Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0167
Parcel: 11507193C

Address:
1545 N STONE AV

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0167
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
11/02/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Approved
11/02/2015 SSHIELD1 H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car 1545 N. Stone Avenue.
Accessibility Review - On Site Only
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0167

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2015

DUE DATE: November 10, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

1. Provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes.

2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route.

3. Provide a large scale sign detail including a van accessible sign.

4. Remove all references to truncated domes as detectable warnings from the plan as they are only required at passenger transit platforms and curb ramps in the public right-of-way per IBC Section 1109.10.

5. Provide running slope directional arrows, running slope percentages, cross slope directional arrows and cross slope percentages for all surfaces along the required accessible route from the proposed building entrance to accessible parking spaces and to the sidewalk located in the right-of-way per ICC A117.1-2009 403.3 and IBC 107.2.1

6. It does not appear that the proposed ramp at the accessible parking spaces will allow for safe east to west access do to the slopes of the ramp flares.
11/02/2015 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: October 22, 2015
DUE DATE: November 10, 2015
SUBJECT: New Enterprise Rent a Car Building
TO: Richard D. Oehler, RE
LOCATION: 1545 N Stone Ave
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0167
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The main concern is here are a number of notes shown on sheet CS100 that appear to be copied out of the Tucson code requirements section. Many of the requirements listed on the plan are directing the drafter/registrant to show things on the plan that are not shown. Please update this section to remove extraneous notes that have been copied and pasted out of the City of Tucson code and then include only required verbage. There are a number of items required based on TSM 7-01.2.0BB (number of parking spaces) Show items on the site plan as required by code. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per UDC 5.5.4B1a and AM 2-06.4.9H4 please show proposed underground electric service for proposed structure with line work and keynote on sheet SPS100 (ie. Sheet 4 of 4).
2) Per AM2-06.4.9H1, AM2-06.4.9S, TSM 10-01.2.7 and TSM 10-01.3.3A show proposed sidewalk on plan along entire frontage of development along Lee Street. It is acknowledged that the fire hydrant and the street sign will need to be relocated at the developer's expense in order to accommodate this required sidewalk. Please show these relocations. Any meandering of the sidewalk to avoid obsticles must comply with TSM 10-01.3.3D1
3) Per UDC 7.4.6F3, AM 2-06.4.9H2, AM 2-06.4.9O and TSM 10-01.5.3 show sight visibility triangles for both Lee Street and Stone Avenue.
4) Per UDC 7.8.1 and Per TSM 10-01.3.2C - Figure 6 show a 25' radius for the curb return onto Stone Avenue and an 18' radius for the curb return onto Lee Street. Update plan keynote 13 on sheet LP100 to reflect this requirement.
5) Per UDC 7.8.1, AM 2-06.4.9R and TSM 7-01.3.3B show pedestrian connectivity to dumpster and other required areas such as parking spaces that abut the building.
6) Per UDC 7.4.6E1 show minimum unobstructed radius of 18 feet at the intersection of the two PAALs since at least one of the access lanes is used to access refuse and/or recycling collection.
7) Per Section 5.11 of the City of Tucson Access Management Guidelines the exit side of an access connection should be designed to enable traffic leaving the site to do so efficiently. Stop-controlled connections should be of sufficient length to store three passenger cars (one passenger car = 20 feet). Figure 5-12 illustrates the recommended practices for designing driveway throat lengths (ie. > 60 feet between curb returns).
8) Per UDC 7.4.6F2b the 3' -0" high 8" x8"x16" CMU wall as called out by keynote 26 on sheet LP100 may not be placed within 2' of the proposed PAAL.
9) Per UDC 7.5.4G and AM 2-06.4.9H5c please dimension the loading zone as either a Type A or Type B loading zone with a 12 feet wide by 35 or 55 feet length respectively. Please note that Table 7.5.5-A may require 1 Type A per Storage Use Group (ie. Commercial Storage).
10) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please add the relevant case number (ie. DP15-0167).
11) Per AM 2-06.4.4C the project location map located in the upper right corner of the first sheet shall show the Section, Township, Range and section corners. The scale shall be labeled. Please add the Section, Township, Range, section corners and the word "Scale" next to the 3" = 5280' verbage.
12) Per AM 2-06.4.5 please add a sheet index.
13) Per AM 2-06.4.7A2 please list the gross area of the site. The gross area listed on sheet 1 (ie. 26,683.8 GSF - .61 Acres, appears to be in error. Please clarify if there is a defined section of the parcel to the south that is intended to be part of the gross area. There is a callout of landscape keynote 4 on sheet PSP100 that seems to indicate the intent to add an asphalt slurry seal over the existing asphalt paved area after all crack have been patched. Please clarify the intent to perform or not perform offsite work by showing limits of work or removing keynote callout on sheet PSP100 and updating gross area on sheet 1.
14) Per AM 2-06.4.7C2 list the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."
15) Per AM 2-06.4.8A please note the basis of bearing. This should include a bearing and distance from a bench mark to a property corner.
16) Per AM 2-06.4.8C please add the offsets from the right of way limits to the pavement, curbs, and sidewalk. Please also provide the recordation information for the right of way.
17) Per AM 2-06.4.9H4 please show call out streets and alleys adjacent to the site at public or private.
18) Per AM 2-06.4.8D please show waterlines on sheet SPS100 per sheet 2 of 2 of the Stone Ave, Drachman to Oro District Paving Improvement Plan No. I-539. This data may be found on our website.
19) Per AM 2-06.4.8E please provide additional spot grades based on City Of Tucson datum. Indicate the field book and page. The spot grades should be shown in such critical locations where pedestrian ramps provide access across driveways and where parking lot grades are required to provide at least a 0.5% drainage slope.
20) Per AM 2-06.4.8F and AM 2-06.4.9N3 please show existing storm drainage, including roof drainage and any scuppers required to convey drainage beneath the pedestrian way in accordance with TSM 7-01.4.1E and TSM 7-01.4.3E.
21) Per AM 2-06.4.8G and AM 2-06.4.9N2 please show the location and direction of the roof drains being directed at this site from the Roberto's Mexican Kitchen Building. See Google Street View for details.
22) Per AM 2-06.4.8H and AM 2-06.4.9N2 please show the direction and gradient of the adjacent parking area of the Roberto's Mexican Kitchen Parking Lot.
23) Per AM2-06.4.9H5d show additional detail for the bicycle parking facility including calculations.
24) Per AM2-06.4.9I please provide any additional right-of-way dedication as required per the major streets and routes plan. Please note that the Paving Plan Nos. I-539 and I-65-087 both show an existing 79.2 feet wide right of way for Stone and the major streets and routes plan requires a 90 foot wide right of way.
25) Per AM2-06.4.9J please show the future right-of-way limits if a right of way dedication is not required as part of this development package.
26) Per AM2-06.4.9L please show all proposed easements. Page SPS100 shows declares there are no easements under existing conditions. Please indicate if under proposed conditions such as for the proposed underground electric service there will be any easements.
27) Per AM2-06.4.9M and AM2-06.4.9N4 please show sufficient spot grades in the parking and discharge points from the roof drainage downspouts to show a 0.5% positive gradient at all locations.
28) Per AM 2-06.4.9N7 please show offsite runoff acceptance points and on-site runoff discharge points.
29) Per AM 2-06.4.9P1 please redirect the callout from the sewer line on Lee Street to the onsite connection such that the 4" line callout by site plan keynote 30 is referring to the onsite connection and the sewer main on Lee Street. Please show the sewer layout in both Lee Street and Stone Avenue, including main sizes, flow directions, manholes, ect.
30) Per AM 2-06.4.9T and TSM 8-01.5.3E please show vehicle maneuverability to dumpster area.
31) Per AM 2-06.4.9W please show street sign that shows up in google street view that is in conflict with the sidewalk extension along Lee Street. Please show where this sign will be relocated to. Permission from TDOT will be required for the new location.
32) Per TSM 2-01.10.4 please show minimum 2% positive drainage gradient away from the building. The landscaping that is proposed adjacent to the detailing area/garage will need to be relocated to achieve this and to comply with TSM 7-01.4.1C (sidewalk requirement between parking spaces and building). It is suggested that it be depressed and located where it can harvest storm water runoff from the parking lot.
33) Per TSM 7-01.4.1D the onsite sidewalk must connect to the sidewalk along Stone Avenue and the required sidewalk along West Lee Street.
34) Per TSM 8-01.5.2 please add additional detail to site plan keynote 8 on sheet SPS100 and reference applicable details for Solid Waste Enclosures as contained in the Section 8 of the TSM.
35) Per TSM 10-01.2.7 and TSM 10-01.3.3E please show along Lee Street and Stone Ave pedestrian ramps and minimum 2' curb way with any fire hydrant, street signs, mail boxes and water meters located in this area. Sidewalk shall have scuppers sized to take the 10 year storm water runoff underneath per TSM 7.01.4.3E and TSM 10-01.2.8
36) Per TSM 10-01.3.2B1 curbing shall be vertical or wedge curb. Please update site plan keynote 6 to clarify this requirement.
37) Per AM 2-06.4.9N and TSM Section 4-04 and the City of Tucson Drainage Standards Manual Section 5.2, item 4 please show contributing drainage area and flow area from offsite storm water originating south of this parcel as part of a drainage statement required by Section 2.1.3 of the City of Tucson Drainage Standards manual.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
11/02/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Enterprise Rent-A-Car 1545 N. Stone Avenue.
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0167

TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 3, 2015

DUE DATE: November 10, 2015

COMMENTS: The following comments are based on the information provided on sheet SPS100.

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is October 12, 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp.

1. COMMENT: Provide the PDSD Development Package approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets. The required stamp can be found at http://pdsd.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/development-permits under Development Package.

2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet.

2. COMMENT: The "INDEX OF DRAWINGS" should include all submitted drawings.

3. COMMENT: The drawing order does not appear to be correct with one of the sets submitted.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat;

4. COMMENT: Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx).

5. COMMENT: Provide the page number and the total number of pages on all sheets (i.e., sheet xx of 4)

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

6. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0167, adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

7. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

8. COMMENT: Remove the aerial photo from the location map.

2-06.4.2.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

9. COMMENT: Provide the section, township, and range for the location map.

10. COMMENT: Label the sections corners on the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

11. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating the existing and proposed use per the UDC and list any applicable use specific standards.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

12. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

13. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "LOT COVERAGE" as lot coverage is not applicable.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

14. COMMENT: Provide the existing ½ ROW for Stone and Lee.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

15. COMMENT: Provide the above information on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles (SVTs). On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

16. COMMENT: Show all required existing and future SVTs on the plan

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17. COMMENT: Provide a back-up spur per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.4 at both proposed gates or provide a note on the plan stating that the gates are to remain open during business hours.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

18. COMMENT: The provided number of vehicle parking spaces is not correct. Based on the required 45' half future ROW along Stone the two (2) eastern most vehicle parking spaces located within the future ROW may not be counted as provide vehicle parking spaces.

19. COMMENT: Provide a typical parking space detail for both a standard and accessible vehicle parking spaces.

20. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said the four (4) vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the proposed fence along Stone and Lee are required to be 10'-0" wide.

21. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H.1 Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said provide some type of barrier to prevent parking vehicles from damaging the proposed fence along the south property line.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

22. COMMENT: The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Provide the number require and provided for both Short & Long term bicycle parking. Per UDC Table 7.4.8-1 two (2) Short Term spaces are required. Per UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1.a(1) No long-term bicycle parking is required on a site where there is less than 2,500 square feet of gross floor area. The calculation should state that no Long term is required per UDC Article 7.4.8.B.1.a(1)

23. COMMENT: Provide a Short Term bicycle detail that demonstrates how the requirements of 7.4.9.B & .C are met.

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

24. COMMENT: Show the future ROW, future sidewalk and future curb for Stone on the plan.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

25. COMMENT: As this site boarders on a street designated on the MS&R map all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on developing area setbacks. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT of 1000 or greater the required street perimeter yard setback along Stone is 21' or the height of the exterior wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of future curb. Provide a street perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the future curb along Stone.

26. COMMENT: As this site boarders on a street designated on the MS&R map all street perimeter yard setbacks are based on developing area setbacks. Per UDC Table 6.4.5.C-1 ADT over 140 but less that 1000 the required street perimeter yard setback along Lee is 21' or the height of the exterior wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the outside edge of the nearest adjacent travel lane. Provide a street perimeter yard setback from the proposed building to the nearest adjacent travel lane along Lee.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

27. COMMENT: Provide the height of the proposed building within the footprint.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

28. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.3.3 provide the required pedestrian circulation to the trash enclosure.

29. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.A provide the required sidewalk to the ROW along Lee.

30. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.1.C provide the required sidewalk along the south side of the proposed detailing area/garage.

31. COMMENT: Per TSM 7-01.4.3.A demonstrate on the plan that the sidewalk are at the top of the accessible ramp meets the minimum four (4) foot width.

32. COMMENT: Provide width dimension for all proposed sidewalks on the plan.

33. COMMENT: Provide a clear width dimension from the proposed accessible signs to the building.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

34. COMMENT: If applicable show all proposed signs on the plan.

35. COMMENT: Provide a general note stating "ALL SIGN REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT".

Additional Comments

36. COMMENT: The proposed demolition of the existing building will require a separate permit. Due to the age of the existing building historic review is required prior to issuing a demo permit. Contact Jennifer Levstik, (520) 837-6961 for historic review requirements.

37. COMMENT: Remove all references to "ADAAG" from the plan as it is not applicable.

38. COMMENT: Sheet CS100 it appears that you have pasted portions of AM 2-06 on this page. As you have not fully referenced AM 2-06 and not all listed sections are applicable Zoning recommends that you remove these references from the plan.

39. COMMENT: Sheet SPS100 southwest corner of the plan there is a keynote 26, security fence, that appears to point a striped area of the plan. Clarify what the striped area is.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
11/05/2015 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Passed EXCEPTION, 2014 PHOTO
11/05/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) UDC 7.6.4.C.2 Revise the plans to include street landscape borders.

The street landscape border (south of the driveway) is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide, as measured from the MS&R right of way line.

2) UDC 7.6.4.F Any landscape materials proposed in the public street right-of-way must be approved by the City Engineer. Provide verification, in writing of any approvals received.

3) UDC 7.6.5.A Revise the plans to provide required screening materials.

Screening is required for all vehicular use areas.
A 5' high screen wall is required adjacent to residentially zoned property.

4) UDC 7.6.5.C.2 Screens along a street frontage must be located on the development side of the street landscape border so that they do not obstruct the view of the street landscape border from the street.

Screening must be continuous and located behind or where applicable, at the back of the street landscape border.

5) AM 2-10.4.A.3 Note the height of any existing and proposed screens, walls, or fences.

6) Provide sufficient plantings and include calculations related to the vegetative coverage requirements of UDC 7.6.4.C.2.b.3.
11/06/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information:
a. The location and size of water lines and water meters serving this property, and the location of any fire hydrants.
b. The location and pipe diameter of public sanitary sewers and the invert and rim elevations of the upstream and downstream manholes; along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number.
c. The locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights.
d. Any existing or proposed utility easements
Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012.
11/13/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Reqs Change November 13, 2015
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0167
PROJECT NAME: Enterprise Rent a Car
PROJECT ADDRESS: Stone Ave at W Lee Street
PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT

Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Site Plan .

The Driveway at Stone Avenue requires a turnaround or back up spur outside of Right of Way due to the propsed gate.

Gate on Lee Street is acceptable.

Driveway on Stone Avenue requires 25 ft curb return radius.

Driveway on Lee requires 18 ft curb return radius.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/23/2015 EGALLET1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
12/23/2015 EGALLET1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
12/23/2015 CPIERCE1 REJECT SHELF Completed