Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP16-0042
Parcel: 12405051A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP16-0042
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/23/2016 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
04/04/2016 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
04/04/2016 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

The site plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

ARTICLE 5: OVERLAY ZONES

This site is zoned HC-1 the following applies:

5.8. "H" HISTORIC PRESERVATION ZONE (HPZ)

Landscaping

Plantings and other ornamental features shall reflect the historic period of the subject structure. Landscaping may be reviewed in the context of a required HPZ review; landscaping alone shall not be considered through an HPZ review.

PDSD Director Decision

The PDSD Director reviews the application and decides whether to approve, approve with conditions, deny, or refer the application back for additional review/recommendation based on revisions to the original proposal. The PDSD Director shall consider the recommendations of the HPZ Advisory Board and the TPCHC Plans Review Subcommittee when considering a decision.

Include with re-submittal historic review approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the case number, date of approval, and include conditions imposed.

Additional comments may apply
04/04/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Principal Planner

PROJECT: No Anchovies
Development Package (1st Review)
DP16-0042

TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 5, 2016

DUE DATE: April 5, 2016

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 10, 2016.


1. 2-06.3.12 - Provide a sheet index on the first sheet.

2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0042, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide all other applicable case numbers, Main Gate, Historic, etc., adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

4. 2-06.4.4 - The provided location map is not to scale.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Provide a general note stating "PROPOSED ZONING U-1 MAIN GATE UOD".

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide all other applicable case numbers, Main Gate, Historic, etc., adjacent to the title block on each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

7. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Table 7.4.6-1 the minimum PAAL width when accessing 90 degree parking is 24'-0". The proposed "20.86'" PAAL does not meet this requirement.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said provide some type of barrier along the east side of the parking area to prevent vehicles from accessing the proposed landscape area.

10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - It appears that the proposed accessible vehicle parking space sign encroaches into 2'-6" vehicle overhang, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

11. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 Back-Up Spurs are required at the end of a row of parking if no ingress or egress is provided at that end. That said demonstrate on the plan that the total 6' of back-up spur is provided.

12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. The gross floor area includes the outdoor seating areas, 10,830/1000 = 11 spaces required.

13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Indicate the proposed cross slope for the accessible vehicle parking space and access aisle on the plan.

14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established.

15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. The gross floor area includes the outdoor seating areas, 10,830. The calculation should show the required Short term 10,830/5,000 = 2 and Long term 10830/12,000 = 2 minimum.

16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d -Keynote 8 Sheet 1 calls out "EXISTING BICYCLE PARKING TO REMAIN". Keynote 8 is shown under a table. Show the location of the required short and long term bicycle parking on the plan and provide a detail that demonstrates that the short and long term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Articles 7.4.9.B, .C & .D.

17. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a width dimension for the ramp shown along the east side of the building.

18. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide a cross slope for the ramp shown along the east side of the building.

19. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly show how a disabled person will access the building from the proposed accessible vehicle parking space.

20. 2-06.4.9.R - Clearly show how a disabled person will access the building from the sidewalk located along University Blvd.

21. 2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

22. 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. Provide a note on the plan that all signage requires a separate permit.

Additional comments

23. The project is located in the HC-1 zone, and you have elected to use the Main Gate UDO, and the project is three stories or greater you need to contact Frank Dillon for historic, overlay and design review submittal requirements. All historic and overlay reviews must be completed prior to approval of the development package.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
04/05/2016 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
04/05/2016 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show location of solid waste containers and access for service vehicles. If facilities are to be shared with adjacent property, show location and access routes and provide copies of joint use agreement with recordation. (AM 2-06.4.9.T)
2. Show grades or ground surface elevation contours for the site and the adjacent area to demonstrate there will be no adverse impact. Include roof drainage patterns. (AM 2-06.4.9.N. and AM 2-06.4.8.F and H.)
3. Clearly indicate all landscape areas will be depressed a minimum of 6 inches for water harvesting.
4. The area labeled as Alley is owned by the Board of Regents. Provide documentation from the BoR showing permission to access the site across their property.
04/05/2016 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
04/07/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the floor elevations for the basement and the first floor of the new building. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
04/13/2016 AHINES2 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
04/13/2016 AHINES2 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
04/13/2016 AHINES2 REJECT SHELF Completed