Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0140
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 09, 2015 DUE DATE: September 25, 2015 SUBJECT: Kinnison Overlook Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Rick Engineering Co., Attn: Bruce Paton LOCATION: 3775 S Prudence Rd; T14S R15E Sec29 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0140 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Package (Grading Plan), Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Co., 18FEB15), Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies, Inc., 11APR06), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Rick Engineering Co., 21AUG15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Grading Plan at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the links for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN PACKAGE: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Package case number (DP15-0140) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.2: Revise the grading plan to provide a General Note that list the total square footage of the site and the total disturbed area. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.I: Revise the grading plan to label and dimension the existing and/or future right-of-way, curb location, sidewalk width, etc. for Prudence and Escalante Road. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the grading plan, General Storm Drain Notes, and Detail G/5 to label the 18-inch bleed pipe from the basin as a reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Per TSM Sec.4-04.10.3.4 & 9 the minimum acceptable size and material for storm drains within a right-of-way is an 18-inch diameter RCP. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the grading plan to provide a General Note (or other reference) for all proposed working within the Public right-of-way. The note should state that all new roadways and proposed work within existing right-of-way will be by separate permit through TDOT Permits and Codes. GENERAL COMMENTS: Provide a revised Development Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/15/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | PDSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Kinnison Overlook Grading Plan (1st Review) DP15-0140 TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 15, 2015 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0140, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Additional comments: COMMENT: Until the above comment is addressed and the grading plan is approved by Engineering and Landscape Zoning Review cannot approve the grading plan. Zoning is willing to provide an over-the-counter review once the above comments have been addressed. Call or email to schedule an appointment for this review. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 09/24/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the grading plans will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the grading plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until all Engineering, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/08/2015 | EGALLET1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/08/2015 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/08/2015 | EGALLET1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |