Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP15-0198
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2017 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/17/2017 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE 4.1 Identification and Descriptive Data A. All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. This project was processed through an IID application review and approval. Contact Carolyn Laurie to verify if the revised DP must go back for an IID review and re-approval. Ensure that Zoning comments are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/17/2017 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The rim elevation of the next upstream public sanitary cleanout (2384.48) is more than 12" below the first floor elevation (2386.6'). The installation of a backwater valve is not allowed for building drains serving fixtures located on floors more than 12" above the next upstream manhole or cleanout. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/23/2017 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Approved | I have no comments on this project. >>> DSD_CDRC 12/21/2016 9:56 AM >>> This is an electronic distribution for the 4th review of a CDRC Development Package. The paper copies of the review documents are available in the plans room. The applicable case number is: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0198 Address: 235 South Church Ave Proposed Use: MultiFamily Dwelling Due Date: January 19, 2016 Electronic Documents are attached to this email. |
| 01/24/2017 | KLEE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All approved documents submitted previously 3) A disk containing all items submitted 4) All items requested by review staff 5) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 12/19/2016 | ARUIZ1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 12/21/2016 | CLAURIE1 | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide additional information assoicated with new wall alignment and site access. |
| 12/28/2016 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera for Steve Shields - Principal Planner PDSD Zoning Review Section PROJECT: DP for the Marist On Cathedral Square - Marist College Development Package (1st Review) Revision Set DP15-0198 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2016 DUE DATE: January 19, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. The following comments are related to the proposed revisions and changes to the DP plan sheets. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 1. COMMENT: The sheet index on the cover sheet or the sheet names in the title block for sheets 4 and 5 must be revised. The sheet index lists sheet 4 as the "Utilities and Easement Plan" and sheet 5 as the "Grading and Hydrology Plan". Sheet 4 and sheet 5 are actually reversed in the plan set and the "Grading and Drainage plan should be renamed to match the index or visa versa. Revise as required. 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 2. COMMENT: Clarify why there is such a difference in the building square footage? If the building is being expanded draw and label the building expansion and include the square footage and height of the new expansion. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 3. COMMENT: On sheet 5 "Utilities and Easement Plan", two (2) new easements are proposed. One is a Pedestrian access easement and a new electric easement along the west boundary south of the driveway. Both easements must be recorded and the recordation information must be listed on the DP plan sheet prior to final approval of the DP. 4. COMMENT: This project was processed through an IID application review and approval. Contact Carolyn Laurie to verify if the revised DP must go back for an IID review and re-approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/10/2017 | PIBARRA1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |