Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0027
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/16/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | A separate permit is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system, private manholes, and sanitary lift stations. |
| 02/17/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | ADOT Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments and recommends proceeding with the proposed rezoning. The parcel is not on ADOT right-of-way. Thank you, Becca Bunker ADOT Regional Traffic From: Tom Martinez Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 8:29 AM To: Rebecca Bunker Subject: FW: DP16-0027/UMC Banner Comment? |
| 02/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 02/24/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | TEP facilities map is in PRO/SIRE 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#6109732 February 24, 2016 GLHN ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS, INC ATTN: JOHN MCGANN 333 E WETMORE RD, 280 TUCSON, AZ 85705 Dear John Mcgann: SUBJECT: UMC BANNER DP16-0027 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted February 16, 2016. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development and the facilities will need to be relocated. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918- 8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Josh Necas at (520) 917-8759. Mike Norris Scheduling Coordinator Design |
| 03/07/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | March 9, 2016 The Drainage Report is accepted for this project. The following changes should be addressed. 1. Sheet 11 Keynote 36 is truncated. Check this and all other notes for correctness. 2. Sheet 12 Keynote 19: clarify the sign modification and provide correct detail reference. The referenced detail is for sidewalk, retaining wall and safety rail. Also correct other sheets where this note is used. 3. Also note that all signs will be by separate sign permits. 4. Clarify the status of Elm Street. Sheet 18 indicates Elm as public and Sheet 4 seems to indicate private. 5. Confirm the status of Chauncey Street as well. It is labeled as both private and public on separate sheets. 6. Several sheets show construction activities in the private section of Cherry Avenue. If Cherry Avenue is retained by the Board of Regents, provide permissions to construct improvements on ABOR property. 7. Sheet 23: confirm the locations and description of HVAC equipment indicated by keynote 125. 8. On Sheet 49, keynote seven is used in the plan but not included in the list of notes. |
| 03/07/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Reqs Change | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP16-0027 UMC Banner 3/8/16 () Minor Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () Approval (X) No Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: jb DATE: 3/8/16 COMMENTS 1. Per the PAD document Section III.F Conservation Measure & Environmental Considerations, the applicant is to include with submittal of Development Package or with the submittal of architectural plans for building permits a letter detailing the particular measures employed in final design to: " Address and promote the Conservation Measures and Environmental Considerations found in the PAD document; " Demonstrate that Banner Health is achieving progress towards various sustainability goals outlines in the PAD; " Provide results for Rainwater harvesting provisions as found in PAD Section III.B.3.J; " The landscape-related Potable Water Conservation Standards found in PAD Section III.F.1.B; " Heat island Considerations & Mitigation Measures as found in PAD Section III.F.2. 2. Note that accompanying future architectural plan submittals for building permits should provide: " Energy Efficiency Provisions and Standards found in PAD Section III.F.1.A; " The building-related Potable Water Conservation Standards as found in PAD Section III.F.1.B. 3. Provide self-certification letter at time of building permits from architect of record, signed and sealed, certifying that the plans are in general conformance with the PAD prescriptions articulated in Sections III.G.1 and III.G.2. |
| 03/09/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | The above project has been “approved” by Pima County Addressing 03/09/16. |
| 03/09/2016 | ARUIZ1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | Trish, The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our initial review of the Development Package Application materials for the proposed UMC - Banner hospital campus to be located in downtown Tucson. Specifically, the proposed hospital campus will be located on the west side of N. Campbell Avenue between Speedway Boulevard and E. Grant Road. The hospital campus is approximately 33 acres in size. The location of the proposed development on the University of Arizona campus provides sufficient access for City of Tucson waste collection vehicles, private waste hauling companies and private waste service providers to provide waste collection and disposal services. There is no concern about accessing the UMC - Banner property to provide waste removal services. On-site waste storage facilities are depicted on Figure CS502 titled "Site Details". Three waste compactors are shown on the south side of a loading dock located to the north of Adams Street in the southwest portion of the UMC - Banner Planned Area Development. Adequate access for vehicles to service the compactors is provided on this plan. Based on this review, ES requires the following: •Provide waste stream calculations for the three compactors in accordance with TSM 8-01.4.0.B. •Specify the anticipated method of collection and frequency for the three compactors in accordance with TSM 8-01.4.0.B. •Identify which compactors are to be used for refuse and which are to be used for recycling materials. •If none of the three compactors are to be used for recycling, identify what type of container(s) and the location(s) of the containers which are proposed for recycling materials. •The compactor sites must be screened from public view in accordance with TSM 8-01.4.0.C. Describe the proposed enclosure around the compactors to screen them from public view. •Gates shall be provided on the compactor enclosures to screen them from public view in accordance with TSM 8-01.4.0.C. and TSM 8-01.5.1.B. •The compactor spaces shall be dimensioned to comply with TSM 8-01.5.2.J. The additional information specified above must be submitted in order to complete the review of the UMC - Banner Development Package from a solid waste standpoint. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P. E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 03/09/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | March 9, 2016 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP16-0027 PROJECT NAME: UMC - Banner PROJECT ADDRESS: 1501 N Campbell Ave PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Traffic Engineering recommends approval of the PAD Development plan. 1. TDOT concurs with the traffic impact analysis and the recommended transportation/traffic improvements set forth by the analysis. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/10/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Banner Medical Center - Tucson - Expansion & Renovation Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 11, 2016 DUE DATE: March 11, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 10, 2016. 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0027, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - Revise General Note 1 to include "PROPOSED ZONING PAD-28".2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 3. All structures proposed to be demolished will require separate permits. Any structure 50 years or older and/or listed on National Historic Register will require historic review prior to issuance of a demo permit. 4. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Provide width dimensions for all access lanes and parking area access lanes on the plan. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Sheet CS103 there appears to be a one-way access lane near the northeast corner of the parking shown in the southwest corner of the sheet. Provide a width dimension and indicate how the one-way will be controlled, i.e. signage, pavement markings, etc. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - Dimension all back-up spurs shown on the plan, see UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4. 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 1 Sheet CS501 & detail 1 & 2 Sheet CS504 the location dimension for the wheel stop is not correct, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 1 Sheet CS504 it appears that the proposed accessible signs will encroach into the required 2'-6" vehicle overhang. 8. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Detail 1 Sheet CS504 provide a mounting height dimensions for the proposed accessible sign. Minimum height is 7'-0". 9. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - As PAD-28 is silent on compact vehicle parking spaces and the UDC does not allow compact vehicle parking spaces the propose compact vehicle parking spaces are not allowed. 10. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Sheet CS106 along the west side of the sheet keynote 92 calls out for a sign that encroaches into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang. 11. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Some type of barrier is required at the following areas; a. Sheet CS102 center vehicle parking area; provide a barrier to prevent damage to the proposed well enclosure called out under keynote 16. b. Sheet CS105 along the west side of the vehicle parking area, provide a barrier to prevent damage to the proposed railing called out under keynote 38 or show that the railing is setback from the vehicle parking space at least 2'-6". 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 12. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Detail 2 sheet CS501 shows a distance of 8'-3" between bicycle racks. If this dimension is correct than the short term bicycle parking called out under keynote 27 on sheet CS106 will not fit as shown. Per UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f and Figure 7.4.9-C the distance should be 4'-0". 13. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Review UDC Articles 7.4.9.B and Figure 7.4.9-C and ensure that all applicable dimensions are provided on Detail 2 sheet CS501. 14. 2-06.4.9.R - Provide width dimensions for all propose sidewalks on the plan. 15. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet CS105 south of the accessible vehicle parking spaces demonstrate on the plan that the minimum sidewalk width is maintained between the accessible sign and the edge of sidewalk. 16. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet CS106 along the east side of the drop-off area there is a sidewalk adjacent to vehicle parking. This sidewalk either needs to be 6'-6" wide or wheel stops are required for the vehicle parking spaces. 17. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet CS106 near the southeast corner of the vehicle parking area there is a crosswalk called out under keynote 95 that leads to vehicle parking space. Remove the crosswalk from this area. 18. 2-06.4.9.R - Sheet LS106 show bollards along the drop-off areas shown north of the buildings where pavement is flush with the sidewalk. Provide the spacing for these bollards If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/10/2016 | ARUIZ1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this review. Kara Curtis Community Service Officer Tucson Police Department Operations Division Midtown 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 kara.curtis@tucsonaz.gov (520) 837-7428 |
| 03/10/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/10/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/11/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/14/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/15/2016 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Per the PAD conditions any proposed demolition of contributing structures in the Jefferson Park National Register Historic District will be required to provide Architectural Documentation. Further, any expansion of the campus that may trigger an Archaeological Survey should be reviewed by the City Historic Preservation Officer. The demolition application outlining the requirements for Architectural Documentation may be obtained here: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/HIST_DEMO_rev.pdf Please contact Jonathan Mabry at 837-6968 for further information regarding the requirements and review of Architectural Documentation for this project. |
| 03/15/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by reveiw staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 03/15/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See information in PRO/SIRE No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2016 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |