Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP15-0097
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/24/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/29/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 06/30/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO June 30, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Broadway Village - Development Package CDRC No. DP15-0097 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located within the area of development, as well as in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 2" gas main and three gas services feeding multiple meters are located within the area of development and may be impacted by this project. Additionally, two 2" gas mains are located in the right-of-way of Country Club Road and a 2" gas main is located in the right-of-way of Manchester Street. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) Saved at U:\ENGR - SHARED\MISC - SHARED\Procedures\SAZ Contact Info |
| 07/07/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Broadway Village Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2015 DUE DATE: July 23, 2015 COMMENTS: This development package has been reviewed based on the propose revisions to PAD 19. Until the proposed revised PAD has been approved, the development package cannot not be approved. Also a condition has been added that states that the rezoning for parcel 129-02-0930 must be approved prior to approval of the PAD revisions. COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is, 2016. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1) COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0097, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2) COMMENT: Provide the PAD rezoning case number, C9-11-03, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3) COMMENT: Provide the PAD amendment case number, PA-13-02, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 4) COMMENT: Per PAD 19, Part 3.A Permitted and Excluded Uses, The Broadway Village PAD shall include all those uses permitted by LUC Section 2.5.3 under C-1 zoning. The use listed under General Note 4, "SHOPPING CENTER" is not a use listed under LUC Section 2.5.3. Also as the UDC is the current governing code shopping center is not a use listed in UDC Table 4.8-4, C-1 zoning. Based on UDC Table 4.8-4 list all existing/proposed uses along with all applicable use specific standards. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 5) COMMENT: Provide a general note stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R) AND 5.5 GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE (GCZ)." 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and, 6) COMMENT: Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 7) COMMENT: Per PAD 19, Part 3.B Development Standards, second paragraph, "Prior to development plan approval, the lots south of Manchester Street will be combined via the appropriate City of Tucson process. That said provide documentation that the lot combination has been completed. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 8) COMMENT: Provide an access lane width dimension from the proposed 12 x 35 loading space, shown adjacent to the double trash enclosure, to the curb to the south. 9) COMMENT: Provide an access lane width dimension for the access lane called out under keynote 29. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 10) COMMENT: There is a vehicle parking space shown at the northwest corner of the parking area south of Manchester Street that appears to have a bollard that encroaches into the space. Clearly demonstrate that this vehicle parking space meets the minimum size requirements of UDC figure 7.4.6-A. 11) COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.F.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said there is a vehicle parking space shown near the northwest corner of the parking area south of Manchester Street that has a bollard along the north side of the parking space. This space is required to be 10' wide. Provide a vehicle parking space width dimension for the space. 12) COMMENT: It appears that the vehicle parking space calculation may need to be revised, see comment 10 above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 13) COMMENT: Per PAD 19, Part 3.B.4 Two 12 x 35 foot loading zones area required. Zoning acknowledges the 12 x35 loading space shown adjacent to the double trash enclosure but was not able to find the second required 12 x 35 loading space on the plan. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 14) COMMENT: It's not clear that the proposed short term bicycle parking meets the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.9.B.2.b, .c, .d, .g & .h. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 15) COMMENT: Provide a width dimension for the sidewalk area shown along the south side of the eastern most building. Additional Comments 16) COMMENT: Per PAD 19, Part 3.B.4 provide approvals and copies of the required maintenance agreements for all proposed improvements located within the right-of-ways. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 07/09/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See additional documents in PRO 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#293909 July 8, 2015 Seaver-Franks Architects, Inc Attn: F. Howard 4728 E. Broadway Blvd Tucson, AZ, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Howard SUBJECT: Broadway Village DP15-0097 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted November 13, 2014. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Josh Necas at (520) 918-8759 Sincerely, Patty Lopez Office Support Design Enclosures CC: J. Necas - TEP (Governmental Agency) |
| 07/13/2015 | SSHIELD1 | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Broadway Village Accessibility Review - On Site Only Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0097 TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 13, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings and any redlined plans along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Accessibility comments were addressed. Detail A, sheet 6 revise the sign detail to reference a $590.00 fine. Detail A, sheet 6 provide a 7'-0" dimension from the bottom of the "VAN ACCESSIBLE" sign to grade. |
| 07/14/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: July 14, 2015 DUE DATE: July 23, 2015 SUBJECT: Broadway Village Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Metro TED; Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 3000 E Broadway Blvd; T14S R14E Sec17 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0097 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 11JUN15), and Stormwater Pollution Prevent Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 11JUN15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development package to provide the email addresses of the primary property owner and the landscape architect on the development package documents. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Package case number (DP15-0097) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development package to reference the PAD rezoning case number (C9-11-03) adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section for the overlay(s) applicable to the site, specifically state that "This project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone and Sec.5.5, Gateway Corridor Zone (GCZ)." 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development package to dimension the existing width of curb cuts, curb to property line, etc. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Provide written approval from TDOT for the proposed location of the double refuse enclosure within the future right-of-way of Country Club Road. Per Section B.4 of the PAD the development only requires 3 trash enclosures so these specific enclosures may be removed at the time of MS&R widening. However all proposed improvements within the existing and/or future right-of-way will require prior approval from TDOT. Verify this location with the existing bus stop location. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the required 25-foot radii at the intersection of Manchester Street and Country Club Road per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed 18-foot curb return does not meet the TSM Section or the Tucson Access Management Guidelines, revise. 8) M Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the required 18-foot radii at the intersection of Manchester Street and Eastbourne Avenue per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed 15-foot curb return does not meet the TSM Section. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label and dimension the proposed angled parking spaces at the south side of Manchester Street and the intersection of Eastbourne Avenue the parking space dimensions and PAAL widths cannot be verified until all dimensions and angles are provided as per UDC Article 7 Sec.7.4.6.D.1 and Table 7.4.6-1. Per Section B.2 of the PAD these parking spaces must be included under this development and not the future improvement plans for the parking lot. A separate PIA maybe required from TDOT for all improvements within the right-of-way, provide written approval for all improvements prior to development package approval. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the existing bus stop along Country Club Road adjacent to the proposed refuse enclosures. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development package to provide the far side SVT with dimensions for the intersection of Manchester Street and Eastbourne Avenue, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development package to relocate the proposed double refuse enclosure to remain outside of the near side SVT of the intersection of Manchester Street and Country Club Road, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.1.A.1. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development package to dimension the width of the proposed driveway entrance along Manchester Street and the east side of the property. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a Revise the development package and/or associate parking space details to label and dimension the required 2.5 foot overhang for spaces adjacent to sidewalks, handicap access signs, landscape areas, wall, proposed riprap swale, etc. Refer to UDC Figure 7.4.6-C for the 2.5 foot overhang dimension. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.c: Provide the required executed maintenance agreement as stated in Section B.4 of the PAD for the proposed access and maneuvering of the loading space within the right-of-way of Eastbourne Avenue. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from the Zoning Reviewer for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to dimension the pedestrian access width for the sidewalk located along the south side of the eastern building adjacent to the refuse enclosure. 18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk within the right-of-way of Manchester Street. The proposed 3-foot width does not meet the Technical Standard Manuel or the requirements of the PAD (Page 51). 19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label the required handicap access ramps within the right-of-way of Manchester Street at all driveway locations. Provide Keynote #21 in plan view at all locations where the ramps are required. 20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label the required handicap access ramp within the right-of-way of Eastbourne Avenue along the south side of the driveway entrance. Provide Keynote #21 in plan view at this location to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement. 21) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to provide the recordation information for the public sidewalk located along the eastside of Eastbourne Avenue that falls within the private property. Public access cannot be on private property without a pedestrian easement. After review of the PAD it does not appear that this was covered and the recordation information or a new easement will be required. 22) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Provide written approval for the proposed refuse collection location from the right-of-way of Manchester Street. Per TSM Sec.8-01.5.3.G specifically Figure 1 this type of collection requires prior approval from Environmental Services (ES) in writing. Any deviation from the standard will require a Technical Standard Modification Request (TSMR), it is advisable that prior to submitting the TSMR to contact ES to see if they would support the modifications. 23) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Provide the required executed maintenance agreement as stated in Section B.4 of the PAD for the proposed access and maneuvering of the refuse enclosure within the right-of-way of Manchester Street. The proposed location of 2 refuse enclosures fall offsite and within the public right-of-way. Provide an easement for construction, maintenance and use of the right-of-way from TDOT and Real Property. 24) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development package to angle the proposed refuse enclosures so that the angled enclosure door does not encroach into the 14'x40' clear approach of the adjacent enclosure. SWPPP: 25) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES 2013 Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan package. Provide both copies with resubmittal for stamp approval. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Due to the comments generated on the first review additional comments maybe forth coming based on the second review. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/20/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. The points of connection to existing public sewers. b. The first floor elevation for the buildings Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual No. 2-06.0.0, Section 4.8 and Section 107.2.13, IBC 2012. |
| 07/20/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | July 20, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0097 PROJECT NAME: Broadway Village PROJECT ADDRESS: 3000 E Broadway Blvd PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: TDOT requires the following items must be revised or added to the development plan for approval. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. From Requirements by PDSD Engineering: 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Provide written approval from TDOT for the proposed location of the double refuse enclosure within the future right-of-way of Country Club Road. Per Section B.4 of the PAD the development only requires 3 trash enclosures so these specific enclosures may be removed at the time of MS&R widening. However all proposed improvements within the existing and/or future right-of-way will require prior approval from TDOT. Verify this location with the existing bus stop location. TDOT will support the trash enclosures within the future right of way: TDOT concurs with the following comments from PDSD Engineering: 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the required 25-foot radii at the intersection of Manchester Street and Country Club Road per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed 18-foot curb return does not meet the TSM Section or the Tucson Access Management Guidelines, revise. 8) M Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the required 18-foot radii at the intersection of Manchester Street and Eastbourne Avenue per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed 15-foot curb return does not meet the TSM Section. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.2: Revise the development package to provide the far side SVT with dimensions for the intersection of Manchester Street and Eastbourne Avenue, refer to TSM Sec.10-01.5.3 for line of sight matrix. 18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label and dimension the required 5-foot sidewalk within the right-of-way of Manchester Street. The proposed 3-foot width does not meet the Technical Standard Manuel or the requirements of the PAD (Page 51). 19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development package to label the required handicap access ramps within the right-of-way of Manchester Street at all driveway locations. Provide Keynote #21 in plan view at all locations where the ramps are required. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/20/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Completed | |
| 07/21/2015 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No planned or existing Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov >>> DSD_CDRC 6/24/2015 9:33 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0097 Existing and Proposed Zoning: PAD Proposed Use: Commercial Due Date: July 22, 2015 |
| 07/21/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 6/24/2015 9:33 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0097 Existing and Proposed Zoning: PAD Proposed Use: Commercial Due Date: July 22, 2015 |
| 07/22/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. This site is part of Planned Area Development; verify the landscape plan submitted meets the following criteria. Broadway Village Planned Area Development PAD-19 D. Landscape Program Parking Area Landscape Zone Landscape within the parking area zone, which includes the landscape treatment along Manchester Street and portions of Eastbourne Avenue within the PAD, will be designed and planned with four goals in mind: efficient and safe circulation (pedestrian and vehicular), urban heat island mitigation, rainwater harvesting, and screening from adjacent residential neighbors. The predominant tree in this zone will be a non-fruiting Olive tree (Olea europea 'Swan Hill' or "Wilsoni'). This tree has a moderate growth rate, thrives in high reflectivity areas such as parking lots, and is low water use. This tree also has been historically used on the site and within the surrounding established neighborhoods. Parking area shade trees will be provided at a rate of 1 tree per four stalls. Broadway Village Planned Area Development Planned Area Development 40 Parking screening (in the form of plants and/or low walls) will be provided for the areas adjacent to and visible from Broadway Boulevard and Country Club Road (accessed from Eastbourne Avenue and Manchester Street). No screening will be provided within sight visibility triangles. All new tree plantings will provide a minimum root zone area of 300 cubic feet (maximum 3-foot depth) with soil compaction of 90 percent or less; use of structured soil will allow compactions of 95 percent or greater. Alternatively, trees shall be irrigated by means of a deep root watering system such as, but not limited to, a 3-inch diameter, 30-inch deep perforated pipe with drip emitters in pipe and on surface (two pipes per tree). Other measures that may ensure deep and healthy tree root zone development may also be employed at the approval of the City of Tucson. Note: Street landscape borders must be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five feet of the required ten foot width may be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area on MS&R streets. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/22/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 07/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 07/22/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 07/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 07/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 07/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 07/23/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 07/23/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) all items requested by staff 3) All items needed to approve the plans |
| 07/23/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Approved | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and is approved. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/04/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Approved |