Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0084
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/01/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/01/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Mercado San Augustin Annex Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0084 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 1, 2016 DUE DATE: June 21, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is May 20, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 1. COMMENT: The Landscape Architects information shall be included on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 2. COMMENT: Sheet 8 title does not appear to be labeled correctly or as listed under the sheet index on the cover sheet. Revise the title on sheet 8 to match the sheet index. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0084, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. It is also clear that this site will not be designed to meet certain UDC requirements. The site is within the Downtown Core Sub-district and per general note 11 on the cover sheet this project has been designed to comply with the criteria of the downtown area infill incentive district. If the applicant has not done so or if an IID application has not been processed, contact Carolyn Laurie for information related to the IID review and approval process. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 4. COMMENT: Lighten up the line work within the location map. The heavy or dark line work make it hard to see the map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5. COMMENT: on the cover sheet, under the Zoning and Land Use Notes text block, note 4, include the applicable "Use Specific Standards" associated with the uses proposed in this development. Also the Retail Use Group includes multiple retail uses. Be specific as to the proposed retails use(s) proposed and include the correct Use Specific Stsandard. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 6. COMMENT: Any additional conditions or design criteria associated with the IID review and approval process will have to be listed on the DP, cover sheet or IID plan. Compliance with applicable conditions of the IID approval must be demonstrated on the DP. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 7. COMMENT: List any additional case number related to separate review and approval process related to the this development as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 8. COMMENT: On sheet three, add a symbol legend to clearly differentiate the hatching used. In order to verify the square footage listed in note four under the "Zoning and Land Use Notes" text block the square footage of each building must be listed under a building list or within each footprint of every proposed building. In addition any use area proposed that is not within a building but is part of the Food Service, Retail, etc uses must also be clearly delineated and square footages labeled. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 9. COMMENT: In order to verify the lot coverage all building and paved areas square footage must be listed on the DP. 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 10. COMMENT: Under the Drainage notes text block correct the alignment of the note numbers for notes 2 and 3. The note numbers do not appear to be aligned with the correct note. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 11. COMMENT: Besides the 40' sewer easement labeled on the plan, and if applicable, draw, label and dimension any additional easements that may be within the property. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 12. COMMENT: On the cover sheet and sheet three, label the adjacent zoning to the south and the west of the subject property. The zoning to the south is I-1 and to the west the zoning is PAD 10 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 13. COMMENT: Dimension the width of the paved areas along the north side of the site. Label the length and width of the loading zones areas 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: It is acknowledged that none of the required parking spaces will be provided on site. It is further acknowledged that the parking is to be provided in the current parking lot on block 5. The offsite parking will require approval through a shared parking agreement that is approved by the City. This item can be discussed as part of the IID. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 15. COMMENT: The information as noted above will have to be provided with the next submittal of the DP. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 16. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the proposed loading zone locations. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 17. COMMENT: The long and short term bicycle paring facilities could not be verified on any of the site sheets. Draw and label the locations of the two types bicycle facilities. Add the fully dimensioned detail drawings for both facilities and if the long term facilities are proposed within the building the facility must meet the design criteria listed in UDC section 7.4.9. Fully dimensioned detail drawing for the long term facility must be added to the DP. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 18. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the DP site plan. Once the DP site plan is approved the grading plan is also approved. Ensure that any changes that are made to the DP site plan are also made to any site sheet in the DP package. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 19. COMMENT: Label the building setbacks for all buildings fronting on the street perimeter. If the setbacks is part of the IID modification request, the allowed setbacks through the IID approval must be drawn and labeled. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 20. COMMENT: Add the information for all buildings as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 21. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the site sheets that the pedestrian circulation meets ADA Longitudinal and cross slopes requirements. No accessible ramps could be verified on the plans but if they are to be provided, include detail drawings with the slopes annotated. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 22. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 23. COMMENT: Provide the locations if any for mail service for the use on this development. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 24. COMMENT: Indicate the locations of any proposed free standing monument signage. Add a note that any signage will be permitted under separate permit. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 25. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 06/01/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please indicate location of existing and/or proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to 2012 International Fire Code, section 507 for spacing requirements. |
| 06/01/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments |
| 06/16/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/16/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. B. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: 1. Legal description and address of site; 2. Cross-reference to: a. Rezoning case; b. Subdivision case; c. Board of Adjustment case; d. Design Development Option case; e. Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, f. Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. 5.12. DOWNTOWN AREA INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT (IID) 5.12.8. GENERAL IID ZONING OPTION DESIGN STANDARDS Shade a. Except as provided below, shade shall be provided for at least 50% of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82 degrees above the horizon. Shade may be provided by trees, arcades, canopies, or shade structures provided their location and design characteristics are compatible with the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard with the approval of the Transportation Department. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this standard. b. Exception The PDSD Director may approve an IID Plan providing less than 50% shade where compliance is not feasible due to a project site's location and/or building orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this standard. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/17/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). 2. The presence of manholes in a private sewer collection system will require review of the sewer design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the design to PDEQ at 150 W Congress St, 1st Floor (520-724-7382). A separate plumbing permit from Development Services will be required for construction of the private sewer collection system. 3. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is less than 12" below the first floor elevation in the case of all of the buildings that will have waste water connection. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of backwater valves when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/17/2016 | CHRIS POIRIER | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | See Sticky Note Comment Document in Associated Documents folder. DP16-0084 Mercado San Agustin Annex is being returned for corrections. Please see the attached sticky note comments. I have also attached a comment summary for your convenience. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 06/20/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/20/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Add a general note indicating that work near the Sun Link tracks will require a track access permit. Contact Sun Link Operations at 520.791.3333. 2. Clearly label existing contours. If the areas of the site are lowered the LOMA-F may be invalidated. 3. Detention may be waived based on the criteria in the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual Section 2.3. Clearly indicate the criterion used and provide supporting information. 4. Demonstrate how landscape areas will use stormwater runoff to the maximum extent possible. Provide details to show the grates in the landscape borders will be designed to provide water harvesting in these areas. To the maximum extent possible, direct the area drains to landscape areas before discharge off site. UDC 7.6.6.C 5. Provide notes and show on plans how all landscape areas will be depressed to facilitate water harvesting. |
| 06/21/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Provide a general note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based upon the calculated waste stream tonnage from Table 1 for the intended uses per TSM 8-01.4.0.B.4. 2. On Sheet 4, drainage is directed toward the enclosure and Storage Area #2/Green Room. There does not appear to be an opening in the corner to allow the drainage to pass to the north. Drainage is not allowed to pass through the enclosure nor can the enclosure block drainage per TSM 8-01.5.4.C. Show how the drainage flows out of this corner area. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net Ken Perry, Principal PE, LEED AP 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Office 520.620.9870, ext. 1 |
| 06/23/2016 | AHINES2 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | The applicant has not formally submitted for the IID. The Design Professional folder will continue to the next submittal. |
| 06/23/2016 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |