Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0141
Parcel: 119413710

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP15-0141
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/01/2015 KROBLES1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/01/2015 TOM MARTINEZ OTHER AGENCIES AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION Reqs Change Was there any type of traffic analysis done for the development a TIA or Traffic Statement? If so, Regional Traffic would like a copy for our records.
If there is no document I will send a copy of the new requirements detailing the need for such a report. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09/01/2015 BVIESTE1 TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Approved See additional document in PRO.

Good morning,

Here is our response letter for water availability request on 3820 S. Pandora Ave.

Kellie Anderson
Tucson Water/New Development
Administrative Assistant
520-837-2165
520-791-4718
520-791-2501 (fax)
Kellie.Anderson@tucsonaz.gov
09/09/2015 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: September 15, 2015
DUE DATE: September 25, 2015
SUBJECT: Dynamite Car Wash Development Package- Engineering Review
TO: WLB Group Inc.; Attn: Gary Grizzle
LOCATION: 3820 S Pandora Ave; T14S R13E Sec35
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0141

SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Package, Drainage Report (WLB Group Inc., 26AUG15), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon Consultants, Inc., 01JUL15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification:
http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

The following items need to be addressed:

SITE PLAN:

1) AM Sec.2-06.3.6: Revise the development package to remove the administrative address from the 3x5 inch space. The address should be provided adjacent to the Title Block. The 3x5 inch space must remain clear for use by Pima County Addressing.

2) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Package case number (DP15-0141) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.C.2: Revise the development package and Streets and Roads Note #1 to provide a reference to the code section; "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual."

4) TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.D: Revise the development package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section; "A single property owner, property management company, or home owners association (HOA), will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area(s) for all development/business occupants." Where a development is intending to provide centralized storage and collection to serve multiple buildings, tenants, or businesses, a general note must be included within the plan.

5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development package to dimension the existing width of curb to property line and existing sidewalk widths within the right-of-ways for Ajo Way and Pandora Ave.

6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development package to label and dimension all areas of drive through or access lanes on site. Specifically the width of the lanes associated with the self serve pay islands and the exit lane area. Also dimension the width of the entry access lane to the south of the proposed refuse container.

7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.M: Revise the development package and General Note #27 on Sheet 4 to provide the correct reference to the City of Tucson Technical Standards Manual Sec.2-01 (excavation and grading requirements). The provided reference is no longer applicable.

8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N: Revise the development package and Keynote #16 on Sheet 4 to correctly point to the proposed improvement.

9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package and Keynote #3 (on all sheets) to provide the correct sidewalk detail call out for a Pima County/City of Tucson Standard Detail for Public Improvement.

10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package and Keynote #14 (on all sheets) to provide the correct handicap access ramp detail call out. The proposed detail reference can only be used within the public right-of-way. All onsite handicap improvements must meet ANSI guidelines.

11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from the Zoning Reviewer for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development package and Detail 4/6 to provide all aspects of the proposed refuse enclosure construction. Label the 12-foot enclosure length, the 4- 1 inch galvanized pipes and anchors, minimum enclosure gate framing requirements, etc. Refer to Figure 3B for a single metal container enclosure.

13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Provide approval from ES for the proposed single container enclosure. New development requires a double enclosure to accommodate both refuse and recycling.

GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
09/14/2015 BVIESTE1 UTILITIES SOUTHWEST GAS Approved See additional documents in PRO.

Please see attached.

Arthur Lason| Engineering Technician, Engineering


PO Box 26500 | 36O-580 | Tucson, AZ 85726.6500
direct 520.794.6218 | fax 520.794.6166 | mobile 520.247.9592
art.lason@swgas.com | www.swgas.com | www.swgasliving.com
09/15/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Dynamite Car Wash
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0140

TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 16, 2015

DUE DATE: September 25, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is August 26, 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0141, adjacent to the title block on all sheet.

2. COMMENT: Remove the title block from the box shown on sheet 1 and provide the address adjacent to the title block on all sheet.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

3. COMMENT: Remove all subdivision references from the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

4. COMMENT: Revise Zoning and Land Use Note 4 to include use specific standard 4.9.13.O.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.b - Percentage and area in square feet of building and accessory building coverage;

5. COMMENT: Remove all references to lot coverage as it is no longer applicable.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

6. COMMENT: Provide dimensioned widths for the pavement, curb and sidewalk along Ajo Way and sidewalk along Pandora Avenue.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

7. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for the access lanes at the "SELF SERVE PAY ISLANDS".

8. COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for the access lane south of the proposed trash enclosure.

9. COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Access lanes and PAALs must be setback at least two feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction over six inches. That said provide a dimension from the south corner of the trash enclosure to the access lane.

2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown.

10. COMMENT: Provide a building street perimeter yard setback dimension to Pandora Avenue. Per a Zoning Administrator determination as this site boarders on an MS&R route the street perimeter yard setbacks are based on UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2 and Table 6.4.5.C-1. Based on an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of over 140 but less than 1,000 the setback is measured from the outside edge of adjacent travel lane.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

11. COMMENT: Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs. Also provide a note stating "ALL SIGNAGE REQUIRES A SEPARATE PERMIT".

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package
09/16/2015 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved See additional documents in PRO.


4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702

September 16, 2015

The WLB Group
Attn: Chris Langham
4444 E Broadway Blvd
Tucson, AZ 85711

Dear Chris:

SUBJECT: DYNAMITE CAR WASH
DP15-0141
WR #297365

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 28th, 2015. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. It is important to note that the contractor must maintain proper clearance from TEP's underground cable when completing civil work.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas, at (520) 918-8295.

Sincerely,

Natalie R Nava
Scheduling Coordinator
Design/Build
Enclosures
CC: Jennifer Necas, Tucson Electric Power Company
CC: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
09/16/2015 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
09/21/2015 BVIESTE1 OTHER AGENCIES PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS Approved See addtional documents in PRO.

No objections/adverse comments. See attached.
09/22/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
09/22/2015 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
09/24/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Rezoning case;

Subdivision case;

Board of Adjustment case;

Design Development Option case;

Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or,
Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site.

Submit a copy of the approved landscape plans pertaining to this site for reference and inspection purposes.

Add note to landscape plan as follows: Existing landscape must be installed per approved plans dated_____ (and reference activity # of approved plans)

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
09/24/2015 BVIESTE1 UTILITIES CENTURYLINK Passed
09/24/2015 BVIESTE1 POLICE REVIEW Approved I have no issues with this request.



CSO Becky Noel #37968

Tucson Police Dept.

1100 S. Alvernon

Tucson, AZ 85711

520-837-7428
09/24/2015 BVIESTE1 OTHER AGENCIES U. S. POST OFFICE Passed
09/24/2015 BVIESTE1 UTILITIES EL PASO NATURAL GAS Passed
09/25/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change Provide the rim elevation and inverts for the manhole upstream of the proposed connection to the public sewer (Pima County Wastewater Management Department reference number 3154-02).
09/25/2015 BVIESTE1 COT NON-DSD PARKS & RECREATION Approved No existing or proposed Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development.

Howard B. Dutt, RLA

Landscape Architect
Tucson Parks & Recreation
(520) 837-8040

Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov
09/25/2015 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Approv-Cond DP15-0141 is required to list as part of the General Note list, all C9-09-10 rezoning conditions as listed in Ord. No. 10794.

Proposed site for DP15-0141 was reviewed at time of rezoning C9-09-10 for applicable Plan Tucson Policies. DP15-0141 is subject to rezoning C9-09-10.
Compliance with C9-09-10 to be reviewed by Zoning Review Division for approval.
09/25/2015 BVIESTE1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Reqs Change The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal:

1. Per TSM 8-01.4.0B, add the note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1 for the intended use.

2. Revise the enclosure detail so it is in compliance with Figure 3B of TSM Section 8. Show the concrete reinforcement, wall and gate information, embedded pipe locations, etc.

3. Show the concrete slab of the enclosure to slope at 1 percent to the gate opening per TSM Section 8 Figure 3.

If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net
09/28/2015 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Passed
09/28/2015 BVIESTE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan
09/28/2015 ROBERT YOUNG PIMA COUNTY PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW Passed
09/28/2015 BVIESTE1 OTHER AGENCIES TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY Passed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/22/2015 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed