Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP16-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2016 | KROBLES1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/18/2016 | AHINES2 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Approv-Cond | May 16, 2016 Dear Ms. Hines, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on DP16-0008 Development Package, Mordasini Villas; a development plan review application for an approximately 1.92 acre site located on the northwest corner of South Stone Avenue and East 17th Street. The proposed land use is residential. This site is within the Tucson International Airport public disclosure area, traffic pattern airspace, and FAA Part 77 airspace. This site is within the City of Tucson Airport Environs Zones. The applicant shall file Form 7460 with the FAA. Please file Form 7460 at https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/portal.jsp. The Tucson Airport Authority conditionally approves the subject request contingent upon the following condition of approval, as noted below. This condition should be identified in the general notes of the approved development plan. Condition of approval: "That prior to the City's approval of any construction permit for a permanent building, the property owner shall record the Airport Disclosure Statement form that discloses the existence, and operational characteristics of the Tucson International Airport to future owners or tenants of the property and further conveys the right to the public to lawfully use the airspace above the property. The content of such documents shall be according to the form and instructions provided." "That development shall not cause or potentially affect aviation in the vicinity of the site, including but not limited to, physical obstructions to aircraft operations, interference with operations by way of electrical static, visual obstructions through emissions or glare, and/or the open storage of petroleum products, explosive materials, or materials which attract or lead to the concentration of wildlife." The intent is to have the Airport Disclosure Statement form recorded for the properties within the final plat boundaries. The property owner shall forward a copy of the recorded Airport Disclosure Statement form to: Scott Robidoux Airport Planner Tucson Airport Authority 7250 South Tucson Boulevard Suite 300 Tucson, AZ 85756 Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns regarding this comment letter. I can be reached by email at srobidoux@flytucson.com or by telephone at 520-573-4811. Respectfully, Scott Robidoux, Airport Planner cc MS file |
| 06/01/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Mardasini Villas Lots 1-11 Development Package (2nd Review) DP16-0008 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 2, 2016 DUE DATE: June 13, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is January 13, 2017. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 1. COMMENT: There is an "EXISTING 25' INGRESS, EGRESS & UTILTIY EASEMENT, DKT 13421, PG 1428" shown along the west side of the proposed development. As improvements, retaining walls, are proposed within the existing easement, abandonment of the easement or written permission from easement holder(s) is required prior to approval of this plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 2. This comment was not addressed. Typical details are applicable for lots 4 - 6 and 7 - 10. Interior perimeter yard setbacks for all lots are based on UDC Article 8.7.3.L.1. It does not appear that the proposed perimeter yard setbacks are met on lots 4 - 6 along the west site boundary, see UDC Article 8.7.3.K.1. Per UDC Tables 6.3-3.A Res Use to Nonres Zone the required perimeter yard is 10' or ¾ the height the exterior wall, whichever is greatest. It is not clear that the requirements of UDC Article 8.7.3.K.2 are met for lots 7 - 10. COMMENT: Provide a typical perimeter yard setback detail for lots 4 - 10 on the plan. Once the above comments are addressed Zoning will provide an over-the-counter review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & proposed CC&Rs. |
| 06/02/2016 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/08/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | DP16-0008 / Tentative Plat - FLD Mordasini Villas / 2nd submittal is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 |
| 06/10/2016 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 240 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: City of Tucson City Development Review Committee Planning and Development Services FROM: Suzanne Gilpin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office (520)724-4387 DATE: June 9, 2016 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat- DP16-0008 Mordasini Villas * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. __ ___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 06/14/2016 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/14/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/14/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/14/2016 | AHINES2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff a) SEE ZONING REVIEW COMMENTS - over the counter review b) SEE TIA REVIEW COMMENTS to add general notes - review by Alexandra Hines or Patricia Gehlen 3) All items needed to approve these plans |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2016 | RBENT1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |