Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP16-0041
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/06/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Principal Planner PROJECT: Shoppes at 1st and Roger Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0041 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 6, 2016 DUE DATE: April 5, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 20, 2016. 1. 2-06.3.5 - Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package. 2. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 3. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 4. 2-06.4.7.A.2 - Provide the square footage and acreage for the entire site, see comment 8. 5. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Provide the Use Specific Standards listed for General Merchandise Sales in the C-1 Zone, see UDC Table PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES, Retail Trade Use Group With Land Use Class/Type: adjacent to the proposed use listed on the plan. 6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)." 7. 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 8. 2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met. 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide width dimensions for the proposed drive-thru. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.a.(2) Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least one foot from: A structure when the access lane or PAAL serves as a drive-through lane. That said show the required 1'-0" setback at the drive-thur. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - The vehicle parking space calculation should include the number required and provided for accessible vehicle parking. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As it appears that you are proposing new accessible vehicle parking the accessible parking must meet the requirements of IBC Chapter 11 and the ICC A117.1-2009. That said per ICC Section 502.4.1 the access aisle for van accessible vehicle parking spaces must be located on the passenger side of the parking space. 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a detail for the proposed wheel stops shown on the plan, see UDC Article 7.4.6.4.3. 14. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Provide a height dimension form the bottom of the van accessible sign. This dimension should be 7'-0". 15. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As a lot split has been processed for this project provide a copy of the recorded cross access/parking agreement with your next submittal. 16. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Remove all references to Class 1 & 2 from the plan as it is no longer applicable. 17. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Remove all references to DEV. STD 2-09 from the plan as it is no longer applicable. 18. 2-06.4.9.R - Detail A sheet 4 remove the detectable warning device requirement as it is not applicable. 19. 2-06.4.9.U - Provide written documentation from John Beall that the requirements of rezoning condition 14 do not apply to this development. 20. 2-06.4.9.W - If applicable indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 21. 2-06.4.9.W - Provide a note on the plan stating all signage requires a separate permit. Additional comments 22. Sheet 3 remove all underlying line work, parking striping that is to be removed from the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/06/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 04/06/2016 | SSHIELD1 | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 04/07/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | Applicant is required to provide documentation that they meet Condition 14. Please provide documentation that an offer was made to meet with affected neighborhood associations and property owners a minimum of one week (7days) prior to submitting. Please provide docuemntation of any meeting or correspondence, and a summary of that meeting or correspondence. |
| 04/07/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) AM 2-10.2.0 A landscape plan is required to be submitted with all applications for land development:Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. 2) Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval. Submit a copy of the approved landscape plans for the site to document code compliance. |
| 04/07/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. Clarify the size of the project site. The drainage statement indicates a 20-acre site. The notes on the cover sheet indicate a 1.42-acre site. The Pima County Assessor indicates a 9.59-acre site. Since this is a shopping center development the entire site must be included. 2. The numbering of the notes is incorrect. Not all notes are numbered and the numbers are in some random order. Please correct. 3. In note 13, 9 or 11 the floodplain effective date is incorrect. The effective date of the L panels is June 16, 2011 as indicated in the drainage statement. 4. Keynotes 56 and 4on sheet 3 indicate a 4-inch or 5-inch curb at specified locations. Where the curb separates the vehicle use area from a sidewalk, the curb must be at least 6 inches. TSM 7-01.4.2.A 5. For the planter areas indicated by keynote 53, provide curb openings or other means to direct stormwater runoff to the water harvesting areas. If possible, direct the roof drains to water harvesting areas. UDC 7.6.6.C |
| 04/08/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 04/09/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | WRITE DECISION LETTER | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items required by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/27/2016 | AHINES2 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 04/27/2016 | AHINES2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 04/27/2016 | AHINES2 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |