Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0203
Parcel: 11103064A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0203
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
12/03/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/10/2015 MSTPAUL1 ADA REVIEW Approved
12/10/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP15-0203
3518 North Country Club
Retail

TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 10, 2015

DUE DATE: December 17, 2015

1) COMMENT: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS


2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines.

2) COMMENT: Provide the email address for all.

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

3) COMMENT: Provide the development package number (DP15-0203) near the title block.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes


2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation


2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

4) COMMENT: Provide a fully dimensioned plan view detail for the short-term bicycle parking (See 7.4.9.B.1 & .2). Clearly demonstrate at least four (4) feet of clearance is provided for pedestrian access (UDC Section 7.4.9.B.1.a) and provide a minimum six (6) feet of parking for each bicycle (UDC Section 7.4.9.B.2.c: See Figure 7.4.9-C.). Provide similar information (location, dimensioned details) for the long-term bicycle parking. Look at the criteria for long-term bicycle parking at UDC Section 7.4.9.D. The long-term bicycle parking can be placed within the building, with the above information.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

5) COMMENT: Continuous pedestrian circulation paths are required throughout the development (TS 7-01.3.3) and must be connected to all public access areas of the development project ant to all adjacent streets (TS 7-01.3.3.A & .B). Provide a sidewalk to Greenlee Road (TS 7-01.4.1.A). A sidewalk is required between the building and driveway along the east side of the building (TS 7-01.4.1.B; 4.2.A; .4.3.A & .B). [Note: The minimum two-way driveway is twenty (20) feet. The driveway provided is twenty-four (24) feet wide, which is the minimum for a two-way PAAL. See UDC Table 7.4.6-2 for a two-way access lane.]

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

6) COMMENT: A separate process and permits are required for all signs.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

7) COMMENT: See landscape review comments by Andrew Conner or Joe Linville.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

Provide two copies of the revised development package plans, one copy of the previously submitted plans and one copy of building elevations and floor plans.
12/14/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. An approved development plan is not to be used for construction or modification of on-site utilities (e.g. water service to buildings, building sewers, site lighting, electrical service to buildings, etc.). The construction of the on-site utilities may be included with the permit for constructing the building.
2. Revise the site plan to show the location of the reduced pressure backflow assembly. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
3. Provide a cleanout for the building sewer prior to entering the right-of-way. Reference: Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Standard Detail RWRD 401.
4. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2389.22') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2389.25'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
12/15/2015 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Show existing and future sight visibilities for both driveways and the adjacent street intersection.
2. Clearly show that roof drainage will not be directed onto a sidewalk or pedestrian route.
3. General grading and paving notes 11, 12 and 21 are not required by code or standard. If you choose to retain the notes, final reports and as-builts will be required at completion of the project.
12/17/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/17/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS


Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way improvements and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/22/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed