Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - REVISION
Permit Number - DP16-0042
Review Name: DEV PKG - REVISION
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2017 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/17/2017 | ALEXANDRA HINES | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The revised Development Package for No Anchovies restaurant (DP16-0042) has been reviewed by the Environmental and General Services Department. The Development Package consisted of two plan sheets identified as SP1.0 and SP2.0. The Development Package should be revised to address the following: •As shown on the site plan on Sheet SP1.0, the existing building has 3,705 square feet of floor area and the proposed addition will have 5,453 square feet of floor area. The new building total will have 9,158 square feet of floor area. Under the Code Tabulations on Sheet SP1.0, the waste generation calculation uses 8,718 square feet of floor area. Why is this and revise this calculation, if necessary. •Section 8-01.4.0 requires that the Development Package include a note specifying the anticipated method of collection and the collection frequency. Please add these notes to the site figures. •Is it proposed that the refuse service vehicle access the waste enclosure? If so, Section 8-01.5.2 G requires that the concrete service apron slope a minimum of 2% away from the enclosure to prevent storm water from collecting in front of the enclosure. Section 8-01.5.3 B requires that a minimum safe access and operational area of 14 feet by 40 feet, with a minimum vertical clearance of 25 feet, shall be provided in front of each enclosure. Section 8-01.5.3 G discusses providing service access from an adjacent right=of-way. If the refuse service vehicle will access the waste enclosure, the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed design complies with Section 8-01.5.2 G, Section 8-01.5.3 B and Section 8-01.5.3 G. •In the Dumpster Requirements on Sheet SP1.0, it is stated that one 4 cubic yard dumpster will be adequate. Based on the waste generation calculations, this is correct. However, is recycling proposed for this site? If so, will two metal containers be needed? The applicant shall address the management of recycle materials for this site. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental and General Services Department |
| 07/18/2017 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/18/2017 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: No Anchovies Development Package (Revision) DP16-0042 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 18, 2017 DUE DATE: August 3, 2017 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 10, 2016. 1. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As changes to the site are proposed this revision will need to be reviewed by Historic and Main Gate prior to approval. Contact Michael Taku for Historic and Carolyn Laurie for Main Gate. Once all above comments have been addressed Zoning will provide and over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/19/2017 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Per MGD. Please provide elevation drawings and material choices for new enclosure. |
| 07/31/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/31/2017 | KELLY LEE | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/20/2018 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |