Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0167
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2016 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car 1545 N. Stone Avenue. Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2016 DUE DATE: January 25, 2016 COMMENTS: The following comments are based on the information provided on sheet SPS100. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 12, 2016. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 1. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the page number and number of pages on sheet SPS100. COMMENT: Provide the page number and the total number of pages on all sheets (i.e., sheet xx of 4) 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 3. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Label the sections corners on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4. This comment was not addressed correctly. The existing use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE" and the proposed use should be listed as "VEHICLE RENTAL AND SALES SUBJECT TO USE SPECIFIC STANDARDS 4.9.9.G.1 & .2". COMMENT: Provide a general note stating the existing and proposed use per the UDC and list any applicable use specific standards. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5. COMMENT: Zoning acknowledges that a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) has been approved for this site. Provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the TSMR case number , date of approval, what was modified and if applicable any conditions of approval. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage; 6. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "LOT COVERAGE" as lot coverage is not applicable. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 7. This comment was not addressed correctly. Based on the plan there are only twenty-three vehicle parking spaces provided, not 35 as the calculation shows. COMMENT: The provided number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Based on the required 45' half future ROW along Stone the two (2) eastern most vehicle parking spaces located within the future ROW may not be counted as provide vehicle parking spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 8. This comment was not addressed. Cleary show how the requirements of UDC 7.4.9.B.1.e, and 7.4.9.B.2.a, .f, & .g. COMMENT: Provide a Short Term bicycle detail that demonstrates how the requirements of 7.4.9.B & .C are met. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 9. This comment was not fully addressed, at a minimum show the future curb for Stone on the plan as the street perimeter yard setback is measured to the back of future curb. COMMENT: Show the future ROW, future sidewalk and future curb for Stone on the plan. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 10. As the future curb was not shown on the plan the Stone street perimeter yard setback is not shown correctly. COMMENT: As this site boarders on a street designated on the MS&R map all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on developing area setbacks. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 1000 or greater the required street perimeter yard setback along Stone is 21' or the height of the exterior wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of future curb. Provide a street perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the future curb along Stone. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 11. This comment was not addressed. COMMENT: Provide the height of the proposed building within the footprint. Additional comments; 12. COMMENTS: Provide a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed with your next submittal. Once the above comments have been addressed Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 01/04/2016 | SSHIELD1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car 1545 N. Stone Avenue. Accessibility Review - On Site Only Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0167 TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 4, 2016 DUE DATE: January 25, 2016 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. 1. This comment was not addressed. Provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes. 2. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide grade slopes within the vehicle parking space and access aisle. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route. 3. This comment was not addressed correctly. The mounting height for the accessible sign and van sign should 7'-0", Provide a large scale sign detail including a van accessible sign. 4. This comment was not addressed. Provide running slope directional arrows, running slope percentages, cross slope directional arrows and cross slope percentages for all surfaces along the required accessible route from the proposed building entrance to accessible parking spaces and to the sidewalk located in the right-of-way per ICC A117.1-2009 403.3 and IBC 107.2.1 5. It does not appear that the proposed ramp at the accessible parking spaces will allow for safe east to west access do to the slopes of the ramp flares. Once the above comments have been addressed Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. |
| 01/07/2016 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: January 7, 2016 DUE DATE: January 25, 2016 SUBJECT: New Enterprise Rent a Car Building TO: Richard D. Oehler, RE LOCATION: 1545 N Stone Ave REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0167 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed: 1) Per UDC 7.4.6E1 show minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet at the intersection of the two PAALs since at least one of the access lanes is used to access refuse and/or recycling collection. The 18' radius line work (dashed) callout as added on sheet SPS100 is not needed and should be removed. The purpose of the 18' radius is to allow the trash trucks to maneuver at PAAL intersections without driving over curb. As such the vertical curb radius located west of the new APC location should have an 18' radius callout. Line work for the curb should also reflect this callout. See comment 4. See previous comment number 6. 2) Per AM 2-06.4.8F and AM 2-06.4.9N3 please show existing storm drainage, including roof drainage and any scuppers required to convey drainage beneath the pedestrian way in accordance with TSM 7-01.4.1E and TSM 7-01.4.3E. The roof drains shown on the north side of the proposed building should drain into a depressed landscape area to prevent this runoff from being conveyed over the proposed sidewalk along W. Lee Street. Alternatively, the drainage could be conveyed to scupper locations that pass this roof drainage under the new sidewalk. See previous comment number 20. 3) Per AM 2-06.4.9N7 please show offsite runoff acceptance points and on-site runoff discharge points. The drainage report provided with the 2nd submittal requires a 2' wide curb opening at both of the roof drains discharging from the Roberto's building and a 3' wide curb opening for the parking area that discharges from the Roberto's parking lot. Please show these curb openings as redlined on sheet SPS100. See previous comment 28 4) Per AM 2-06.4.9T and TSM 8-01.5.3E please show vehicle maneuverability to dumpster area. The drawing still needs to show an 18' radius at the PAAL intersection west of the new APC location. Please see redlines on sheet SPS100. See previous comment 30. If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov. |
| 01/08/2016 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 01/08/2016 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) UDC 7.6.4.C.2 Revise the plans to include street landscape borders. The street landscape border (south of the driveway) is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide, as measured from the MS&R right of way line. 2) UDC 7.6.4.F Any landscape materials proposed in the public street right-of-way must be approved by the City Engineer. Provide verification, in writing of any approvals received. 3) UDC 7.6.5.A Revise the plans to provide required screening materials. Screening is required for all vehicular use areas. A 5' high screen wall is required adjacent to residentially zoned property. 4) UDC 7.6.5.C.2 Screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street. Screening must be continuous and located behind or where applicable, at the back of the street landscape border. 5) AM 2-10.4.A.3 Note the height of any existing and proposed screens, walls, or fences. 6) Provide sufficient plantings and include calculations related to the vegetative coverage requirements of UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b.3. |
| 01/08/2016 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide the invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes. Clarify which is the upstream manhole - either it is 8154-10 or it is 8154-16. Identify the approximate location of the connection to the public sewer to determine which manhole is upstream and which manhole is downstream of the connection point (BCS). [Initial comment: Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location and size of water lines and water meters serving this property, and the location of any fire hydrants. b. The location and pipe diameter of public sanitary sewers and the invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. c. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. d. Any existing or proposed utility easements Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.] |