Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0076
Parcel: 11006166A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP15-0076
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/27/2017 ARUIZ1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/07/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields - Principal Planner
PDSD Zoning Review Section

PROJECT: DP15-0076 (Rezoning C9-14-04 R-1 to R-2)
4208 East Monte Vista
FLD tentative plat R-2

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 8, 2017

DUE DATE: March 28, 2017

1. Not addressed. Follow Up to Previous Comment 6: The revised note 11 is acknowledged. The previous comment will remain until a decision has been made by the PDSD Director. If the decision is made with conditions, include the conditions in general note 11. Previous Comment 6: 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - If an administrative reduction for the required street perimeter yard is approved, see comment 11, provide general note stating "ADMINISTRATIVE REDUCED STREET PERIMETER YARD SETBACKS APPROVED, DATE ??/??/????".

2. It does not appear that street perimeter yard setbacks are met for the main building and/or the garage;
Main building street perimeter yard setbacks:
Based on 'A' elevations Axonometric the required street perimeter setbacks would be 24'-5"
Based on 'B' elevations Axonometric the required street perimeter setbacks would be 24'-6"
Garage street perimeter yard setbacks base on an ADT of 140 - 1,000, see UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2.B.(1).
This comment was not addressed. Provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension from nearest edge of travel to the parking structure. The building setbacks for the garage and driveway are based on and ADT of 140 - 1,000. The required and proposed building setbacks for garages shall be listed and labeled on the site plan sheet. See UDC article 6 section 6.4.5.C.2 Figure 6.4.5-E. Previous Comment 11: 2-06.5.3 This comment was not addressed correctly. The setbacks to the private street should meet the requirement of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2. However review UDC Article 8.7.3.L.2 and request an administrative reduction for the required street perimeter yard. COMMENT: The minimum setback for a developing area is the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height for streets with an ADT over 140 (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2). The minimum driveway length is nineteen (19) feet from the back edge of the sidewalk and eighteen (18) feet from the property line to the front of the garage (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2.b(1)(a)(b)). The ADT for thirty (30) single-family residences is three hundred (300) (TSM 10-01.2.2.A).

3. The provided elevations do not provide the correct dimensions to determine building height. Per UDC Article 6.4.4.B.1 Building height is the vertical distance measured from the design grade elevation to the highest point of a flat roof; to the deck line of a mansard roof; or to the middle (between the eave and ridge) of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof, except as follows: (See Figure 6.4.4-A, Measurement of Building Height.). For future clarification a pitched roof is any room with a slope greater than ΒΌ" in a foot. Previous Comment 12: 2-06.5.3.D - Per rezoning condition 8 the allowed height is limited to 20'. Based on the provided elevations the buildings area exceeding the 20' height, see UDC Article 6.4.4.B.1.

4. The response letter states that the gate at Glenn has been removed but it is still shown on the plan, clarify. The gated entry at the Glenn Street entrance does not appear to provide sufficient area for vehicle maneuverability. Refer to Access Management Guidelines section 5.11 and see engineering comments related to this item. Approval through TDOT and possibly a TSMR may be required. As the Glenn access gate has not been removed from the plan this comment remains. It does not appear that rezoning condition 18 has been addressed. This item shall be addressed for current and future conditions.

5. 2-06.4.9.R - With the proposed street cross section it is not clear the accessibility requirements are met at the back to back driveways for the short sidewalk sections in between the driveways.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

David Rivera can be reached on Tuesday or Wednesday from 8 to 5, T. 837-4957 or email David.Rivera@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
03/07/2017 KLEE1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved DATE: 3/6/16
FROM: Rick Gonzalez, Architect, City of Tucson On-Call Design Professional
TO: Kelly Lee, Planning and Development Services Department
RE: Design Professional review comments for Flexible Lot Development Review
DP15-0076 Cornerstone Homes/4208 Monte Vista/4th Submittal per design Criteria of UDC Section 8.7.3 M

The plans and documents submitted to PDSD as Submittal 4 appear to meet the minimum standards required by UDC Section 8.7.3 M. The Design professional recommending approval of this project.
The review is based upon Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 8.7.3 M
03/07/2017 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change Cornerstone Homes on Monte Vista (DP15-0076)
The developer has asked for reduced street perimeter yard setback per UDC 8.7.3.L.2. In order for reduced setback to enhance the architectural design of the vehicular circulation of the Cornerstone Homes on Monte Vista FLD the following items shall be provided:

1) Although the design professional has approved the model elevations the PDSD director would like to see more variation to include but not limited to more colors, accent colors, different garage doors or roof materials.
Once the tentative plat is revised and the additional information provided, the reduced street perimeter yard setback will be granted on the condition that:
The garage setback is no more than 8 feet from front of curb.
03/08/2017 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Reqs Change See Zoning comments
03/17/2017 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: March 17, 2017
DUE DATE: March 28, 2017
SUBJECT: Tentative Plat
TO: Erin Harris, PE
LOCATION: 4208 E Monte Vista
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0076
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per previous comment 1 keynote 11 is called out over a 12" deep retention area that is required per UDC 7.14.3. It refers the reader to the landscape plans which refers to the same area as a 6" maximum depth water harvesting area. Please update the landscape plans to include the required retention detail. Update the drainage report if appropriate.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
03/24/2017 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change The revised private sewer layout shows lots 18 and 19 still requiring backwater valves based on the rim elevation of the upstream cleanout (2433.55') and the minimum FFE for each of these lots (2433.68' and 2433.72' respectively). Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.
03/27/2017 KLEE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:
1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) All approved documents submitted previously
3) A disk containing all items submitted
4) All items requested by review staff
5) All items needed to approve these plans

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
12/22/2017 KROBLES1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed