Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0093
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/18/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/22/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0093 Address: 2385 N. Silverbell Road Development Package - New CVS Store: TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 22, 2015 DUE DATE: July 15, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is June 15, 2016. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 01. COMMENT: List the owner, developer, and Landscape Architects email addresses. The Landscape Architects information shall be listed on the cover sheet. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 02. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD DP case number DP15-0093. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, including the landscape and NPPO sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 03. COMMENT: This development is subject to compliance with the development criteria of the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. Address the following comments specifically related to the SCZ and add the applicable notes or calculations. Add a Scenic Corridor notes and calc's text block or add the required notes and calc's under the general notes on the cover sheet. The scenic corridor info should be together for easy reference. SCZ Notes and required calculations: PERMITTED IMPROVEMENTS: Demonstrate compliance with Art. 5 section 5.3.1.C.1. Add the calculation for the driveway square footage. Trenching for the placement of utility lines, if the area is re-vegetated in accordance with Section 5.3.4.D, Re-vegetation of Site; An area not larger than 18 square feet and not exceeding 30 inches in height per lot or parcel for the placement of utility transformers, pedestals, and service meters and hookups for utilities; and, Selected vegetation may be removed when the Department of Transportation determines that removal is necessary for public safety if the removed plants are replaced with native vegetation. RE-VEGETATION OF SITE: Any portion of the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way disturbed by development activity shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. Within the SCZ, excluding the Scenic Routes buffer area, all disturbed areas on the site that are visible from the Scenic Route and are not covered by permanent improvements shall be re-vegetated with native plants, plants from the Drought Tolerant Plant List, or a combination of both. In areas not visible from the Scenic Corridor Zone, vegetation may consist of native plants indigenous to the site or drought tolerant plant material. Oasis area landscaping material may also be planted within this area at the levels permitted by the landscaping ordinance. CUT AND FILL: Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one foot rise or fall over a three foot length. STRUCTURE HEIGHT: Nonresidential structures shall not exceed 30 feet in height. SITING AND VIEW CORRIDORS: Draw and label and dimension the view corridors on the sheet four (4). UTILITIES: All new utilities for development on private property and on public right-of-way along Scenic Routes shall be underground. ADDITIONAL DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS: Building or structure surfaces, that are visible from the Scenic Route, shall have colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones. Signs shall use colors that are predominant within the surrounding landscape, such as desert and earth tones; No commercial advertising sign, except a sign pertaining to a use conducted on the premises or a sign advertising the sale or lease of the property upon which the sign is located, and no billboard shall be erected within 400 feet of the right-of-way line on any Scenic Route; and, When the standards of this section and Section 3-32 conflict, the more restrictive of the two prevails. ***************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building; 04. COMMENT: Clarify if the building includes any Mezzanine areas; if so include the square footage of any additional GFA on the cover sheet under the parking calculations text block. If additional square footage is applicable list the overall square footage in the building footprint on sheet four (4). ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) are provided. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 05. COMMENT: If applicable draw and label any existing or proposed easements on the site. Provide the information as noted by the standards above. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 06. COMMENT: Correctly depict, label and dimension the existing sidewalk along the Ironwood Hill Drive right of frontage. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 07. COMMENT: Currently there are individual developments on two properties that make up the new development site. It is acknowledged that the distance and bearings have been labeled for the overall site. However a Pima County Assessor's Tax Parcel Combo is required prior to approval of the Development Package. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 08. COMMENT: Label the zoning classifications across the streets from the subject property. The zoning classifications can be labeled on the overall site plan on the cover sheet or on sheet 4. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 09. COMMENT: The existing north driveway along the Silverbell Road has been identified on the site plan as being closed. The south driveway is to remain with some minimal changes. For location reference, draw and label the existing bus stop that is next to the south driveway entrance along Silverbell Road. Draw and label the extension of the sidewalk access ramps along the northwest boundary of the site. The future access ramps on either side of the north driveway for the existing and future sidewalks must be drawn and labeled. Refer to Engineering comments related to the Public street access ramp and sidewalk requirements. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 10. COMMENT: Demonstrate maneuverability in and out of the loading space. Label the width of the Drive area between the south curb and the striped island area next to the drive-through canopy. The width must be the minimum for a one way access. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 11. COMMENT: Provide dimensioned bicycle parking details for the long and short term facilities based on the proposed locations as depicted on the development package site plan. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 12. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed by zoning as it pertains to the zoning review purview. Once the DP site plan is approved the grading plan is also approved by zoning assuming the site plan sheet and grading plan sheets match. Ensure that any changes that are made to the base plan (site) are also made to the grading and landscape plan sheets. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 13. COMMENT: Zoning has reviewed the onsite pedestrian circulation for zoning compliance and ADA ANSI standards. The PDSD ADA plans examiner is out on medical leave and the Zoning Review Plans Reviewers have been asked to review the ADA site requirements. Until such time as deemed necessary zoning will be reviewing the onsite ADA requirements with the assistance of the Building Official. The sidewalk system meets the intent of the Technical standards as it applies to zoning. It appears that slope requirements for the accessible parking spaces and access aisles and sidewalks are within the slope requirements necessary for ADA compliance. On sheet five (5), label the running slope for the assessable sidewalk area located along the south parking lot area with the double row of parking bays. (Along the accessible route from the south driveway entrance.) Label the running slopes for all sidewalks adjacent to the building. Due to possible clarity, it may be necessary to label the running and cross slopes on the site plan sheet as well. The accessible route from the building to the trash enclosure must be defined on the site plan sheet. The site plan depicts truncated domes on all onsite access ramps. Per the revised ANSI standards truncated domes are not required on private property access ramps. The building official has asked that the on-site Truncated Domes be removed from the plan. The dollar amount fine, labeled on the detail drawing for the reserved parking sign must be revised to 590 dollars. Per the building official the 7 foot clearance must be to the bottom of the reserved sign or the bottom of the Van Accessible sign when it is used with the reserved sign. Revise note 3 under the sign detail drawing on sheet 7, or add an additional note to cover the required 7 foot clearance as determined by the building official. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 14. COMMENT: As part of the zoning review related to the pedestrian circulation zoning did a review related to the accessibility from the street to the building. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 15. COMMENT: Add a statement to keynote 20 on sheet 4 that the signs will be permitted under separate permit. ****************************************************************************************** 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 16. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to the Landscape buffers and screening and address as required. ****************************************************************************************** If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 06/23/2015 | DRIVERA1 | ADA | REVIEW | Reqs Change | See zoning comment 13 related to ADA. |
| 07/01/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | .DATE: July 09, 2015 DUE DATE: July 15, 2015 SUBJECT: CVS Development Package- Engineering Review TO: Rick Engineering; Attn: Tri Miller, PE LOCATION: 2385 N Silverbell Rd; T14S R13E Sec04 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0093 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Rick Engineering Co, 12JUN15), Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Rick Engineering Co, 12JUN15), and Geotechnical Engineering Report (Ninyo & Moore, 10JUN15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development package to provide the email addresses of the primary property owner and the developer on the development package documents. 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.B: Revise the development package and Title Block to include a brief legal description of the property. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: Revise the development package to provide the administrative street address adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Package case number (DP15-0093) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.4.C: Revise the development package and project-location map to correctly identify the Township Range and Section. Per the GIS map, Drainage Report and Geotechnical Report the correct Township is 14, revise. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.6.a: Revise the development package to include a note to show conformance with the Scenic Corridor Overlay requirements for the following items related to ENG review: i. Demonstrate compliance with UDC Article 5 Section 5.3.4.C.1-4: Provide the calculation for the driveway square footage to ensure that it does not exceed 20% of the buffer area. Verify that an area not larger than 18 square feet and not exceeding 30 inches in height per lot or parcel for the placement of utility transformers, pedestals, and service meters and hookups for utilities, this may include the existing infrastructure. ii. Demonstrate compliance with UDC Article 5 Section 5.3.4.D: Exposed cut or fill slopes shall be no greater than a one foot rise or fall over a three foot length. iii. Demonstrate compliance with UDC Article 5 Section 5.3.6: Label and dimension the view corridors on the development package to ensure compliance. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.C: Revise the development package to label all existing sidewalks within the right-of-way of Ironwood Hills Drive. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development package to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site with the Improvement Plan Number in plan view. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to clarify the location of the existing alleyway and the proposed driveway location on Ironwood Hills Dr. It is acknowledged that the alleyway is not currently used for vehicular access; however per the Tucson Access Management Guidelines (TAMG) Section 5.4.1 and Figure 3 the nearest pavement edges of the driveway entrance should be spaced 80-feet apart. Provide written approval from TDOT for placing the driveway as proposed. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label the required minimum 25-foot radii at the driveway entrance from Silverbell Road, per TSM Sec.10-01.3.2.C and Figure 6. The proposed plan set shows a new right turn lane that will be reviewed and approved under the submitted PIA plan; however the 25-foot curb returns are still required along MS&R streets. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label and dimension the required handicap access ramps along the northwest driveway within the public right-of-way. As proposed the new sidewalk that is to be constructed must have an access ramp to the proposed concrete header of the road. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development package to label the existing bus stop along Silverbell Road adjacent to the closed off driveway. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development package to provide a standard vehicle parking space detail as per Keynote #11. Refer to UDC Figure 7.4.6-C for all dimensions and the required 2.5 foot overhang dimension. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.a: Revise the development package to dimension width of the drive area between the south curb and the striped island area next to the drive-through canopy for one-way access. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.c: Revise the development package to label and dimension the maneuverability for the proposed loading zone. Refer to the Design Vehicle Dimension Table from AASHTO Geometric Design of Highway and Streets for minimum inside and outside dimensions for vehicle types. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from the Zoning Reviewer for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to label and dimension all sidewalk widths onsite to ensure the minimum 4-foot clear width per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A. Specifically adjacent to the long term parking spaces along the north side of the building and at the northwest corner of the building adjacent to the loading space. 18) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to provide a pedestrian access path to all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B the areas within the development which must be connected specifically verify how the pedestrian access is connected to the proposed refuse containers. 19) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.N.3: Revise the development package to provide the ADOT details as referenced in the Keynotes on Sheet 5 of 21. Since the details that are not referenced are not PC/COT Standard Details for Public Improvements they must be provided on the plan set for construction purposes. 20) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. Provide specific details on the development package for construction purposes. The details must match TSM Sec.8-01, Figure 2 and Figure 3a for the required double enclosure walls with gates, concrete thickness and compressive strength, concrete approach apron dimensions, space from wall to bollards, anchoring bolts, 14'x40' clear approach for each container, etc. Provide specific details on the development package for construction purposes. The Keynote Note references the architectural plans which are not used for site construction. SWPPP: 21) The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES 2013 Construction General Permit (CGP). The SWPPP was previously reviewed and approved under the 2 demolition permits that have been issued for the demolition of the 2 buildings. All SWPPP controls must be in place prior to the start of demolition. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/06/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/06/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. SCENIC CORRIDOR ZONE (SCZ) Re-vegetation of Site Any portion of the Scenic Route buffer area and the MS&R right-of-way disturbed by development activity shall be re-vegetated with native vegetation. Opuntia ficus-indica and Dasylirion acrotriche are not native species. Revise plant selection to meet code requirements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 07/14/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/22/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |