Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0126
Review Name: GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/01/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The grading plan has been reviewed by the Landscape / NPPO Section but cannot approve the plan until Development Package has been approved and all Engineering and Zoning comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. Additional comments may apply upon subsequent reviews of the approved documents. |
| 09/03/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | September 3, 2015 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Michael St.Paul Planning Technician DP15-0126 Grading Plans for DP15-0037 Address: 1801 West Valencia Road Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Provide the Development Package numbers for this grading plan and the related Development Package. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to ensure compliance with the approved development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 09/03/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06: Grading Permit may not be issued until Tentative Plat is approved. 2) Tech Man Sec.4-03.3.5.1: Provide soils report recommendations for setback from drainage areas (100-yr flood limits) to assure buildings are setback at minimum distance. Besides pavement structural design, and setbacks, provide results of infiltration testing. (Results in soils report should be further discussed in drainage report with regard to safety factor and meeting drain down time). a) Show and label setback distances on planview sheets. 3) Tech Man Sec.2-01: Address the following grading related comments on planviews: a) Provide legible surveyable limits of 100-yr floodplain. b) Provide details for bleed pipe from subsurface retention system to outfall area of open drainage channel system. c) Add additional details/cross sections with additional dimensions for inspections purposes: i) widths of channels at bottom ii) east and west channel slope dimensions iii) outlet area, clarifying existing an proposed structures at Northeast portion of parcel. d) Assure building has labeled proposed FFE. Add note that As-builts and certification letter will be required to be submitted prior to final grading inspection. 4) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Address the following drainage related comments for report and plans: a) Provide a drainage facility maintenance list/description for HOA to use as guidelines - see handout from last meeting August 28. b) Correct drain down time requirement of 24-hrs, not 36 hours. c) Provide discussion of engineering justification of proposed subsurface retention/detention system and how drainage design meets City of Tucson requirements. d) Add clarification in report that the project is location within a 100-year FEMA floodplain zone X shaded and in an area designated as a TSMS (Tucson Stormwater Management Study) Balanced Basin Management Area, as well as the within the WBSCR (West Branch Santa Cruz River) Diversion Channel Watershed TSMS (BG). If you have questions, please contact me at (520)837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM, CFM Elizabeth.Leibold@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/2015 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |