Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0054
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2016 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/31/2016 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Needs Review | This project requires Infill Incentive District (IID) review per UDC Section 5.12. |
| 04/05/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | . |
| 04/19/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: 416 E. 9th Street Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0054 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 19, 2016 DUE DATE: April 27, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 28, 2016. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP16-0054, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide the IID case number adjacent to the title block on each sheet. As a general note provide the IID case number date of approval, and any conditions of approval. 3. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Based on the proposed vehicle parking, 55 required. 0 provided the IID will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The proposed short term bicycle parking calculation, 2 required 0 provided, does not meet the requirements of UDC Table 5.12-DLS-5 or UDC Table 7.4.8-1. Per UDC Table 5.12-DLS-5, SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS "2" bicycle parking may not be eliminated. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The proposed long term bicycle parking calculation, 2 required 0 provided, does not meet the requirements of UDC Table 5.12-DLS-5 or UDC Table 7.4.8-1. Per UDC Table 5.12-DLS-5, SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS "2" bicycle parking may not be eliminated. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The location of the short term bicycle parking does not appear to meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.C.2.a. 7. 2-06.4.9.O - Clarify what the 8' perimeter yard setback to the south property line is based on. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/19/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the invert and rim elevations of the upstream manhole, 8235-02. If the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole is higher than the first floor elevation or is less than 12" below the first floor elevation, provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 04/19/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/20/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/25/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this review. Thanks, Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 04/28/2016 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 04/28/2016 | AHINES2 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of the Development Plan submittal for the Wine Bar property located at 416 E. 9th Street in Tucson. ES agrees with the waste generation rate of 200 gallons per week at this facility. The use of two 95 gallon APCs for refuse and two 95 gallon APCs for recycling materials is approved with servicing once per week. The APCs must be screened from public view and from adjacent developments. The storage location for the APCs should be stated in a note on the Development Plan. In addition, the method of screening the APCs from public view should be described on the Development Plan. Let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |