Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0113
Parcel: 14010002C

Address:
3035 E BANTAM RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0113
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/18/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St Paul
Planning Technician

PROJECT: DP15-0113
3035 East Bantam Road
Personal Storage

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 25, 2015

DUE DATE: August 28, 2015

1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. Please see the final comment.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is .

2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet.

2) COMMENT: Place a key plan on the first sheet.

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet:

2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name;

3) COMMENT: The title of the project may need to be revised.


2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area;

4) COMMENT: Revise the projection map so that the subject property is in the center of the map.

2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and,

5) COMMENT: Identify the MS&Rs and the watercourses in the projection map.

2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled.

6) COMMENT: The section corners shall be revised with the projection map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage.

7) COMMENT: The gross area may need to be revised. See final comment.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

8) COMMENT: The existing use may also need to be revised. The proposed use on the plans shall most definitely need to be revised.

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

9) COMMENT: The buildings for the south (existing) parcel must be provided.

2-06.4.7.A.8.d - When the proposed site is part of a larger site, the calculations encompass the entire site, whether existing or proposed. If the project is being phased, calculations must show that, at each phase, requirements are being met.

10) COMMENT: See final comment.

2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is/are provided.

11) COMMENT: Be certain to provide all existing easements on the site plan. Provide permission to build or use the power line easement. There is also the note "TEP use area only" on the site plan sheet. Is that for the entire easement or some area more specific?

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

12) COMMENT: Provide the paving, curbs and what ever there is in the right-of-ways.

2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property.
Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction.

13) COMMENT: Provide all the reverent utility information, as described above, on and adjacent to the site.

2-06.4.8.G - Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained."

14) COMMENT: The fence locations, if that is what is depicted along the north lit, appears to be incorrect.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation

2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

15) COMMENT: Provide the future ROW information and SVTs on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

16) COMMENT: Provide the above information on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

17) COMMENT: Depict with dimensions for the entire site, as described above.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

18) COMMENT: Depict, with dimensions the short-term bicycle parking. Provide a dimensioned plan-view detail and specify and delineate the bicycle rack. See placement and lighting requirements (UDC Section 7.4.9.B and .C).

2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.)

19) COMMENT: Provide all the future ROW information on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval.

20) COMMENT: Depict, dimension and state the use(s) for any proposed easement(s).

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

21) COMMENT: Provide the building information as described above on the site plan.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

22) COMMENT: Demonstrate the appropriate pedestrian access and refuge for the south section of the commercial storage, if the sites are going to be on overall storage facility.

2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required.

23) COMMENT: All signage shall require separate sign permits.

2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements.

24) COMMENT: See comments by the landscape review section.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959.

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.

It appears that there was no approved site plan for 5450 South Country Club Road. The site plan (T01CM01299) was denied and later classified as withdrawn. As this is an expansion provide a complete site plan for the entire site. A 100% expansion should be full code for the site. The other option is to make the new site area for 3035 East Bantam Road a fully autonomous site. Do not provide cross access or parking.

Be certain to provide the calculations for the full site or just the new separate site.

Provide two copies of the revised development package site plans and one copy of the last submitted plan.
08/20/2015 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change Extention of A-Family Self Storage at 3035 East Bantam Road.
DATE: August 20, 2015
DUE DATE: August 28, 2015
Subject: Expansion of A-Family Self-Storage
TO: JAS Engineering: Attn: Jeff Stanley, PE
LOCATION: 3035 East Bantam Road
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0113
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Hydrology/Hydraulics Report (JAS Engineering 31JUL15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development at this time.
The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per AM 2-06.4.0 - 4.8B please show evidence of permission from the easement holder where existing 100' TEP electrical easement, as shown on sheet 2, is in conflict with a proposed building location (ie. new block walls and wrought iron fence) or show evidence that it has been abandoned.
2) Per the Pima County Detention/Retention Manual section 2.2, if retention is to be waived for a commercial or industrial site due to subsurface conditions, 2 to 5 year threshold detention must be provided. Since this site is located in a critical basin management area, the maximum discharge permitted from any single detention basin is 1 cfs. Per discussions with TDOT please show a properly sized detention basin/parking area and include calculations for a reverse scupper to discharge 1 cfs to the area of the existing scuppers and eventually the Earp Wash. Please note that the developed conditions 2 year flow of 7.7 cfs must be reduced until it does not exceed the 85% of existing conditions peak 2 year flow of 3.8 cfs.
3) Per AM 2-06.4.8G please clearly label all existing wrought iron fences as existing and indicate if it is to be removed or retained.
4) Per AM 2-06.4.8F please show the three existing 18" diameter reinforced concrete pipes (RCPs) and both existing sidewalk scuppers adjacent to the northwest corner of the site.
5) Per AM 2-6.4.8H please show/label the Earp Wash drainage channel adjacent to the proposed development.
6) Per the COT Drainage Standards Manual section 10.3, item 3 and TSM 10-01.4.4A1 please perform flow analysis at discharge point to show additional discharge during the 10 year storm does not exceed the street capacity standard. TDOT would prefer discharge point be moved to the west where existing scuppers are available to accept flows and flow will not worsen the ponding issue at the northwest corner of Bantam and Country Club.
7) Per the TSM 2-01.4.0 - 4.1C and TSM 2-01.4.0 - 4.1 D please submit the geotechnical report for pavement thickness recommendations and treatment of depressed landscape areas to ensure infiltration.
8) Per AM 2-06.4.7B2 a general note should be added that states a floodplain use permit is required.
9) Per AM 2-06.4.8D please add water, sewer and dry utility information in the vicinity of the site.
10) Per the COT Drainage Standards Manual section 7.6.1 please compute and delineate the erosion hazard setback from the Earp Wash.
11) Per AM 2-06.4.1 please revise development package to provide primary property owner email address.
12) Per AM 2-06.4.3 please revise development package to provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each street.
13) Per TSM 10-01.5.1A please provide sight visibility triangles at proposed entry and ensure no conflicts with proposed landscaping.
14) Per TSM 10.01.9.0 Figure 6 please provide a minimum curb radius of 18' for a PAAL/driveway connection to a local street.
08/24/2015 KEN BROUILLETTE FIRE REVIEW Reqs Change PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS THE LOCATION OF THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT AND INDICATE THAT A FIRE DEPARTMENT RAPID ENTRY DEVICE WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE GATE
08/26/2015 MSTPAUL1 ADA REVIEW Passed
08/26/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Michael St.Paul
Planning Tech

PROJECT:
Accessibility Review - On Site Only
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0113

TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 26, 2015

DUE DATE: August 28, 2015

1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

Provide an accessible route from the accessible parking space to the accessible route at the building and to all accessible entrances of the building.

Insure and provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes.

Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route.

Provide a large scale sign detail including a van accessible sign.

Provide slope directional arrows and slope percentages on the ramp of the new accessible parking and at detail A/5.

1) COMMENT: The number of required handicapped accessible parking spaces is directly related to the number of parking spaces provided. The calculation appears to be correct, but there are on plans.

Provide the last approved site plan with the accessible information on the plan or provide anew plan demonstrating the accessible information on it for the 5450 South Country Club Road portion of the site.
08/27/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

Identification and Descriptive Data

All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan.

The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet:

Relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site

UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE

ARTICLE 7: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Continuous screens along street frontages for Mobile Homes; R.V. Storage are determined by Table 7.6.4-I. Provide 6ft screening.

Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. Provide barriers for all the landscape areas.

All required screening must be provided on the developing property or a joint use agreement must be provided indicating that the adjacent wall may be used to meet the screening requirement. Joint use agreement must be provided before the plan can be approved and the recording information for the joint use agreement must be referenced on the plan. Verify that the adjoining wall complies with the height requirement as measured from the adjacent grade being developed. The requirement is measured from the use requiring the screening. The wall can not be used as a retaining wall that lowers the minimum height. A cross section should always be provided on the plan showing the adjacent grades and the measurement of the wall height. The existing block wall appears to be installed for the adjacent subdivision. Provide Joint Use Agreement or appropriate screening on the development side of site.

Provide NPP plan per UDC 7.7. or Application for Exception.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
08/27/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Reqs Change Provide NPP plan per UDC 7.7. or Application for Exception
08/28/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
10/06/2015 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed