Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0065
Parcel: 11704188A

Address:
127 W 5TH ST

Review Status: Active

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP16-0065
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Active
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
04/12/2016 AHINES2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
04/14/2016 FDILLON1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Needs Review This project requires IID review
04/15/2016 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
05/04/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location of water lines, and fire hydrants.
b. The point of connection to the existing public sewer.
c. Any existing or proposed utility easements
d. The first floor elevation for the building
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
05/09/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change May 10, 2016
The following items must be addressed.
1. The property is within a FEMA floodplain. The floodplain boundaries must be shown on the Development Package site plan. The location is within the area affected by a LOMR with an effective date of June 13, 2016. The revised floodplain boundaries may be shown but the DP will not be approved until after the effective date.
2. The parcel shown on the Development Package is part of a larger parcel created by combining several lots. Show the whole parcel on the Development Package. All buildings on the combined parcel must be shown and evidence of permitted construction must be provided.
3. If the combined lot is to be divided, it must be reviewed for compliance with the land split or subdivision requirements of UDC 8. If a subdivision plat is required, a tentative and final plat will be required.
4. Add a note indicating all work in the right-of-way will require a right-of-way use permit.
05/09/2016 AHINES2 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approv-Cond The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of the Development Plan submittal for the Whistle Stop Depot property located at 127 W. 5th Street in Tucson.

Currently, 95 gallon APCs are used for refuse and recycling material storage on the Whistle Stop Depot property. ES calculated the waste generation rate at this facility and agrees that use of the two APCs is appropriate for this site with servicing once per week. The APCs must be screened from public view and from adjacent developments. The storage location for the APCs should be stated in a note on the Development Plan. In addition, the method of screening the APCs from public view should be described on the Development Plan.

With the addition of the two notes described above on the Development Plan, ES approves the proposed waste management activities for the Whistle Stop Depot property.

Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review.

Thomas G. Ryan, P.E.
City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department
05/10/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See zoning comments.
05/10/2016 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Identification and Descriptive Data

Plans will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING


Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval, Submit previously approved landscape plan or include plan with existing vegetation identified.

SECTION 4-02.0.0: FLOODPLAIN, WASH AND ERZ STANDARDS

This site is within a Regulated area

Encroachment in Regulated Areas

If the project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following.
1. Environmental Resource Report. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC. The supporting material for preparation of the Environmental Resource Report is based on information from the Hydrologic Data and Wash Information maps on the Tucson Department of Transportation internet web site: The Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitat Map and Report, the Mayor and Council Interim Watercourse Improvement Policy and subsequent adopted policies, the Tucson Stormwater Management Study, the following Basin Management Plans: 1) West Branch, Santa Cruz; 2) Houghton East; 3) Este Wash; and 4) Arroyo Chico. the Tucson Stormwater Management Study, Phase II and field observation. An application may request that an element listed below be waived or that the report address only a specified area where a full report is not applicable to the proposed encroachment. DSD may grant such waivers where the elements or full report are not required by code.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply.
05/10/2016 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Zoning Review

PROJECT: Whistle Stop Depot
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0065

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 10, 2016

DUE DATE: May 10, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is , 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.


CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:


1. COMMENT: Provide the assigned development package case number, DP16-0065, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.


2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

2. COMMENT: Label the following major streets and routes on the location map, sixth avenue and University Boulevard.


2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

3. COMMENT: Revise the legal description under the location map to match the legal description in the title block.


2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

4. COMMENT: The previously approved DP included the overall combined parcel with parking on the east portion of the parcel. The current parcel size is listed by the Pima County Assessor's information at 45,025 square feet, yet general note 4 lists the Gross Site Area as 24,751 square feet. The DP site plan also depicts the west half of the overall site with a separate distance and bearing giving the impression of a possible lot split. Clarify the discrepancy and indicate by note if the developed area is 24,751 sq. ft. or is the parcel to be split in two. Additional review comments may be forthcoming based on the response to this comment.


2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet.

5. COMMENT:


2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

6. COMMENT: Provide with the next submittal, a copy of the referenced 9/5/13 interpretation letter.


2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

7. COMMENT: Per general note 17, the parking is being provided based on approval of the DLS IID. Clarify if an application for the DLS overlay has been submitted for review by PDSD Staff. The DP shall provide by notes any UDC code requirements that may be modified under the IID - DLS.


2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. COMMENT: Provide on the cover sheet a separate note section listing any proposed or requested code modifications. List the date of approval and reference the DLS IID case number. (Reference the DLS IID case number in the lower right corner of plan sheets next to the title block.


2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones.

9. COMMENT: As noted in comment 4 that it is not clear whether the overall parcel is to be used for this development, indicate on the plan by note if the portion of the parcel to the east is to be included in the DLS IID review and what if any use is proposed in this area.


2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:
2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

10. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. See related comments 4 and 9.


2-06.4.7.B.2 - If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks.

2-06.4.7.B.2.a - "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.)
In the case of one lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations."

11. COMMENT: This site is subject to compliance of the City of Tucson Floodplain regulations. Add the appropriate note as noted above. (It is acknowledged that a LOMR will effective by June 13th, 2016.) See additional comments by the Engineering reviewer.

2-06.4.7.B.2.b - "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note.

12. COMMENT: As noted above in comment 11, this site is currently within a Floodplain and is subject to compliance with City of Tucson Floodplain regulations. Add the floodplain note as noted by the standard above.


2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

13. COMMENT: There are appears to be three (3) structures adjacent to the east line that has been depicted on the DP site plan with a distance and bearing. Draw the structures and indicate if these structures will be associated with the proposed use.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided.

14. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label any existing recorded easements that are within the overall site.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

15. COMMENT: Provide the dimensioned information as noted by the standard above for width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.
Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.

16. COMMENT: The location of the sewer or water connections could not be verified on the site plan.


2-06.4.8.I - Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated.

17. COMMENT: The floodplain limits shall be indicated on the site plan. (It is acknowledged that a LOMR is to be approved by June 13th, 2016 and the floodplain limits will change.)


2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements.

18. COMMENT: See related comments 4 and 9.


2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements.

19. COMMENT: Add the information as noted by the standard above. (This comment has been added as a caveat in the event that a lot split is proposed.)


2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review.

20. COMMENT: If applicable address the comment as noted above. See related comments 4, 9 and 18.


2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

21. COMMENT: Label the current zoning classification across 5th Street. The zoning is C-3.


2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation


2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections.
Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC).

22. COMMENT: Label the cross and horizontal slopes for the new accessible sidewalk/ramp location next to the proposed accessible parking spaces.


2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

23. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. Also dimension the on-street parking spaces, standard and accessible spaces.


2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

24. COMMENT: It is clear that only six on-street parking spaces are proposed for this development. Vehicle and Bicycle parking may be reduced pursuant to an IID parking plan in accordance with section 7.4.5.A.


2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

25. COMMENT: If any additional parking is to be provided other than what has been depicted on the site plan additional information as noted by the standard above shall be provided with the next submittal.


2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

26. COMMENT: This project is not required to provide a loading zone for the use under 25,000 sq. ft. However there is an existing loading ramp noted on the site plan. Clarify if there will be vehicle access provided to the loading ramp location. If so draw and label the access area and maneuverability.


2-06.4.9.N 6 - The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100 cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents.

27. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above. (It is acknowledged that a LOMR will effective by June 13th, 2016.)


2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

28. COMMENT: Draw and label the building setbacks .


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

29. COMMENT: The proposed DG for the pedestrian circulation does not meet the minimum requirements Composition requirements in the Technical Standards 7-01.4.3.C.6. Revise the note and drawing to provide the materials approved under section T. S. 7-01.4.3.C.1 - .4.


2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

30. COMMENT: It is understood that the refuse collection is currently on the northwest corner of the site.

Solid waste collection requirements must comply with COT Administrative Manual Section 8.01 et seq. for solid waste. (2)

Specific Standards
2. On-site refuse collection container requirements governing access, type, and location may be modified if the Environmental Services Dept. determines that no public health or traffic safety issues are created. Group solutions (multiple site, multiple owners) to refuse collection are encouraged.

If a modification to the solid waste collection is proposed under the IID plan, add the information as a note.


2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

31. COMMENT: If applicable, indicate on the site plan the location and type of any freestanding monument type signage.


2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

32. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comment related to landscape and screening requirements.

33. Verify that all keynotes are correctly placed on the site plan and pointing to the correct location or item. Example key note 6 on sheet 3, the keynote is for a "new concrete curb access ramp". The note has been noted in a couple of locations that are not applicable to the keynote.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please David Rivera, (520) 791-5550.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
05/11/2016 AHINES2 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve these plans
05/11/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change May 11, 2016
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0065
PROJECT NAME: Whistle Stop Depot
PROJECT ADDRESS: 115 West 5th Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Resubmittal Required TDOT does not recommend approval of the Site Plan; therefore a revised Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

1. Add three curb access ramps along sidewalk. Two shall be placed at adjacent driveway entrance to parking lot and one at the western end of sidewalk adjacent to 10th Avenue. Ensure driveway meets ADA slope requirements.

2. Add new sidewalk at proposed ADA parking area. Connect to existing sidewalk. Existing modified sidewalk is unacceptable.

3. Note. During construction inspector may require any substandard sidewalk that does not meet ADA requirements to be replaced.

4. A right of way permit will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information.



If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/12/2016 ANY REJECT SHELF RECEIVED