Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Permit Number - DP15-0133
Review Name: RESUB - SITE/GRADING ALL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/04/2015 | SSHIELD1 | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/05/2015 | PAUL BAUGHMAN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: November 5, 2015 Due Date: November 19, 2015 Subject: CPSC Hooters 2nd submittal To: Cypress Civil Development, Jeff Hunt, PE Location: 7280 East Broadway Reviewers: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM Activity: DP15-0133 1) Please note that fees have been updated do to the updated disturbance area. 2) Per previous comment and the AM 2-06.4.0 - 4.8B please show evidence of permission from the easement holder where existing 6' electrical easement, as shown on sheet 5, is in conflict with new building or show evidence that it has been abandoned. 3) Per previous comment and the AM 2-06.4.0 - 4.88 and AM 2.06.4.0 - 4.9L please show the list of potential user(s) and recording information for the new 15' x 15' easement shown on sheet 5. Pre comment response it is the intention to provide this information after permitting. Per October 30 return email a hold may be placed on the final inspection or CofO. If this is the intent of the engineer a general note should be added to the plans indicating this is the selected option to avoid showing it at this time. 4) Per previous comment and the TSM 2-01.4.0 - 4.1C and TSM 2-01.4.0 - 4.1 D please submit the geotechnical report for pavement thickness recommendations and treatment of landscape areas adjacent to west side of structure. Comment response indicated it was submitted. My email sent October 30 to the engineer indicating I did not receive a copy was not returned. Please provide a copy for review with your third submittal. 5) Per previous comment and AM Sec4.9N5 Permits and Codes still needs to provide permission to make any drainage impacts in right of way. 6) Per previous comment and the TSM 2-01.9.3 Toe of Fill of slopes the toe of fill slope on the north side is too far from the property line. The maximum allowed by TDOT is 5 feet. Please contact me with any questions. 7) Per AM complete information for general notes 24. |
| 11/06/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Submit revised landscape plans to Gary Wittwer @ Gary.Wittwer@tucsonaz.gov for review and approval. Provide written approval for use of ROW to continue this review. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/30/2015 | EGALLET1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 11/30/2015 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 11/30/2015 | EGALLET1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |