Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0145
Parcel: 14103025E

Address:
6455 S WILMOT RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0145
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/11/2015 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: September 11, 2015
DUE DATE: September 29, 2015
SUBJECT: Modular Building and Outdoor Storage
TO: Jeff Hunt, PE
LOCATION: 6455 South Wilmot
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0145
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The most critical issue is the placement of gravel that could contribute to the creation dust problems. The following items need to be addressed:
1) There is a discrepancy between the drainage report's 100 year flow used in the HEC-RAS print outs and cross sections vs. the narrative and figures. The HEC-RAS print outs and cross sections are based on a more upstream 100 year TSMS flow of 958 cfs. The narrative and figures are based on a more downstream TSMS flow of 1108 cfs. Please update the narrative and figures to be consistent with the TSMS flow that impacts the site prior to the confluence point downstream of the parcel being developed.
2) The last two sentences on page 23 of the SWPPP should be combined into a single sentence.
3) The first sentence of section F on page 24 of the SWPPP should use the word "an" instead of "and" to add clarity.
4) Per UDC 7.4.6I2 the surface must be maintained in a smooth, durable, and well-drained condition. Please have Cypress Civil Development perform a review of the proposed parking area surfacing material (ie. 3 inches of ½" to ¾" diameter gravel on 95% compacted soil per keynote 17) to determine its durability and drainage properties under expected loading. The Earthwork and Materials Testing and Certification note 1 on sheet 2 indicates that an engineering analysis has not yet been performed. Please update note 1 after completion of the requested engineering analysis.
5) Per TSM 10-01.3.1A3 and UDC 7.6.4-1E the minimum structural section for private pavement is dust control paving. A double shot chip seal is acceptable to the City Of Tucson but will require evaluation and approval by the Civil Engineer and an update to the developed conditions discharge design and a new detention/retention design. Per Chapter 26-8(b)(2)a. please make all appropriate updates to the pavement design and the drainage report as applicable.
6) Per Chapter 26-10(a) and Chapter 26-10(b)(1) please update the drainage report to show detention such that the flooding peak discharge is no greater than pre-developed conditions. If the engineer can clearly demonstrate that detention at the site does not provide off-site flood relief due to the parcel size, location within the drainage basin, or other factors a fee may be paid to the City of Tucson in place of retention/detention per Chapter 26-10(e). This fee should be calculated as part of the drainage report and the amount listed as a general note on the plan and paid at the time of permitting.
7) Per Chapter 26-8(b)(2)b. and Chapter 26-11.2(a)(2)e. please perform an encroachment analysis for any grade changes due to parking lot paving or grading within the 100 year floodplain limits.
8) Per Chapter 26-8(b)(4) please show the regulatory floodplains and erosion hazard setback limits in a surveyable manner.
9) Per Chapter 26-8(b)(5) please add a general note to include the drainage area(s) and their respective base flood peak discharges.
10) Per UDC 7.4.6F2b the PAAL must be setback at least 2 feet from the building. Please add dimension to show the back-up-spur as called for in UDC 7.4.6F4 is at least 2 feet from the new building as shown on sheet 4.
11) Per UDC 7.4.6F4 a back-up spur of at least 3 feet is required at the end of all PAALs.
12) Per TSM 7-01.4.3E please show positive drainage slope away from the sidewalk for the parking proposed south of the structure. Alternatively, please show how any drainage routed towards the sidewalk is conveyed beneath the sidewalk during the 10 year storm.
13) Per Section 12.3, item 3 of the Tucson Drainage Standards Manual (ie. TSM 4-04), Please show a prominent sign posted at the entrance to the parking area that contains the following words: "Warning, this parking lot is subject to periodic flooding at depths of up to two feet. No unattended or overnight parking is permitted." Per Chapter 26-8(a)(1) of the Tucson Code, please delineate the area where flow will exceed one foot of flow during the 100 year storm and eliminate parking in that area.
14) Per TSM 7-01.4.1A please provide sidewalk along the western frontage of the project in addition to that shown on the southern frontage.
15) Per TSM 7-01.4.1B a sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Please update plan to show sidewalk next to the proposed building where a PAAL is proposed.
16) Per Section 5.2, item 1 of the Tucson Drainage Standards Manual, please further define offsite flow watershed to show where flow enters the property from the upstream development based on actual discharge points. The Century Park Research Center, Lots 30, 31 and 32 Development shows a 100 year discharge of 112 cfs at the South west corner of this proposed site. Sheet 18 of the Century Park Research Center Paving and Sewer Plans shows additional watershed area being discharged towards the entryway of the proposed development (DP15-0145) from adjacent existing and proposed developments (ie. Portions of lots 22, 23, 30, 31 and 32 of Century Park Research Center). Sheet 6 of the Century Park Research Center Paving and Sewer Plans shows a flow value from the street section. Please update the watershed delineation and Hydrologic Data Sheet for OWS2.
17) Per Section 5.2, item 6 of the Tucson Drainage Standards Manual, a floodplain use permit will be required for any development of the floodplain. Please submit an application with you next submittal.
18) Per AM 2-06.4.7B2b please add a general note that says, "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificate are required."
19) Per AM2-06.4.8C please dimension the width of paving adjacent to development.
20) Per TSM 8-01.4.0C please show how the required solid waste container shall be screened from public view, and from adjacent developments.
21) Per TSM 8-01.4.0G please provide a copy of approval from the City of Tucson Environmental Services Department for use of an APC. There is an engineering concern that the large number of offsite vehicles utilizing the facility may produce additional refuse.
22) Per TSM 8-01.6.3B please show where the APC could be placed between the curb and the sidewalk while leaving at least a four foot clear space per figure 8.
23) Per Chapter 26-7 and 27-8(b)(1)of the Tucson Code and the Drainage Standards Manual Section 7.4, item 1 please show erosion hazard setback limits in Drainage Report and on Development Plan Package using equation 7.8.
24) Per Pima County City Of Tucson SD 207 there are callouts on sheet 4 for top of curb (TC) within the handicap ramp areas that should be finished surface (FS) call outs based on grade, slope and drainage requirements. Please update accordingly.
25) Per Chapter 26-11.2(f)(5) the location of the hazardous material storage area may need to be relocated if it falls into the erosion hazard setback area as measured from the floodplain limits or top of outermost channel bank. This will require an update of sheet 7 of the development plan package and the large exhibit found within the storm water pollution prevention plan.
26) Per Chapter 26-11.2(f)(2) please do not place the fiber role in the bottom of the wash. This could get washed downstream and cause injuries to vehicular traffic along Wilmot Road. Please update sheet 7 and the SWPPP to reflect placement of this fiber role further up on the channel bank. Please note that page 16 of the SWPPP indicates that the suggested method of placement for fiber rolls is at the top and along the face of exposed slopes.
27) Per AM 2-06.4.2B please provide a brief legal description of the property within the title block.
28) Please place the table of contents before the narrative pages in the drainage report.
29) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please provide the development package number (DP15-0145) and the floodplain use permit number (to be determined) to the title block area.
30) Per AM 2-06.4.7A6c please add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riperian Area. This may be supplemented by the Landscaping reviewer.
31) Per AM 2-06.4.9H3 please indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability.
32) Per AM 2-06.4.9N1 please show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits and water surface elevations.
33) Per AM 2-06.4.9N2 please show proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow.
34) Per AM 2-06.4.9N3 please show locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts.
35) Per AM 2.06.4.9N4 please show all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage.
36) Per TSM 2-01.4.1F(b) please show the limiting dimensions and depth of cut and fill.
37) Per TSM 2-01.4.1D please provide a soils report to determine an appropriate pavement section and grading, including slope protection requirements.
38) The Hydrologic Soils Group lists the Stagecoach-Sahuarita soil group as having an A rating. The NRCS lists Stagecoach as having an A rating but lists Sahuarita as having a C rating. Per TSM 4-01.2.1B please clarify infiltration rate for this area for purposes of evaluating retention/percolation areas.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.

Elliott,

The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed a preliminary review of the solid waste management activities proposed for the 6455 S. Wilmot Road property. ES agrees, on a preliminary basis, with the use of one 90 gallon APC to serve the property.


The following items should be included on the Development Plans:


•A note shall be placed on the plan set providing the waste stream calculations prepared in accordance with Section 8-01.8.0 of TSM 8.
•A note shall be placed on the plan set specifying the anticipated frequency and method of waste collection based on the waste stream calculations.
The APC shall be screened from public view and from adjacent developments. The method of screening the APC should be described on the Development Plan.

Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this review.

Thomas G. Ryan, P. E.
City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department
09/22/2015 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: David Rivera
Principal Planner

PROJECT: DP14-0145
Address: 6455 S Wilmot Road
Development Package: Personal Storage Use - I-2 Zoning

TRANSMITTAL DATE:

DUE DATE: September 29, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 31, 2016.


2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

01. COMMENT: List the project name in the title block of all plan sheets.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan.

02. COMMENT: This parcel is subject to compliance with the Davis Monthan AEZ requirements. Review the AEZ overlay layer and draw and label the overlays that are applicable to this parcel.
******************************************************************************************



2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area.

03. COMMENT: This parcel appears to be within a Mapped Riparian area. Refer to the Landscape reviewers comments related to the possible requirements related to a protected riparian area.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

04. COMMENT: Provide the information as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

05. COMMENT: It is clear that Wilmot Road is not fully developed along the frontage of the subject site. However the development shall be designed to meet the future setbacks requirements from the future back of curb location. Draw, label and dimension the future curb and sidewalk on Wilmot Road based on a 150 foot cross section. Dimension any the building setback from the back of the future curb. Littletown Road is not listed as a major street on the adopted MS&R plan. It is suggested that contact be made with TDOT to verify the final location of the curb and sidewalk on Littletown Road. Applicable building setbacks along Littletown Road will have to be provided based on the future location of the curb.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner.

06. COMMENT: Clarify if the area along the north and northeast sides of the proposed development will be preserved as open space.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements.

07. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications across the streets as noted by the standard above.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

08. COMMENT: The future sight visibility triangles based on the future curb locations, must be drawn and labeled.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

09. COMMENT: All storage areas must be paved with a minimum of 2 shot chip seal. Gravel is not an allowed material for vehicular uses areas. Revise the note related to the surfacing material.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

10. COMMENT: Per the parking calculation note on the cover sheet, two parking spaces are required and 3 have been provided which includes a HC space. The HC space must be designed with Van Accessible parking space dimensions. Revise the detail for a van accessible space and the parking areas on the site plans sheets to depict a van accessible parking space.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

11. COMMENT: The short term facility must be within 50 feet of the front entrance of the office building. Label the distance to the front door including the ramp distance.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan

2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan.
2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently.

12. COMMENT: Once the DP site plan is approved, the grading plan is approved. Any changes that are made to the site plan sheet must be made to grading and landscape plan sheets.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

13. COMMENT: Draw and label the proposed building setbacks to the office building from the Littletown future back of curb and from the east property line.
******************************************************************************************


2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

14. COMMENT: Label the cross slopes for the sidewalk. Label the running and cross slopes for the ramps. Label the clear space width of the proposed ramps.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual.

15. COMMENT: Ensure that the slopes of the ramps in the right of way comply with ADAAG standards. See engineering comments.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.T - Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Section 8-01.0.0, Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal, Collection, and Storage, of the Technical Standards Manual. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that section, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

16. COMMENT: Indicate on the site plan sheet the type of refuse collection to be used. See engineering comments related to this standard.
******************************************************************************************

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

17. COMMENT: Refer to the Landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening. Address the comments as required.
******************************************************************************************

18. COMMENT: Be aware that additional comments may be forthcoming based on revisions to the plans and responses to the zoning comments.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
09/23/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change Per chapter 5 of the 2012 International Fire Code, a fire hydrant and an approved fire department access road to the hydrant (with turnaround) is required to be within 600' of all parts of the facility. Also, check the scale on your drawings.
09/24/2015 DRIVERA1 ADA REVIEW Reqs Change see zoning comments.
09/29/2015 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change 1) TSM 4-01 Exhibit A 3.1
"Catchment areas are locations at a site from which water is harvested for beneficial use. These locations include areas where rain falls directly into earthen basins and infiltrates into the ground (these are known as Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas. Catchment areas also include locations where rain falls on rooftops, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways and other hard surfaces then flows toward Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas where the water infiltrates into the soil."

2) Map the proposed catchment area (SF indicated in the table). Except for infiltration areas, the catchment area is comprised of parking lots, roof-tops, or other hard surface around the plant that drains to that area. If the proposed parking surfaces do not produce runoff as effectively as standard paving, the calculations will need to be modified to reflect the reduction.

3) TSM 4-01.3.2.C Provide a grading plan that reflects the proposed 6" Water Harvesting Infiltration Areas.

4) TSM 4-01.3.2.D Notes shall be provided on the Implementation Plan to ensure current and subsequent site owners and operators are informed of the inspection and maintenance required in Section 4-01.6.0, Compliance.

5) TSM 4-01.4.2.A Irrigation systems shall be fitted with irrigation controllers and shall be capable of monitoring and responding to plant water needs through the use of soil moisture gauges, tensiometers, weather stations, and/or evapotranspiration data. The irrigation technology chosen should be capable of preventing the irrigation system from running if sufficient soil moisture is present to support the vegetation. All systems shall include rain shut-off devices. Instruments shall be correctly placed to ensure plants are kept healthy using a combination of harvested and non-harvested water and to ensure the stated water-saving goal of the ordinance is met.

6) UDC 7.6.5.A Screening for individual land uses and zones must be provided as determined in Table 7.6.4-1 and in addition to the required landscape borders.

7) TSM 4-02.2.4 All tentative plats, site plans, plot plans or other plans providing for approval of development within property that includes any regulated area as defined in Section 4-02.2.2.A, ERZ Watercourses, shall identify and delineate the regulated areas and the protected riparian area on the property and shall comply with this standard. The boundary of the regulated area and the protected riparian area should be clearly depicted on applicable submittal documents.

8) TSM 4-02.2.5.B Applicants are required to submit an Environmental Resource Report as defined in Section 11.4.6 of the UDC. The supporting material for preparation of the Environmental Resource Report is based on information from the Hydrologic Data and Wash Information maps on the Tucson Department of Transportation internet web site: The Critical and Sensitive Wildlife Habitat Map and Report, the Mayor and Council Interim Watercourse Improvement Policy and subsequent adopted policies, the Tucson Stormwater Management Study, the following Basin Management Plans: 1) West Branch, Santa Cruz; 2) Houghton East; 3) Este Wash; and 4) Arroyo Chico. the Tucson Stormwater Management Study, Phase II and field observation.
TSM 4-02.2.5.B.3.b.3 A description of the maintenance program that provides for revegetated/restored or enhanced areas. The program shall include irrigation to establish native plants, provide for regular inspection, removal of invasive species, and native plant replacement as necessary to successfully establish the mitigation habitat. All mitigation plantings and related improvements shall be maintained for at least three years following installation.

9) TSM 4-02.2.6.D Where the protected riparian area is on property that remains under the ownership of a single person or entity following the development, the protected riparian area shall be protected through a conservation or public easement or other legal restriction upon further development.

10) AD 2-10.4.2 Landscape plans submitted for review do not necessarily have to be complete working drawings ready for contractual work. However, all required landscaping and screening will be clearly shown in sufficient detail as to readily convey the intent to comply. Plans will include a planting plan, an irrigation plan, a grading plan, and construction details, each with applicable legend, key, symbols, sizes, quantities, and notes.
Include plant quantities and symbols for each species on the landscape plans.

11) UDC 7.7.5.C.5 On-site monitoring of all aspects of site clearing, grading, plant protection, preservation, salvage, and mitigation must be provided during project construction at the expense of the developer for all residential development that is over five acres and for all commercial and industrial development that is over one acre. The monitoring must be performed by an individual who is qualified in arid lands native plant resource identification and protection as specified in Section 7.7.4.D, Professional Expertise. The monitor must provide periodic progress reports to the developer outlining the status of work accomplished and any problems encountered. A copy of these reports must be submitted to the PDSD for the project file.

12) UDC 7.7.5.C.6 The monitor is responsible for an assessment of the condition of the site's plants one year after the final inspection has been performed on the site. The monitor shall visit the site and prepare a report on plant status, including general plant condition, the identification of plants under stress and the appropriate method to relieve the stress, and recommendations for replacement of plants that are dead or dying. Dead or dying plants must be replaced with the same size plant at a one-to-one ratio of like genus and species. Copies of the report must be submitted to the site owner/developer and to PDSD. The owner must respond to the plant needs as outlined in the status report within six months of report submittal or within a shorter period if required to improve the health of stressed plants and prevent plant loss.

13) UDC 7.7.4.E The Plan shall affirm, by a statement on the Plan, conformance with the requirements of the Federal Endangered Species Act and the Arizona Native Plant Law. Applicants are advised that required salvage permits that must be obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for the applicable Endangered and Threatened genus and species and required notification that must be provided to the Arizona Department of Agriculture prior to site modification.

14) UDC 7.7.4.A A Native Plant Preservation Plan in accordance with Section 2-12.0.0 of the Administrative Manual is required for all projects under the applicability of this section according to the methodology selected by the applicant as outlined in Section 7.7.5, Plant Preservation Standards.
Title the sheet "Native Plant Preservation Plan" and use the term in the sheet index on sheet 1.

15) UDC 7.7.4.A If buffelgrass is present, populations are to be mapped and included as part of the Native Plant Preservation Plan or the Environmental Resource Report . Continued buffelgrass eradication and monitoring methodology, including common areas, is required for developed and undeveloped portions of a site .

16) TSM 4-02.2.3.A.4 Analysis and mitigation of vegetative resources in the floodplain are required to include Tobosa grass (Pleuraphis mutica), especially where dominant.
09/29/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
09/29/2015 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change See relevant comments under the Landscape Review.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
05/24/2016 ARUIZ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed