Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0057
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/13/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/13/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Passed | Review Comments provided in other ESD folder. |
| 04/13/2016 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subdivision does not require Architectural Variation Plan under 20 lots. Will require Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) per UDC Section 8.7. along the west property boundary adjacent to residential properties if proposed development is multi-story. The PMP can be provided at time of Building Plan submittal. |
| 04/15/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/18/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports the development’s acceptance. The development will not have any affect to any ADOT facilities because of its proposed location. Thank you. |
| 04/23/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | April 23, 2016 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Lee St Tentative Plat Development Plan Review - CDRC No. DP16-0057 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 2" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Santa Rosa Ave and may be impacted by pavement saw cutting along the east edge of Santa Rosa Ave, along with driveway grading into development. In addition there is a 2" gas main that is located in the right of way of Lee St. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6049 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Shawn Stoner Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) [See in PRO/SIRE] |
| 04/23/2016 | AHINES2 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | DP16-0057 Lee Street Tentative Plat/ FLD/ 1st Review is being Returned for Corrections. Please see the attached sticky notes for Addressing Comments (in PRO/SIRE). Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 04/23/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | [See document in PRO/SIRE] Here are my comments - DATE: 4/22/2016 CASE: DP16-0057 5025 E LEE ST - TENTATIVE PLAT / FLD COMMENT: No objections or adverse comments Daily PM Peak Vehicle Trip Generation: 86 9 Thanks, -Eric |
| 04/25/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 26, 2016 DUE DATE: May 10, 2016 SUBJECT: Tentative Plat/FLD TO: Paul Nzomo, PE LOCATION: 5025 E Lee Street REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP16-0057 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) The Geotechnical report appears to have several sections with typos and boiler plate from another project. Please see redlined geotechnical report and make appropriate corrections. Please submit redlined geotechnical report as a reference with the second submittal to accommodate back checking. 2) Detail 4 on sheet 2 of the Tentative plat should be updated to conform with the recommendations contained in sections 5.4 and 5.6.3 of the geotechnical report. This involves showing weepholes or perforated drain lines, positive slope away from the wall to eliminate fines from clogging the soil pores behind the wall and positive drainage at 5% for 10 feet away from the structure. A lot grading detail will be required to better show how the drainage away from both the structures and the retaining walls is balanced. See TSM 2-01.4.1C6 for code requirements. 3) Based on the description of the infiltration test in section 5.6.5 of the geotechnical report, a derating factor and a sidewall correction factor should be applied to get a developed conditions infiltration rate that can be used in design for retention. Update section 3.3 of the drainage report accordingly. See the detention/retention manual Section 3.5.1, item 5 (UDC 7.14.3) for regulatory requirements related to this comment. 4) The Geotechnical report lists the wrong address a number of times. It should be updated to 5025 E Lee Street. 5) The Table 6 from the City of Tucson Flood Insurance Study lists a 100-year flow of 2,566 cfs for the Arcadia Wash at Pima Street. Per equation 7.8a in section 7.6.1 of the Drainage Standards Manual (UDC 7.14.4) this would require an over 50 foot building erosion hazard setback from the top of bank. Since this would coincide with the line work for 50 foot study area, it is questionable whether lots 5, 8 or 9 are buildable. Please show a buildable area for each of these lots per Tucson Code Section 26-8(d). Per AM 2-06.5.3D all lots are required to show building footprints. 6) Per Tucson Code Section 26-8(b)1 and 4 and AM 2-06.4.9O please show the erosion hazard setback limits as part of the plat. Per Tucson Code Section 26-8(b)5 and AM 2-06.4.8I please show water surface elevations and include a general note which indicates the watershed area (2.43 square miles) and the base flood peak discharge (2,566 cfs). Please also include the line work for the water surface elevations in the legend. 7) Section 2.1 of the drainage report indicates the site is not impacted by offsite flow. Per AM 2-06.4.8E please show spot grades and contours within 50 feet of the site to show that the residential lots to the east drainage away from this site. The existing flow patterns that may pass through the chain link fences in existing conditions could be impeded by the new patio walls being called out by keynote 12 on sheet 1. Please also provide spot grades within the Arcadia Wash within 50 feet of the subdivision boundaries. 8) Per Section 5.2, item 1 of the Drainage Standards Manual (UDC 7.14.4) and TSM 2-01.4.1C4 please show offsite watershed from residential lots to the east and a flow value for this watershed. 9) Per AM 2-06.4.8H please show the existing ground slope of the adjacent properties. 10) Per AM 2-06.4.9N5 if a patio wall is going to divert drainage to the north instead of to the northwest then the adjacent property owners will need to provide permission. Providing the patio wall on the lot line should also be done with the adjacent owners permission. 11) General Note 26 is not legible. Please clarify. 12) Per TSM 10-01.3.2B3 a buffer of at least two feet is required between the back of wedge curbing and the sidewalk. Please update details 1, 2 and 3 on sheet 2 accordingly. 13) The first sentence of section 2.1 of the drainage report has a typo where it should say "…from the East to the West." Instead of "to the East to West." 14) Update Section 4.1 of the drainage report to indicate that a floodplain use permit will be required due to improvements proposed within the erosion hazard setback area. 15) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please provide the relevant case number (DP16-0057) adjacent to the title block area on each sheet. 16) Per AM 2-06.4.7A6C please add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riperian Area. 17) Per AM 2-06.4.7B2 list the following notes and complete the blanks as applicable for each of the impacted lots. a. "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. 18) Per AM 2-06.4.8C please show the adjacent right-of-way widths, recordation data and dimension the width of the paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. This includes showing the existing sidewalk to the east of this proposed development. 19) Per TSM 10-01.4.1A1a please show a proposed 5' wide sidewalk along the entire subdivision street frontage (ie. Lee Street) that ties into the existing sidewalk at the property boundary. Update section 4/2 to show the proposed sidewalk and existing curb. 20) Per AM 2-06.4.8G please identify the fences within 50 feet of the project limits. There appears to be line work that may have been carried over from the culture survey that is intended to represent the neighbor's chain link fences. This line work needs to be identified in the legend. The fences also need to be noted as either "to be retained" or "to be removed." There is also an existing block wall at the east property limits closer to Lee Street that needs to be notated accordingly. 21) Per AM 2-06.4.9A please draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. It appears some of the measurements for Common Areas A, C, D and E are missing. Please update as appropriate. 22) Per AM 2-06.4.9T please show vehicle maneuverability for refuse collection. Refer to TSM 8-01.0.0 for specific information. A TSMR may be needed if code compliant vehicle maneuverability is not shown. 23) Per AM 2-06.5.3G1 please provide 3 copies of the CC&Rs with the next submittal. 24) Since this site is larger than an acre a SWPPP is required. 25) Per TSM 10-01.6.2B3 the dead end street must be approved by TDOT or a cul-de-sac, "T" or "Y" intersection must be provided in accordance with TSM 10-01.6.2C.1 and 10-01.6.2.C.2. A TSMR may be required to avoid providing a turn around. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 04/29/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | SUBJECT: LEE STREET LOTS 1-9 DP16-0057 Tucson Electric Power Co., (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for Lee Street Lots 1-9 submitted on April 12, 2016. There are existing TEP overhead facilities within the boundaries of the plat. Any costs for removal or relocation of these facilities will be the responsibility of the developer. In order for TEP to prepare a preliminary electrical design for the subdivision, please provide the Approved Tentative Plat and AutoCad file for the project, including water plans. Easements for electrical facilities must be shown on the Final Plat in order for TEP to approve the plat. If you have any questions, please contact met at 520-917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQE613 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 05/02/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 05/03/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Lee Street Lots 1 - 9 Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0057 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 5, 2016 DUE DATE: May 10, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 04, 2016. 1. 2-06.4.2.B - The brief legal description state 'A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 3, 4 & 5 LYG SELY OF DRNGWY BLK 16 OF SPEEDWAY NO 2 BOOK 3, PG 98A". 2. 2-06.4.2.C - The title block should include the proposed common areas. 3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the tentative plat case number, DP16-0057, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Revise General Note 1 to include the square footage of the subdivision. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide a general note stating the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. This proposed use should be listed as Flexible Lot Development Subject to UDC Article 8.7.3. Also include which development alternative you are using for this subdivision, see UDC Article 8.7.3.C.3. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Remove Development Data note 3 from the plan as it is not applicable. 7. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) will be required for this project provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet and provide a general note stating the TSMR case number, date of approval, what was modified and any conditions of approval. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - Once the subdivision case number has been established, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. 9. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - It does not appear that the site coverage is correct. This site coverage includes the building footprint worst case, see UDC Article 6.4.3 10. 2-06.4.8.C - Provide the following information for Lee Street, dimensioned width of paving, curbs. 11. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - As you are proposing to eliminate sidewalk from a portion of the proposed private street and this does not match any of the standard cross sections in TSM Section 10-01.9.0 a TSMR is required, see TSM Section 1-01.6.0. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Demonstrate on the plan how a physically challenged person will be able to access lots 6 - 9 from the proposed visitors parking and lots 1 - 5 without having to go out to Lee Street and back in to the subdivision. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009 are met for all proposed sidewalks. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Provide a note on the plan stating that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Provide details for all proposed accessible ramps shown on the plan. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.7 - As the proposed visitors vehicle parking backing out in to the proposed private street does not meet any of the standard cross sections in TSM Section 10-01.9.0 a TSMR is required. 18. 2-06.4.9.H.7 - As the proposed private street does not meet any of the standard cross sections in TSM Section 10-01.9.0 a TSMR is required. 19. 2-06.5.2.A - Provide as a general note a developable area calculation for the entire FLD. 20. 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 21. 2-06.5.3.A Provide a typical perimeter yard setback detail on the plans 22. 2-06.5.3.B - The provided density calculation is not correct. Depending on the proposed Development Alternative per UDC Table the allowed density is either 8.71 or 22.00 per acre. 23. 2-06.5.3.D - Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. 24. 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation may be required if two story homes are proposed along the east boarder of the subdivision. When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows:2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation: 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and, 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; 25. 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 26. Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE INCLUSIVE HOME ORDINANCE - CITY OF TUCSON ORDINANCE 10463." 27. There is a table located on sheet 1 in the lower left hand corner that references incorrect information. i.e. "FLD-4" & "PER. YARD BB" review the UDC and provide the applicable information or remove the table from the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/05/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system (e.g. lots 3, 4, 6, and7), a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/05/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/05/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of the Development Plan submitted for the tentative plat for residential lot Nos. 1 through 9 off of Lee Street in Tucson. Arizona. In accordance with TSM 8-01.5.3.F., the maximum back-up distance for the collection vehicle is 80 feet measured from the front of the collection vehicle. For the residential service for Lots 4 and 5 along Wang Court, the collection vehicle would have to back-up greater than 80 feet in order to turn around and resume servicing other residential properties. Similarly, for the residential service for Lots 8 and 9 along Ching Court, the collection vehicle would have to back-up greater than 80 feet in order to service these lots. In order to avoid these excessive back-up distances, the APCs for Lots 4 and 5 would have to be rolled to Lot 3 for pick-up on the day of service. The APCs for Lots 8 and 9 would have to be rolled to Lot 7 also for pick-up on the day of service. The APCs must have a spacing of three feet when placed behind the curb for pick-up. A 95 gallon APC is 2.5 feet in diameter. The applicant shall show the location of the APCs, including the spacing between containers, on Lots 3 and 7 on the revised Development Plan. The collection vehicle must back-up from Wang Court to Lot 7 to service the APCs at Lot 7. This distance is greater than 80 feet and, therefore, a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR) would need to be submitted for ES review and approval. The APCs must be rolled out to the back of the curb for pick-up on the day of service and rolled back to the residence after servicing on the same day. The APCs must be screened from public view and from adjacent developments. The storage location for the APCs should be stated in a note on the Development Plan. In addition, the method of screening the APCs from public view should be described on the Development Plan. In summary, the locations of the APCs on Lots 3 and 7 and notes for the storage location and method of screening from public view of the APCs shall be shown on a resubmittal of the Development Plans. A TMSR for the excessive back-up distance shall also be submitted for review and approval. Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 05/09/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b Street landscape borders for residential subdivisions of eight or more lots shall conform to the following standards. (1) Street landscape borders are only required along the exterior boundaries of subdivisions. Landscape borders are not required along front yard street frontages. (2) Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. (3) The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section. 2) UDC 8.7.3.G. Detention and Retention Basins 1. To the greatest degree practicable, detention and retention basins within an FLD shall be designed as Functional Open Space by incorporating the Multiple-Use Concepts and Aesthetic Design Guidelines described in Chapter IV of the Stormwater Detention/Retention Manual, the Floodplain Ordinance, and in accordance with UDC Section 7.6.6.C, Stormwater Runoff. 3) UDC 8.7.3..H. Landscaping, Screening and Wall Requirements 1. FLD projects shall comply with Section 7.6, Landscaping and Screening Standards, except as otherwise provided by this section. 2. One canopy tree shall be provided every 40 feet of pedestrian circulation systems, excluding crossings with streets, alleys, and driveways. If providing canopy trees every 40 feet is not achievable, the applicant shall: a. Provide the equivalent number of trees that would be obtained using the 40-foot increment measure; and, b. Distribute the trees within the FLD project site along pedestrian circulation systems and within functional open space areas. 4) UDC 8.7.3..H.4. Water harvesting techniques shall be incorporated as part of the landscape design based on the Water Harvesting Guidance Manual prepared for the City of Tucson Transportation Department Stormwater Section. 5) UDC 8.7.3..H.5. Mechanical equipment, utility boxes, irrigation equipment and similar elements shall be screened from adjacent streets exterior to the project and from adjacent existing residential development. Screening shall be architecturally integrated with the overall design of the FLD. 6) UDC 8.7.3..H.6. If a perimeter wall is proposed along an existing public right-of-way, it shall be constructed of, or painted with, graffiti-resistant materials. The wall shall incorporate one or more of the following decorative materials: a. Tile; b. Stone; c. Brick; d. Adobe; e. A textured material such as stucco or plaster; or, f. Metal. 7) Revise the landscape plan to include slope ratios for retention and detention basins. Basin slopes in most instances are required to have slopes no steeper than 4:1 where depths exceed three feet; 3:1 for unprotected slopes and 2: 1 for protected slopes for depths less than three feet. DS 10-01.4 |
| 05/09/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 05/09/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/09/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/10/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson Development Services FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: May 10, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Final Plat- Tentative Plat * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _X____ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " The title block must be in the lower right hand corner. It must have the number of Lots or Units or Blocks or any combination of these. It must have the common areas listed, if there are any. It must have the Section, Township and Range and if it is a resubdivision, it must mention the plat name and the Map and Plat. " There must be a Section Tie, with a bearing and dimension from the Section corner or Quarter corner to the Point of Tie on the subdivision. " The perimeter line must be solid and heaviest line weight on the plat. The lot lines and common area lines must be solid and the next heaviest. Lines for erosion setbacks, floodplain lines etc. should be the lightest line weight and be dashed or dot-dashed. " There must be bearings and dimensions for the perimeter and all lot lines and all common areas. " All hatching, stippling, striping etc., must be removed in the final plat, unless another agency requires it. If so all lettering must have the hatching, etc., cut away so they are legible. " Ownership doesn't match the owner of Crossover LLC on the map. The current owner is Trinity Developments LLC 50% and Ashes Investments LP 50%. A Deed must be recorded if Crossover LLC is going to sign as Owner. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 05/10/2016 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 05/10/2016 | AHINES2 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | See letter in PRO/SIRE. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/12/2016 | ARUIZ1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |