Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP15-0099
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/06/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 07/07/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. |
| 07/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 07/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/adverse comments. No impact on trip generation. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 07/13/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technecian PROJECT: Accessibility Review - On Site Only Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0099 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2015 DUE DATE: August 3, 2015 Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. The number of required handicapped accessible parking spaces is directly related to the number of parking spaces provided. The required number of accessible parking spaces is three (3) for a parking lot with fifty-three (53) spaces (2012 IBC Section 1106.1, Table 1106.1). Provide an accessible route from the accessible parking space to the accessible route at the building and to all accessible entrances of the building. Insure and provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route. Provide a large scale sign detail including a van accessible sign. Provide slope directional arrows and slope percentages on the ramp of the new accessible parking and at detail A/5. |
| 07/13/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0099 (Rezoning case number C9-15-02) 151 South Eastbourne Avenue Parking Lot TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2015 DUE DATE: August 3, 2015 1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. These plans cannot be approved until the rezoning has been approved and finalized. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is . 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 2) COMMENT: Also place the key plan on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 3) COMMENT: Provide the email address for all of the consultants. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 4) COMMENT: Provide the rezoning conditions on the plans. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 5) COMMENT: Provide the rezoning case number and conditions on the plans. Also provide the information as to how this parking plan is related to PAD 19. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 6) COMMENT: The number of required handicapped accessible parking spaces is directly related to the number of parking spaces provided. The required number of accessible parking spaces is three (3) for a parking lot with fifty-three (53) spaces (2012 IBC Section 1106.1, Table 1106.1). Provide the accessible parking for the physically disabled and correct the parking calculation. Provide typical parking space detail for both the standard parking spaces and the accessible parking spaces. 2-06.4.9.H.5.b - If any of the required parking is located off-site as permitted by the UDC, a drawing of that parking area is to be provided, together with the city's required parking agreement (include a copy of the lease agreement if applicable) must be provided. Please remember that in these situations, if the off-site parking location is a new parking area, it must comply with all parking area requirements and must be allowed as a principal use by the zoning classification of that property. If the off-site parking area location is an existing parking lot, the parking spaces utilized for the proposed land use must be non-required parking for the existing use for which the parking area was established. 7) COMMENT: Provide the cross access agreement for the through the parking lot in PAD 19. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 8) COMMENT: Provide the recording information. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 9) COMMENT: Provide the rezoning information as described above. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 10) COMMENT: Signs require a separate permit. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 11) COMMENT: See comments by the landscaping review section. 12) COMMENT: Revise the required setbacks on the cover sheet. The requirements for the interior lot lines are 4(H) adjacent to the residential zone and zero (0) adjacent to the commercial zone (UDC Table 6.3-6.a). The setbacks to the streets are the greater of twenty (20) feet or the height to the front street and ten (10) feet to the side street (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.1). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. Provide the rezoning case with conditions, when approved. These plans cannot be approved until the rezoning has been approved and finalized. Provide the cross access agreement for the property in PAD 19. Provide any related calculations, conditions and other information with the plans. Provide two sets of the revised plans. |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See documents in PRO July 14, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for New Parking Lot, 151 South Eastbourne Avenue Development Package - CDRC No. DP15-0099 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located within and adjacent to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, existing 2" and 3"gas mains are located within the public alley south of Manchester Street and east of 151 South Eastbourne Avenue, within the right-of-way of Manchester Street, and within the right-of-way of Eastbourne Avenue. Additionally, an existing gas service serving the address of 151 South Eastbourne Avenue is also within the area of development. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) Saved at U:\ENGR - SHARED\MISC - SHARED\Procedures\SAZ Contact Info |
| 07/17/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See PRO for additional documents 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#294578 July 15, 2015 Seaver-Franks Arch Attn: F J Howard 2552 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear F J Howard: SUBJECT: Parking Lot DP15-0099 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted July 10, 2015. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Josh Necas at (520) 918-8759. Sincerely, Patty Lopez Office Support Design Enclosures CC: J.Necas - TEP DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov (City of Tucson) |
| 07/21/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 7/6/2015 2:50 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0099 Existing and Proposed Zoning: O-3 to P Proposed Use: Parking Lot Due Date: July 31, 2015 |
| 07/23/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July 24, 2015 DUE DATE: August 03, 2015 SUBJECT: Parking Lot Eastbourne Avenue Development Package- Engineering Review TO: Cypress Civil Development; Attn: Kevin Hall, PE LOCATION: 151 S Eastbourne Ave; T14S R14E Sec17 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0099 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Package and Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 15APR15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development package to provide the email addresses of the Architect and the Landscape Architect on the development package documents. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Package case number (DP15-0099) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.4: Revise the development package to reference the rezoning case number (C9-15-02) adjacent to the title block on all sheets. Provide all conditions of Rezoning in the General Note Section. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.B: Revise the development package to provide the recordation information for the abandonment of the Public Alley along the east side of the subject property. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development package to dimension the existing width of paving, curb to property line, etc. for Manchester St and Eastbourne Ave. 6) M Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: A right-of-way use permit will be required along with a separate PIA from TDOT for all improvements within the right-of-way, provide written approval for all improvements prior to development package approval. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label and dimension the proposed angled parking spaces at the south side of Manchester Street and the intersection of Eastbourne Avenue the parking space dimensions and PAAL widths cannot be verified until all dimensions and angles are provided as per UDC Article 7 Sec.7.4.6.D.1 and Table 7.4.6-1. Per Section B.2 of the PAD these parking spaces must be included under the development package DP15-097 and not the improvement plans for the parking lot. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the minimum design requirement for the new alleyway. Per UDC Sec.7.10.3 alleys must be designed in accordance with the standard street design requirements as they pertain to pavement and base material and thickness. Additionally, the design must meet minimum and maximum cross slopes requirements in accordance with Section 10-01 Technical Standards Manual. Verify that the existing clean out is protected from the new pavement. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to verify the alley is designed to operate as water conveyance systems. The design must improve drainage conditions, or at least not worsen them. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development package to provide the far side SVT with dimensions (pedestrian SVT due to the existing median) for the intersection of the proposed alleyway and Eastbourne Avenue and the near side SVT with dimensions for the intersection of Manchester St and Eastbourne Ave, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development package to dimension the width of the 2-way PAAL adjacent to the proposed access point from the parcel located to the east within PAD 19. Verify the minimum 24-foot width for the PAAL. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Provide a notarized signed letter from the adjacent property owner and a temporary construction easement for the construction of the new PAAL access point located offsite. All offsite grading and improvements on adjacent properties require a signed written agreement and a temporary construction easement from the owner and adjacent property owner for the offsite improvements. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.b: Revise the development package to label the required cross access/parking agreement for the proposed access point from the adjacent parcel. Provide the recordation information for the agreement in plan view. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.L: Revise the development package to provide the recordation information for the proposed new 20-foot Public Alley located along the southern portion of the property. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from the Zoning Reviewer for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label the required handicap access ramps within the right-of-way of Eastbourne Avenue at the alleyway locations. Provide Keynote #14 in plan view at all locations to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/27/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 07/28/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/28/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approv-Cond | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. Please address the following on the resubmittal: 1. Add a general note per TSM 8-01.4.0.B stating there shall be no refuse or recycling service within the parking lot project boundaries. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 07/29/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | July 29, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0099 PROJECT NAME: Parking Lot Eastbourne Avenue PROJECT ADDRESS: 1515 Eastbourne Avenue PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT No Traffic Engineering Issues. |
| 07/30/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 08/03/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Submit any revised plans for an additional review. |
| 08/03/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov >>> DSD_CDRC 7/6/2015 2:50 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0099 Existing and Proposed Zoning: O-3 to P |
| 08/04/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 08/04/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 08/04/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 08/04/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/04/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 08/04/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 08/04/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/25/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |