Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0119
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/10/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0119 Address: 9056 S Houghton Road Development Package: DP15-0119 Brake Masters Development @ Houghton Town Center TRANSMITTAL DATE: DUE DATE: COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is July 30, 2016. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 01. COMMENT: Zoning has done a review of the DP even though the proposed use is not allowed in the C-1 Zone. Prior to resubmittal of the DP the property must be rezoned to a minimum of C-2 for the Brake Masters Development. The CDRC Manager and PDSD Director have been informed of the submitted plans and that the use is not allowed in the C-1 Zone. The applicant and Developer should contact Glenn Moyer with PDSD for information on the Rezoning process. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 02. COMMENT: Provide the Blank Block on the cover sheet as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 03. COMMENT: Provide a Key plan on the cover sheet. The key plan shall be of the Houghton Town Center Development. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 04. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the email address for the Owner/Developer. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 05. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD Development Package case number DP15-0119. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 06. COMMENT: The zoning as noted on the cover sheet is correct based on the current zoning of the property. However in order to have a Automotive Service Major (Brake Masters) use on this property a rezoning to a minimum of C-2 will be required. The zoning note will have to be revised once the rezoning has been completed. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 07. COMMENT: At this time Zoning is assuming that the owner / developer will apply for a rezoning of the C-1 zone portion of the lot to be developed. Currently the lot has a split zone of C-1 and I-2. The rezoning case number will have to be listed in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, conditions of rezoning will have to be listed on the plans, and copies of the conditions of rezoning document will have to be submitted with the DP. As noted in comment one (1), zoning has done a complete DP review with the assumption that a rezoning of the property will be processed. The overall design and information as required by AM 2-06 and applicable technical standards will not change as a result of the rezoning. However the conditions of rezoning will have to be addressed and compliance with the conditions of rezoning will have to be demonstrated on the DP. No additional review of this DP will be done until the rezoning process has been completed or conditions of rezoning are authorized. List each applicable UDC section number for each overlay general note that applies to this development, SZC -5.3 and AEZ, 5.6. (This property is not adjacent to the Old Vail or Houghton Road right of way so the requirements of the MS&R and Gateway Corridor do not apply.) ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 08. COMMENT: The proposed use listed on the cover sheet is incorrect. The Brake Service use is considered an Automotive Major use and is not allowed in the C-1 Zone. (A Special Exception cannot be processed for the proposed use.) If the rezoning is processed successfully, revise the use note as specified in the UDC and include the applicable Use Specific Standard i.e., "Automotive Service Major subject to UDC section 4.9.13." Correct any UDC development criteria that were listed under the C-1 to the C-2 criteria. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 09. COMMENT: As noted in comment seven (7), the property will have to be rezoned, ensure that all information relevant to the rezoning such as general notes, rezoning case number and conditions of rezoning are added to the DP cover sheet. Houghton Town Center is subject to compliance with the SCZ overlay requirements. Draw and label the 400 foot scenic corridor line that crosses the property. A copy of the Scenic corridor sheet(s) that must be updated with each development in the Houghton Town Center must be included in the DP as one of the sheets. List the SCZ in the sheet index and paginate the sheet numbers as necessary. The SCZ sheets are part of the original development and can be obtained from SBBL. Revised view sheds must be drawn and labeled on the SZC sheet(s). Houghton Town Center is also within the David Monthan AEZ Paddle. The subject property is within the NCDA, ADC-3 and Vicinity overlays of the DM AEZ. List as general note that the site has been designed to comply with the requirements of the DM AEZ. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 10. COMMENT: Remove the words "non-residential" from the floor area note on the cover sheet. Remove the lot coverage ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 11. COMMENT: After reviewing the recorded plat it does not appear that any easements were recorded over the parcel as shown on the DP site plan; however there has been a lot of "lot reconfigurations" occurring over the development site as a whole. If as a result of these lot reconfigurations easements have been recorded, draw, dimension, and label the purpose of the easement. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 12. COMMENT: Label the width of the sidewalk along the east access drive. Draw in the truncated domes on the access ramps. A sidewalk along the north access drive will have to be provided. The width of the sidewalk shall match current sidewalk conditions of the overall site. Draw and label the truncated domes at the access ramps. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 13. COMMENT: Draw the zoning boundary line that splits the property. The line shall be a different line type to differentiate the purpose of the line. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14. COMMENT: A backup spur is required at the end of a row of parking. Provide the backup spur at the west end of the south parking area. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 15. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone. Engineering reviewers can provide the turn radius requirements. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16. COMMENT: Add dimensioned detail drawings of the specific Bicycle Parking Facilities as proposed on the plan. The location of the long term facility appears to be in area that is away from the building and secluded from view. It is also in area that does not include any lighting for security. It recommended that the long term facility be located close to next to the building that provides the lighting and a more visible and secure area. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 17. COMMENT: If applicable add the easement information as noted by the standard above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 18. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed concurrently as part of the DP. Once the DP is approved by zoning the grading plan is also approved as it pertains to the Zoning Review purview only. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 19. COMMENT: Draw and label the SVTs along the north side drive entrance. See engineering comments related to SVTs. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 20. COMMENT: Truncated domes are not required on private property anymore due to revisions to the ANSI section 406. Truncated domes are still required on streets or in this case the where applicable on the sidewalk system along the access drives (access ramps). Label the actual running and cross slopes on the site plan for all sidewalks, crosswalks or access aisles, the route to the trash enclosure. The slopes shall be labeled also on the access ramps shown on the site plan. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 21. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label the location of any freestanding monument signs. Add a key note that signs are to be permitted under separate permit. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required, in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 22. COMMENT: See the Landscape Reviewer comments related to Screening and Landscape requirements. ****************************************************************************************** 23. Additional comments: a. Revise the use table on sheet 4 to correctly list the Brake Maters use as Automotive Major and list the assigned case number. b. On sheet two (2), revise the HC sign detail to include a note or depict that the seven (7) foot clearance between design grade and the bottom of the sign is based on whether the additional Van Accessible sign is used. (Van accessible signage, the seven (7) foot clearance is to be from the bottom of the Van Accessible sign.) Add the $590 fine to the HC sign. c. Review the redlines on sheets 2, 3, and 4 and revise the sheets as required. d. Zoning is assisting the Building Plans Reviewers with site ADA requirements. By addressing the comments related to the pedestrian circulation (Comment 20) the ADA requirements can also be addressed. 23. COMMENT: Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revisions to the plans and response to the zoning reviewer's comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 08/12/2015 | DRIVERA1 | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments |
| 08/12/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comments. |
| 08/19/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 08/19/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/20/2015 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/26/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Since this not engineered grading, the notes indicating as-built and certification may be removed from the plan sheets. Engineer's General Notes refers to Maricopa Association of Governments standard details and specifications. Revise to reflect local standards or ensure the standards and specifications are available for the contractor and inspectors. Provide water harvesting in all landscape areas to the maximum amount practicable. For example provide depressed areas for the whole street landscape border or explain why it is not feasible. |
| 08/28/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/09/2015 | EGALLET1 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 09/09/2015 | EGALLET1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 09/09/2015 | EGALLET1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |