Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0199
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/12/2016 | RBENT1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/19/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July 20, 2016 DUE DATE: August 8, 2016 SUBJECT: Site - A - Family Self Storage TO: Jeff Stanley, PE LOCATION: 8325 E Golf Links REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0199 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the 2nd submittal of the proposed Development Plan Package. Based on the comment responses it appears actions required by comments 1, 2 and 4 from the first submittal commnet letter have not yet been completed. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per rezone condition number 3 and previous comment number 1 please provide evidence of payment to Pima County Flood Control District in the amount of fifty percent of the cost of the bank protection along the subject property frontages of the Pantano and Atterbury Washes. - Per September 9, 2016 email from Eric Shepp at the Pima County Flood Control District The County does not show any outstanding fees owed to the County. 2) Per AM 2-06.4.9K and previous comment number 2 please provide recording information for the 30' wide area dedicated for potential linear park per keynote 14. It was not clear what the comment response meant. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.9N5 and previous comment number 4 please show permission from property owner for tie-ins to Atterbury and Pantano Washes. This may be a floodplain use permit issued by Pima County Flood Control District. Approval of the plan will occur after the permit is acquired. This permit acquisition should also resolve the 1st comment. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 07/19/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Great. Thanks again for your review and consideration of our interests. E From: Paul Baughman [Paul.Baughman@tucsonaz.gov] Sent: Monday, September 12, 2016 9:38 AM To: Eric Shepp Subject: Re: Russ Shaw You have provided all of the documentation I need with the below email. Thanks. Paul Baughman, PE, CFM Civil Engineer Planning and Development Services 201 N. Stone Tucson, AZ 85726 520-837-5007 >>> Eric Shepp <Eric.Shepp@pima.gov> 09/12/2016 9:32 AM >>> Hi Paul, I met with Russ Shaw on Friday who represents the owner of A Family Self Storage..(your DP15-0199). He is trying to follow up a comment by COT regarding the payment of 50% of the costs of the adjacent bank protection, built over 20 years ago. Our records regarding this are scant, and the all the evidence found to date suggests that this issue was satisfied. This includes a 1994 letter from Albert Elias saying all rezoning conditions were satisfied. (50% contribution being a rezoning condition) Do you have information to suggest otherwise? Regardless, although the District appreciates your diligence in this regard, we have not been pursuing this issue and do not consider this an outstanding issue. What would you need from us to satisfy this comment? E |
| 07/20/2016 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | Applicant must take the plans that are to be approved to Addressing for verification of the building numbers before submitting to PDSD. Written approval must be provided from Addressing. DP15-0199 A-Family Self-Storage/ 2nd Submittal, as shown in the attached pdf (Building Numbers 14 – 29), is Approved by Pima County Addressing. Thank you, Robin Freiman Addressing Specialist Pima County Development Services Department 201 N Stone AV – 1st Floor Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 724-7570 Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE70DF.60625CC0 Click here to search for Projects and Permits or to make a Payment Click here to search for Septic Records |
| 07/21/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional SWG documents in PRO. July 21, 2016 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for A-Family Self Storage - Expansion CDRC No. DP15-0199 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 4" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Golf Links Rd. and may be impacted by pavement saw cutting along the northern edge of Golf Links Rd. and driveway grading into development. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6049 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Shawn Stoner Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) |
| 07/26/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields, Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: Expansion of A-Family Self-Storage - 8325 E. Golf Links Road Development Package (2nd Review) DP15-0199 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 26, 2016 DUE DATE: August 8, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. Follow Up to Previous Comment 5: Due to changes in the use of buildings 1-4 to Retail Use, the number of bicycle facilities shall be based on the total square footage of the retail buildings. The overall retail square footage equals 17,400 sq ft, short and long term facilities are required as well as compliance with the location and distance for both types of facilities. Review UDC sections 7.4.9.B.C.and .D for specifics to each type and possible exceptions if applicable. The bicycle parking facilities needed to comply with the location and distance may be more than is required. (See exceptions as well) Revise the bicycle parking facilities appropriately once it is determined the number of facilities required. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. PREVIOUS COMMENT 5: Demonstrate on the plan that the existing short-term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B & C. 2. Follow Up to Previous Comment 6: Clearly delineate the phase line from the west property line to the east property line. The proposed phase line appears to be in between the buildings. This does not provide for traffic circulation. It is suggested that the phase line be placed beyond the break between the buildings and enough to provide vehicular access around the buildings. The post and cable barrier must be clearly depicted and labeled on the plan. The post and cable barrier is not visible anywhere in the phase line area. Perhaps a detail drawing specifically detailing the barrier needs to be provided. 2-06.4.9.H.6 - If the project is phased, the phase under consideration shall be designed so those later phases are assured legal access. If such access is provided through the phase under consideration, public streets are required, or access easements must be delineated and dedicated for such use. If private easements are utilized, protective covenants establishing the right of access, maintenance and incorporation of future phases into this project are required. PREVIOUS COMMENT 6: As you are proposing a phased project demonstrate how vehicles will be prevented from accessing the area north of phase I. 3. Follow Up to Previous Comment 9: On the cover sheet, revise the building square footage for buildings 6 and 11 to match the square footage labeled in the building footprints or visa versa, which ever is correct. Also, the Manager's residence square footage is bracketed with the retail building areas. The residence square footage should be listed separately. Revise the calculations as required based on the corrected building square footages. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). PREVIOUS COMMENT 9: Provide the height of the proposed buildings within the footprint on the plan. 4. Follow Up to Previous Comment 10: Contact with Jim Rossi of the Real Estate Division 791-4181 shall be made to start the dedication process requirements. It is also advised that contact be made with TDOT as the dedication requirement is for a WASH. (I am not 100% sure if the Real Estate Division will contact TDOT as part of the process.) 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. PREVIOUS COMMENT 10: Rezoning condition 28 calls for a dedication of 30' of right-of-way along the Atterbury wash. This right-of-way must be dedicated not just called out on the plan. Your plan shows improvements within the dedication area. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/27/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 08/03/2016 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. (General comment, pertaining to plan contents) UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following comment was not fully addressed: Rezoning condition # 28 on Sheet 2 of 13 indicates a dedication of 30' of right-of-way along the Atterbury Wash. The right-of-way must be dedicated in a survivable manner with docket and page. The site plan shows improvements within the dedication area. The following comments were not addressed: TECHNICAL STANDARDS MANUAL WASH Watercourses The regulated area for WASH watercourses includes channel and banks of a watercourse and the area within 50 feet of the top of the bank, or where there is no defined bank, 50 feet from the ten-year flood boundary. WASH watercourses include: SECTION 4: HYDROLOGY Encroachment in Regulated Areas This project proposes encroachment within the regulated areas, it shall conform to the following. 1. Environmental Resource Report. Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC. The supporting material for preparation of the Environmental Resource Report is based on information from the Hydrologic Data and Wash Information maps on the Tucson Department of Transportation internet web site: The Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitat Map and Report, the Mayor and Council Interim Watercourse Improvement Policy and subsequent adopted policies, the Tucson Storm-water Management Study, the following Basin Management Plans: 1) West Branch, Santa Cruz; 2) Houghton East; 3) Este Wash; and 4) Arroyo Chico. the Tucson Storm-water Management Study, Phase II and field observation. An application may request that an element listed below be waived or that the report address only a specified area where a full report is not applicable to the proposed encroachment. DSD may grant such waivers where the elements or full report are not required by code. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 08/03/2016 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | 1) The 30' of right-of-way on the west boundary of the property which is to be dedicated to the City of Tucson for the construction of the Atturbury Wash Greenway cannot be used to satisfy the project's landscape or water harvesting requirements. Remove these elements from this area of the plans. 2) The response letter indicates that the scupper drain and irrigation sleeves requested in my previous comments had been included. I cannot find these on the revised plans. 3) The response letter also indicates that there is further information regarding Parks and Recreation's previous comments on a landscaping response letter which is supposed to be attached. I cannot locate this letter in the materials submitted for review. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/05/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | Hi Trish, We have not received a submittal for this project. Respectfully, Tom Thomas W.Porter, P.E. Civil Engineer Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Dept Development Liaison Unit 201 N. Stone Ave., 1st Floor, Tucson, AZ 85701-1207 ph: (520) 724-6719 |
| 08/05/2016 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans. |
| 08/05/2016 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | August 9, 2016 To: Jeffrey A. Stanley JAS Engineering. ____________________________________ From: Hussein Al Zubaidi, PCRWRD (520) 724-6404 Subject: EXPANSION OF A-FAMILY SELF STORAGE. P16WS00063(DP15-0199) PSL- 1st Submittal The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer design for the above-referenced project. The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the Preliminary Sewer Layout (PSL), based upon PCRWRD Engineering Design Standards (EDS). If you have any questions regarding this matter please contact me at your convenience. Cc. Lorenzo Hernandez, P.E., RWRD Thomas Porter, P.E., RWRD Francisco Galindo, P.E., RWRD |
| 08/05/2016 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | Trish, The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of Project Number DP16-0199 A-Family Self-Storage / 2nd Submittal. In the first review of this package, the following modifications were requested: •Revise the recycling enclosure detail and notes, •Add the turning radius for the recycling enclosure. •Show the existing refuse enclosure meets the current standards. The review of the second submittal shows that the above requested modifications have been satisfactorily made. Therefore, ES approves the second submittal of the Development Package for the A-Family Self-Storage facility from a solid waste standpoint. Please contact me if there are any questions concerning this review. Tom Ryan City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08/2016 | RBENT2 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |