Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0178
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please provide stamp for approvals. Please change note 13 on sheet AS1 to refer to the 2012 International Fire Code |
| 11/13/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/13/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/16/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 11/19/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0178 5444 East Fort Lowell Road Parking lot for City of Tucson Park TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 19, 2015 DUE DATE: November 19, 2015 1) COMMENT: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). 2) COMMENT: This site is in the HR-1 Zone. Historic review is required (UDC Sections 3.3.7 and 5.8.5). (This project is scheduled for historic review.) See ADA comments. |
| 11/19/2015 | MSTPAUL1 | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St. Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: Accessibility Review - On Site Only (HR-1 Zone) Development Package (1st Review) 5444 East Fort Lowell Road ADA review for City of Tucson Park TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 19, 2015 DUE DATE: November 19, 2015 1) COMMENT: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Administrative Manual 2-06, Technical Standards Manual 7-01 and ADA comments and standards were addressed (2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design; Department of Justice, September 15, 2010). Provide an accessible route from the accessible parking space to the accessible route at the building and to all accessible entrances of the building. Pedestrian Circulation: 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2) COMMENT: Continuous pedestrian circulation paths are required with all development (TS 7.01.3.3). A) The pedestrian path must be connected to all public access areas of the development and to any adjacent streets (TS 7-01.3.3.A). B) "The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas" (TS 7-01.3.3.B). C) "Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required in compliance with the city's adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.2). "Pedestrian circulation paths designed for barrier-free accessibility for the physically disabled and located within any development are regulated by the adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.3.C). Insure and provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ADA Standards: 403.3 Slope. "The running slope of walking surfaces shall not be steeper that 1:20: The cross slope of the walking surfaces shall not be steeper that 1:48." 3) COMMENT: Clearly indicated, on the site plan (Sheet 3 of 8) and detail A (Sheet 7 of 8), that the maximum running slope is five percent (5%) for the decomposed granite (DG) pathway throughout the park. Also demonstrate that the maximum cross slope is two percent (2%) for the same path on the preceding sheets. Remove the word "existing" for key note five. You may want to provide a new memorandum for and administrative waiver to match the current code (Unified Development Code). |
| 11/19/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/19/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/24/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |