Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0049
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/22/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/22/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building or as a separate permit. 2. The presence of manholes in the proposed revision to the building sewer system will require review of the sewer design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the design to PDEQ at 150 W Congress St, 1st Floor (520-724-7382). 3. The size of a gravity grease interceptor is required to be determined using the method described in Section 1003.3, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. Over-sizing the gravity grease interceptor can lead to odor problems and can require the use of multiple trucks to service to interceptor. 4. Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed directly after the domestic water meter for buildings that have food service facilities or licensed personal care facilities). Reference: Chapter XXVII, Article V, Section 27-72, the Tucson Code, http://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf |
| 03/22/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | September 30, 2015 The Planning Center 110 S Church St., Ste #6320 Tucson, AZ 85701 Attn: Brian Underwood SUBJECT: Water Availability for project: 5151 E. Pima St., APN: 12109006A, Case #: WA1824, T-14, R-14, SEC-02, Lots: 9999, Location Code: TUC, Total Area: 8.5ac Zoning: R-1 WATER SUPPLY Tucson Water will provide water service to this project based on the subject zoning of the above parcels. Tucson Water has an assured water supply (AWS) designation from the State of Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR). An AWS designation means Tucson Water has met the criteria established by ADWR for demonstration of a 100-year water supply - it does not mean that water service is currently available to the subject project. WATER SERVICE The approval of water meter applications is subject to the current availability of water service at the time an application is received. The developer shall be required to submit a water master plan identifying, but not limited to: 1) Water Use; 2) Fire Flow Requirements; 3) Offsite/Onsite Water Facilities; 4) Loops and Proposed Connection Points to Existing Water System; and 5) Easements/Common Areas. Any specific area plan fees, protected main/facility fees and/or other needed facilities' cost, are to be paid by the developer. If the existing water system is not capable of meeting the requirements of the proposed development, the developer shall be financially responsible for modifying or enhancing the existing water system to meet those needs. This letter shall be null and void two years from the date of issuance. Issuance of this letter is not to be construed as agency approval of a water plan or as containing construction review comments relative to conflicts with existing water lines and the proposed development. If you have any questions, please call New Development at 791-4718. Sincerely, Richard A. Sarti, P.E. Engineering Manager Tucson Water Department RS:ka CC:File |
| 03/22/2016 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | SHEET 8 INDICATES A KEY NOTE 19 REGARDING A NEW FIRE HYDRANT. IT IS NOT SHOWN AND IT IS REQUIRED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF IFC SECTION 507.5 OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE. |
| 03/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this. Thank you, Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 03/23/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0049 Mainstreet Health and Wellness Suites 3/23/16 () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan X() Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: (X) Denied () No Resubmittal Required: (X) Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: jb/msp DATE: 3/23/16 COMMENTS 1. Development Plan DP16-0049 is subject to Rezoning C9-15-07 and Special Exception SE-15-83 conditions. " Development Package, sheet 2 of 28, as part of "ZONING CONDITIONS" title area, please correct C9-15-0 to C9-15-07; " Condition 9 requires "Outdoor security light layout and light fixture detail shall be submitted as part of the development package. Please revise development package to provide keynote and location of site security lighting including security lighting in parking lot areas. " Condition 15, requires wall cross-section(s) and elevation(s) drawn to scale, for any proposed or required free standing perimeter wall (See Condition 15 for entire condition requirements); " Condition 17, the last sentence of the condition stipulates the following; the screen wall shall be at any given point no less than three (3) feet from the north property line. Please correct development package to comply. Current design shows wall minimum one foot, maximum three feet from property line. In addition, please correct keynote to match requirements of condition 17. " Condition 21, Development Package to include four-side building elevations (see Condition 21 for entire condition requirements); " Condition 24, requires the following; one tree for every twenty-five feet along the length of the north property line. Spacing, staggering and grouping of trees is supported along the north perimeter to create a more natural native tree growth pattern. Please correct or add key note to address this requirement of tree count along the north perimeter. " Condition 34 requires the one-foot no vehicular access easement to be recorded and Recorder's sequence number to be provided on DP. " Prior to Development Package submittal, location of existing bus stop and proposed driveway/access point onto Pima Street shall be reviewed and approved by City of Tucson, Department of Transportation. Please provide documentation that this condition has been met. |
| 03/23/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Trish, The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of the development package for the proposed Transitional Care Facility to be located at 5151 Pima Street in the City of Tucson. The proposed facility will consist of a 47,300 square foot single story transitional care building. Limited information concerning solid waste storage and collection was provided in this submittal. The following information will need to be addressed in the resubmittal: •Per TSM 8-01.4.0.B, add a general note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated waste stream tonnage from Table 1 for the intended use. See TSM 8-01.8.0 for the waste stream calculation guidelines. •The location of the enclosures for the refuse and recycling containers are not identified on the plans. Please denote their locations so that adequate access and service vehicle maneuverability as specified in TSM 8-01.5.3 can be reviewed and verified. •Provide details of the enclosures to demonstrate compliance with the figures in TSM 8-01.9.0 and the standards in TSM 8-01.5.2. Because limited information was provided in this submittal, there may be additional comments once the above items have been added to the plans. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 03/24/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/24/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/24/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | There are still pending Rezoning and Special Exception cases for this project. Additional comments may be forthcoming after the conditions are finalized and adopted. Drainage Report 1. Provide the correct address on the cover of the Drainage Report. 2. As indicated in the comments for the Special Exception and Rezoning processes, there may be significant drainage discharges in the streets on both sides of the project location. Generally the storm drain system within the City is designed for relatively high frequency storms and may not be protective for less frequent storms. a. Provide a complete analysis of the flows within Rosemont Boulevard and within Magnolia Avenue. b. If the discharge is not fully contained within the right-of-way, provide a demonstration of no adverse impact from this project on nearby properties. c. Provide water surface contours for the flows within the adjacent streets. Adjacent structures should also be shown with adequate freeboard. Development Package 1. Clearly indicate that all landscape areas will be depressed for water harvesting. 2. Provide general dimensions for all basins and other features on the site. |
| 03/24/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in SIRE/PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 03/24/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mainstreet Health and Wellness Suites Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0049 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 24, 2016 DUE DATE: March 24, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 20, 2016. 1. 2-06.4.2.D - Sheet NPPP-1 & NPPP-2 do not list the page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0049, adjacent to the title block on each sheet . 3. 2-06.4.3 - Remove the street address from the title block and provide adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Revise Development Package General Note 3 to reading "EXISTING USE EDUCATION USE - ELEMENTARY, PROPOSED USE MEDICAL SERVICES - EXTENDED HEALTHCARE, EXCLUDING BLOOD DONOR CENTER, SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.4.O.2 and 4.9.4.P.1, 2.a, 3, & .4". 5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 6. 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Remove the ref to "% COVERAGE OF LOT …." From the plan as it is not applicable. 7. 2-06.4.8.A - There are two sets of distances listed for the north/south property lines, clarify what the smaller numbers, see yellow highlight sheets 4 & 5 are. 8. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. a. There are two (2) areas where the pavement and sidewalk are flush, along the north and west side of the proposed building that require some type of barrier to prevent vehicles from accessing the sidewalk in this area. b. The access lane north of the building that will provide access to the second phase will require some type of barrier to prevent vehicle from accessing the unimproved portion of the site. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide access lane width dimensions for the entrance off of Rosemont. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The provided vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Per UDC Table 7.4.4-1 Commercial Use Group, Medical Service - Extended Health Care, the requirement is 1 space per 2 beds for a total required of 32. Revise the calculation to show the correct ratio of 1 space per 2 beds and 32 spaces required. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per IBC Section 1106.4 the provided number of accessible vehicle parking spaces is not correct. 76 vehicle parking spaces provided time 20% would require 15 accessible vehicle parking spaces. Dispersed and located near all accessible entrances, see IBC Section 1106.6. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 3 sheet 10 the dimension shown to the bottom of the sign should be 7'-0" this also includes the accessible sign. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 1 sheet 10 the wheel stop location dimension is not shown correctly, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The ratio shown for the short term bicycle parking, "0.5" is not correct and should be listed as 0.05. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Provide a short-term bicycle parking detail that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B1.b, .c, .e, 7.4.9..B.2.a, .d, & .f are met 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d -Detail 5 sheet 10 demonstrate how the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.e are met. 18. 2-06.4.9.Q - Clarify what the "28' TOWER" called out within the footprint of the building on sheet 4 is for. 19. 2-06.4.9.Q - Show all shade structures on sheet 4. 20. 2-06.4.9.U - Per re-zoning condition 15 provide the wall cross-section and elevations with your next submittal. 21. 2-06.4.9.U - Per re-zoning condition 17 provide the recorded wall agreement with your next submittal. 22. 2-06.4.9.U - Per re-zoning condition 21 provide the building elevations with your next submittal. 23. 2-06.4.9.U - Demonstrate on the how you are proposing to meet re-zoning condition 29. Following discussions with staff a request to eliminate condition 29 would be appropriate. Contact John Beall (520) 837-6966 or Manny Padilla (520) 837-6971for requirements and procedure to eliminate condition 29. 24. 2-06.4.9.U - Per re-zoning condition 34 provide the recordation information for the no access easement shown under keynote 31. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/24/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. Note: Development Package can not be approved until re-zoning is approved and appeal period has passed. Calculations Pima St. buffer calculation. Maintenance Schedule Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required; Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive; Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials; Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and, Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems. Indicate natural contours of undisturbed areas; Areas of detention/retention, depths of basins, and percentage of side slope; Water Harvesting Implementation Plan Site Water Budget shall include calculations showing how 50 percent of landscape water demand as an average across the site will be met using harvested rainwater, and shall include assumptions and supporting calculations as necessary to document these outputs. Provide correct percent to total site annual landscape demand met using harvested water Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/25/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/25/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | Facility Map is in PRO/SIRE 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#6113231 March 24, 2016 CALEXANDER@MAININVEST.COM Dear Christopher: SUBJECT: MAINSTREET HEALTH AND WELLNESS SUITES DP16-0049 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 22, 2016. There appears to be a conflict with the existing transformer to serves the existing school. In addition, there appears to be a conflict with an existing power pole along Rosemont and a proposed entrance into the development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Josh Necas at (520) 917-8759. Sincerely, Mike Norris Scheduling Coordinator Design |
| 03/25/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | March 28, 2016 To: Ted Luther, PE Cole Design Group, Inc ____________________________________ From: Tom Porter, P.E., PCRWRD (520) 724-6719 Subject: MAINSTREET HEALTH & WELLNESS SUITES DP16-0049(P16WS00025) PSL- 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2016. 1. Sheet 1: Remove General Note #10. 2. Sheet 8: Call out the rim elevation for proposed MH #2. 3. Sheet 8: For maintenance vehicle access call out for depressed curb on Magnolia Ave fronting the proposed MH #2 and for increased sidewalk thickness to 6" per EDS 2016 Sec.7.6. 4. Sheet 8: The proposed on-site 8" private pipe may prove to be excessive per PDEQ and UPC Building Code review. A smaller pipe and higher slope may be required. 5. Sheet 8: Why are you proposing the sewer invert immediately outside the building as 7' below the finished pad elevation? Also have you considered draining the sewer directly south to possibly MH #8495-09 in Pima Rd? This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2012 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2012. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $100.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD Erica Sanchez RWRD Gerry Koziol RWRD |
| 03/25/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Passed | Review not needed per Okay to submit form |
| 03/25/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/25/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/29/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/30/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/08/2016 | RBENT1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 04/08/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/08/2016 | RBENT1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |