/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the rim elevation of sanitary manhole 5661-03. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/07/2017 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed