Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0192
Parcel: 10602243F

Address:
3760 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0192
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/10/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Section 903.2.9.2 of the 2012 International Fire Code indicates a fire sprinkler requirement for an area of tire storage in excess of 20,000 cubic feet. Provide calculations showing tire storage area is under this cubic foot limitation, or show on plan proposed location of fire sprinkler underground.
11/16/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Discount Tires - 3760 N. Oracle Road - Building Expansion
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0192

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2015

DUE DATE: December 02, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is November 01, 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet, this includes the landscape sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: The index of sheets should include the landscape sheets.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

3. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

4. COMMENT: The total number of pages should include the landscape sheets.

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

5. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0192, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

6. COMMENT: Show the subject property centered within the location map.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

7. COMMENT: Label the section corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

8. COMMENT: The "EX/PROPSOED USE:" is not correct. Per UDC Table 4.8-4 PERMITTED USES - COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES, the existing and proposed use should be Automotive: Major Service and Repair (excluding bodywork and paint-booths), subject to Use Specific Standard 4.9.13.E.

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

9. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

10. COMMENT: There are what appear to be two (2) sheds shown along the east side of the existing building, shown on the development package and the 2014 aerial photos, that the square footage has not been accounted for, clarify.

11. COMMENT: Based on aerial photos it appears that the area along the north side of the existing building, inside the striped area is used for tire changing. If this is the case this area needs to be delineated on the plan and included in all applicable calculations, i.e. expansion, vehicle parking, etc.

12. COMMENT: Based on aerial photos it appears that the area along the east side of the existing building, inside the fenced area is used for storage. If this is the case this area needs to be delineated on the plan and included in all applicable calculations, i.e. expansion, vehicle parking, etc.

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

13. COMMENT: Remove all references to "LOT COVERAGE" from the plan as it is not applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

14. COMMENT: Until comment 10 has been addressed the percentage of building expansion cannot be verified.

15. COMMENT: Based on the last approved plan provide a vehicle use area expansion calculation on the plan.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

16. COMMENT: Show the future SVT's on the plan based on future curb locations.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

As the parking area shown on this plan does not match the provided last approved plan the following comments apply:

17. COMMENT: As the parking area shown on this plan does not match the provided last approved plan provide PAAL/access lane width dimensions for all Pals and access lanes shown on the plan.

18. COMMENT: It does not appear that the PAAL shown south of the existing billboard will meet the required 24' width once the required five (5) foot setback is shown, see UDC Article 4.9.4.G.2.

19. COMMENT: Provide a PAAL width dimension from the north end of the ramp shown just north of the main entrance to the vehicle parking spaces to the north. This ramp may not encroach into the PAAL.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

As the parking area shown on this plan does not match the provided last approved plan the following comments apply:

20. COMMENT: Until comments 10, 11 & 12 are addressed the required number of vehicle parking spaces cannot be verified.

21. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 10-.1.5.1.A Lines of Sight. Lines of sight will not be obscured between 30 inches and six feet through a triangular area adjacent to a driveway, a PAAL, an alley, or a street, where such access ways intersect with another street in a T-configuration. The sight visibility triangle, or sight triangle, consists of three sides that are formed by two intersecting access ways and a line connecting the two. That said the three (3) vehicle parking spaces shown along the north property line obscure the SVT and may not be counted toward required parking.

22. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said the three (3) vehicle parking spaces shown along the north property line may not overhang the property line as shown on the plan.

23. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both a standard parking space and those for the physically disabled. This detail should address the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

24. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that the vehicle parking ratio used in the vehicle parking space calculation is correct but the reference to "RETAIL" is not. The proposed use is Automotive: Major Service and Repair and the vehicle parking space calculation should reference the correct use.

25. COMMENT: The proposed accessible signage appears to encroach into the 2'-6" vehicle overhang, see UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

26. COMMENT: Sheet 4 at the accessible vehicle parking spaces there is a 2'-0" dimension show for the location of the proposed wheel stop. This dimension does not meet the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.H.3.

27. COMMENT: Sheet 4, Grading and Drainage Note 10 references "MAG STD DET 150", provide this detail on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4.

As the parking area shown on this plan does not match the provided last approved plan the following comments apply:

28. COMMENT: Revise the loading space calculation to reflect the requirements of UDC TABLE 7.5.5-A: REQUIRED LOADING AREAS, Commercial Services Use Group, Billboard, 1 Type A required.

29. COMMENT: Show the required Type A loading space for the billboard on the plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

30. COMMENT: Until comments 10, 11 & 12 are addressed the required number of long term parking spaces cannot be verified.

31. COMMENT: Remove all references to "CLASS 1 & 2" bicycle parking from the plan as it is no longer applicable. Bicycle parking should be referenced as Short & Long Term.

32. COMMENT: Based on the "CLASS II" bicycle parking detail shown on sheet 5 the provided number of short term bicycle should be 4, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.d. This detail should match the proposed short term bicycle parking shown on the plan.

33. COMMENT: Show the 2' x 6' bicycle parking space on the plan, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.f & UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

34. COMMENT: Show the 2'-6" required distance from the proposed short term rack to the long term locker, see UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.g & UDC Figure 7.4.9-C.

35. COMMENT: As the proposed short and long term bicycle parking is located within the future right-of-way (ROW) provide a future ROW plan that demonstrates how the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9 are met if the ROW is taken.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

36. COMMENT: Show the future curb and sidewalk for Oracle Road on the plan.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

37. COMMENT: Per a Zoning Administrators determination any property that boarders on a street designated on the MS&R map will use developing area street perimeter yard setbacks. If a property boarders on two (2) or more streets, one of which is designated on the MS&R map, all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1. That said the street perimeter yard setbacks listed sheet 3 and shown on the plan are not correct. Street perimeter yard setback for Oracle Road is based on UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1, ADT of 1,000 or greater - 21 feet measured from the back of future curb location. Street perimeter yard setback for Pastime Road, ADT over 140 but less than 1,000 - 21 feet measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

38. COMMENT: Provide the building height for the existing building within the footprint on the plan.

39. COMMENT: There are what appear to be two (2) sheds shown along the east side of the existing building, shown on the development package and the 2014 aerial photos, provide the square footage and height within the footprint on the plan.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

40. COMMENT: Along the north side of the existing building there is an area were the sidewalk narrows from 5' to ?, provide a sidewalk width dimension at its narrowest point.

41. COMMENT: Near the northwest corner of the existing building there is an "EX. SITE SIGN" that appears to encroach into the proposed 5' sidewalk. Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A are met.

42. COMMENT: Demonstrate on the plan that the requirements of Per TSM Section 7-01.4.3.A are met to the north of the short term bicycle parking.

43. COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-.1.4.1.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainage way or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. Provide the required sidewalk to Pastime Road on the plan.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

44. COMMENT: Clearly show the existing billboard on the plan. This includes all structural elements extending from the billboard, including, but not limited to, overhangs, cantilevered beams, and elevated walkways. Clearly show the required five (5) foot setback required per UDC Articles 4.9.4.G.1 & 2.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/18/2015 SSHIELD1 ADA REVIEW Passed
11/18/2015 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Discount Tires - 3760 N. Oracle Road - Building Expansion
Accessibility Review - On Site Only
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0192

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 18, 2015

DUE DATE: December 02, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. Provide a note stating that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes.

2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route.

3. The provided accessible sign detail needs to include a van accessible sign.

4. Per the 2012 IBC Section 1106.5 Van Spaces, For every six or fraction of six accessible parking spaces, at least one shall be a van-accessible parking space. That said provide a van accessible vehicle parking space on the plan.

5. Sheet 4 there is a ramp called out under Grading and Drainage Note 7, located along the west side of the existing building, This ramp should be built per ICC A117.1, Section 405. Truncated domes are not required.
11/27/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following information:
a. The location of sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
b. The points of connection to existing public sewers.
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012.
11/30/2015 LOREN MAKUS ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change 1. Explain the proposed use for the existing driveway which leads to the area of the proposed addition. No vehicle access is shown into the addition at this location. Since this appears to result in an unneeded curb cut, the curb cut will need to be replaced by vertical curb. (Tucson Code 25-43)
2. Note the as-built certification is not required by PDSD and may be removed from the plans. If the certification block remains on the plans, it will be required.
3. The flood hazard Zone X description should be revised to reflect the definition of unshaded X-zones.
4. Provide a detail of the enclosure for the solid waste enclosure to demonstrate it meets the requirement of Technical Standard 8.
12/01/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/01/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Maintenance Schedule

Pruning schedules to show that plant material will maintain pedestrian and vehicular clearances or that the material will establish opaque hedge screens, if required;
Replacement criteria, should plant material not survive;

Replacement or upkeep maintenance schedules for inert ground cover materials;

Upkeep maintenance schedules for exterior hardscape materials; and,

Maintenance and replacement schedules for irrigation systems.

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

7.6.2. APPLICABILITY

The provisions of this section apply to the following:
A. All new development; and,

Buildings 10,000 Square Feet or Less
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is 10,000 square feet or less, expansions in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows.

If the expansion is less than 50%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.

Verify accumulative expansion calculation.

Street Landscape Borders
Located on Site
Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site. Oracle Road is considered a state route any landscape improvements must be approved by ADOT.

Use of the Public Right-of-Way
Non-required landscaping may be placed in the public right-of-way, if the following standards are met:

1. The landscaping is approved by the City Engineer or designee and complies with the City Engineer's standards on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type;

2. All vegetation complies with the standards of Section 7.6.4, Landscaping Standards; and,

3. The landscaping does not interfere with the use of the sidewalk. Obtain permission for use of ROW.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/17/2016 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed