Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP16-0027
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/20/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approved | First review informational only. |
| 05/10/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Banner Medical Center - Tucson - Expansion & Renovation Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 11, 2016 DUE DATE: May 18, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 10, 2016. 1. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet CS114 northern vehicle parking area where a 20' wide parking area access lane (PAAL) is proposed. Per UDC Table 4.9.6.-1, 90 degree parking, the minimum PAAL width for access to 90 degree parking is 24'. Zoning recommendation would be to make a minor revision to the PAD that would allow for the compact vehicle parking spaces or allow for the reduced PAAL width or both. Contact John Beall for requirements for the minor change to the PAD. 2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 2 sheet CS501 shows a distance of 4'-0" from center of rack to center of rack. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f and Figure 7.4.9-C the distance should be 4'-0" Clear. Once the above comments have been addressed Zoning will provide an over the counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 05/11/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/17/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0027 UMC Banner 5/17/16 () Minor Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: jb DATE: 5/17/16 The following COMMENTS need to be addressed as outlined in the PAD - 1. Per the PAD document Section III.F Conservation Measure & Environmental Considerations, the applicant is to include with submittal of Development Package or with the submittal of architectural plans for building permits a letter detailing the particular measures employed in final design to: " Address and promote the Conservation Measures and Environmental Considerations found in the PAD document; " Demonstrate that Banner Health is achieving progress towards various sustainability goals outlines in the PAD; " Provide results for Rainwater harvesting provisions as found in PAD Section III.B.3.J; " The landscape-related Potable Water Conservation Standards found in PAD Section III.F.1.B; " Heat island Considerations & Mitigation Measures as found in PAD Section III.F.2. 2. Note that accompanying future architectural plan submittals for building permits should provide: " Energy Efficiency Provisions and Standards found in PAD Section III.F.1.A; " The building-related Potable Water Conservation Standards as found in PAD Section III.F.1.B. 3. Provide self-certification letter at time of building permits from architect of record, signed and sealed, certifying that the plans are in general conformance with the PAD prescriptions articulated in Sections III.G.1 and III.G.2. |
| 05/17/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | . |
| 05/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Patricia and Alex, I would like to revise the previous comment response below. I have come to realize extending the wall will most likely create sight visibility issues between service vehicles entering and exiting the service area and the traffic on Adams Street . I apologize for the inconvenience, but please revise the response to read: The Development Plan has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. is approved. Thank you, Ken |
| 05/19/2016 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/02/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |