Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP16-0026
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/12/2016 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/12/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 02/17/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 02/17/2016 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | The proposed Development will have no impact on any ADOT facilities because of its location and Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 02/19/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | Comments are in SIRE/PRO |
| 02/19/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See letter and information in PRO/SIRE |
| 02/24/2016 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | TEP Facilities Map is in SIRE/PRO 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#6103991 January 24, 2016 NELSON PARTNERS ATTN: RANDY MCMANUS 15210 N SCOTTSDALE RD, STE 300 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85254 Dear Randy Mcmanus: SUBJECT: MAIN GATE DP16-0026 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 13, 2015. It appears there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. TEP has coordinated the relocation of the existing equipment with the developer. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918- 8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Rich Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Josh Necas at (520) 917-8759. Sincerely, Mike Norris Scheduling Coordinator Design |
| 02/29/2016 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | No comments at this point, will review when PIA is submitted. |
| 03/04/2016 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 03/07/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Main Gate Phase V Hotel Development Package (1st Review) DP16-0026 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 10, 2016 DUE DATE: March 11, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The UDC, AM & TSM can be viewed at www.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd. This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is February 10, 2017. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP16-0026, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the Main Gate Overlay case number, T16SA00086, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3. 2-06.4.3 - All relevant case numbers shown on the civil sheets need to be shown adjacent to the title block on each landscape sheet. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a general note list the Main Gate case number, date of approval, what was approved, and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 5. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - The proposed 16.5' access lane, "TYNDALL AVE (PRIVATE)" does not meet the minimum width requirements of UDC Table 7.4.6-2, two-way access lane of 20'-0". 6. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - The are several access lane, ramps and PAALS shown on sheet 6 parking garage plans that do not have width dimensions. Provide width dimension for all access lane, ramps and PAALS see redline. 7. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Per IBC Section 1106.1 accessible vehicle parking spaces are required based on the total number of provided vehicle parking spaces. Provide an accessible vehicle parking space calculation and shown the required spaces on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.1.e are met. 2-06.4.9.R - Demonstrate on the plan how vehicles will be prevented from access the sidewalk areas on the east and west end for the area that is protected by bollards along the north side of the structure. The provided Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property references the "LUC" not the applicable UDC. See https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/pdsd/forms/Covenant_Regarding_Development_and_Use_of_Real_Property_UDC.pdf for the applicable covenant. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/07/2016 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please include the MGD DRC approved Design Package with the Buillding Plans. FD |
| 03/08/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/09/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Revise the plans to clarify compliance with the Main Gate District Standards and Guidelines: A. 4' clear or planter area from back of curb to the sidewalk. C-4.b.4 B. Street trees. C-9.c C. Trash and recycling receptacle at each street corner. C-12.b D. Water harvesting. C-13.d E. Irrigation smart control. C-13.f F. Curb side planters, depressions and curb openings. C-13.h G. Use of pavers and natural stone for 2nd Street and Tyndall Ave. C-15.c H. Use of pervious or permeable pavers for 2nd Street and Tyndall Ave . C-15.d I. Identify the Environmentally Conscious Design Practices. C-16 |
| 03/09/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov >>> DSD_CDRC 2/12/2016 11:27 AM >>> THIS PROJECT IS IN THE MAINGATE OVERLAY. COPY OF OVERLAY AND REZONING CONDITIONS ARE IN THE PACKAGE Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP16-0026 |
| 03/10/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See Zoning comments |
| 03/11/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/14/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | ARUIZ1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our initial review of the Development Package Application materials for the proposed Main Gate Phase V Hotel. The address of the proposed development is 930 E. 2nd Street in Tucson. The existing use of the proposed hotel site is surface parking. Refuse from the adjacent Marriott building and several other surrounding buildings is currently placed into a 40 cubic yard solid waste compactor located on the west side of Tyndall Avenue in proximity to the proposed hotel site. The Main Gate Hotel will also use this compactor for the disposal of their refuse. Recycling materials from the Marriott building and surrounding buildings was stored in two 8 cubic yard containers located on the proposed hotel site. These containers will be removed and one 30 cubic yard recycling container will be located adjacent to the compactor. The Main Gate Hotel will also use this container for placement of their recycling materials. Refuse volume records for the compactor and for the recycling containers were obtained by Greg Carlson Engineering LLC for the year 2015. These records show that 120 compacted cubic yards of refuse and 12 compacted cubic yards of recycling materials were generated each week during 2015. The waste generation rate calculation for the proposed hotel building correctly used the rate of 0.0057 tons per square foot of floor space per year. This calculation shows that 18 compacted cubic yards of refuse and recycling materials will be generated from the proposed hotel development. Assuming all the waste is handled by the compactor, the total volume of waste for the compactor is 150 compacted cubic yards per week. This will require service four days per week. Service vehicles will continue to access the compactor / recycling container site from Tyndall Avenue from the north from 2nd Street. There are no issues with refuse vehicle access to the compactor / recycling container locations. Based on our review of the waste generation rates for the proposed hotel building, container servicing frequency and review of the compactor and recycling container locations, ES approves the Development Package Application materials from a solid waste standpoint. Please let me know if there are any questions concerning this review. Thomas G. Ryan, P.E. City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
| 03/14/2016 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Reqs Change | February 26, 2016 To: James McMurtrie Greg Carlson Engineering, LLC ____________________________________ From: Erica Sanchez, CEA, PCRWRD (520) 724-6934 Subject: Main Gate Phase V Hotel P16WS00011 PSL– 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department has found the following deficiencies in the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS) 2012. Per Type II Capacity Response Letter #2016-28 capacity is not currently available. Connecting to the public sewer as shown on plan will require you to construct a relief sewer south along Euclid to connect with the 15” sewer in 5th ST. Otherwise connection for the hotel should be south to the 8” public line G-012 in University Blvd. This office will require a revised set of plans, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. All comments cited in this letter are based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards 2012 and PCRWRD Standard Specifications and Details for Construction 2012. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per Sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50.00 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next plan submittal will require a review fee of $50.00 made payable to Pima County Treasurer. If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | No issues. Lighting was included in the parking structure. Thanks, Kara |
| 03/14/2016 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/14/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/15/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted. 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 03/15/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See letter and other documents in PRO/SIRE No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG40MPOhoriz3.png 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/24/2016 | RBENT1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 03/24/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 03/24/2016 | RBENT1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |