Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0076
Parcel: 11006166A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP15-0076
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
02/17/2016 EGALLET1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
02/18/2016 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Reqs Change 1. A separate permit with the City of Tucson is required for the installation of a private sewer collection system. Verify that Pima County Department of Environmental Quality will allow the use of sewer branches smaller than 8" in the private sewer collection system. [Initial comment: Contrary to the note on sheet 6 of 12, the total flow for the private sewage collection system for this project is in excess of 3000 gallons per day. In addition, the system includes private manholes. The design for the system must be submitted to the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for their approval prior to obtaining a permit for constructing the sewage collection system from the City of Tucson. Reference A. R. S. 49-104 (B) (13).]
2. Lots 1 through 8 and lots 27 and 28 appear to still require backwater valves but lot 20 does not appear to require the installation of a backwater valve. [Initial comment: Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Identify the buildings that will require the installation of a backwater valve. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.]
02/19/2016 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved The above project has been “approved” by Pima County Addressing on 02/18/16.
02/24/2016 PAUL BAUGHMAN ENGINEERING REVIEW Reqs Change DATE: February 24, 2016
DUE DATE: March 1, 2016
SUBJECT: Tentative Plat
TO: Erin Harris, PE
LOCATION: 4208 E Monte Vista
REVIEWERS: Paul Baughman, PE, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP15-0076
SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning and Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. The following items need to be addressed:
1) Per previous comments 2, 12 and 21 and AM Section 2-06.4.2C Revise the development plan to call out all common areas individually as to their specific purpose (ie. Common Area "A" detention/retention basin swale, drainage infrastructure, private roadway, functional open space, ect.
2) Per previous comments 26 and 36 and AM2-06.4.9N1 and Section 1.4 of the Pima County/City of Tucson Detention/Retention Manual Individual lot-storage systems within single-family residential developments are not acceptable for meeting the detention/retention criteria of either Pima County or the City of Tucson. Sheets 2 and 12 shows lot lines that include individual lot-storage systems (Keynote 11 on sheet 3 shows a 9" deep water harvesting area) within single-family residential lots.
3) Per previous comment 34 please provide additional information regarding maintenance of drainage swales which should be placed in common areas.
4) Per previous comment 28 there is a need to call out additional details for rip rap including size and filter fabric or grouting/ mortar. Please provide this detail per comment response letter and AM 2-06.4.9.N.3
5) Per previous comment 37 and section 3.5.1, item 5 the geotechnical report does not address infiltration rates of the drainage basins as required.
6) New comment. The finished floor elevations need to be elevated 2 feet above the highest adjacent grade due to the locally regulated flood hazard where FEMA maps show a Zone X -100 year flood plain. Per a review of FEMA Map Panel 1644 K where this area was previously mapped into the AE zone, and using a vertical conversion of 2.17 the flood depth indicate a need for the full 2 feet of elevation above the highest adjacent grade. - Per April 6, 2016 phone conversation with Chris Rod at JE Fuller a Flo-2D model may be run to provide new best available data and the report may be submitted as a separate addendum to the Drainage Report. Both the Original Drainage Report and the Addendum should be provided in PDF on the disk submitted with the resubmittal.
If you have any comments questions or wish to discuss new information, please call or email me at 520-837-5007 or paul.baughman@tucsonaz.gov.
03/03/2016 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Approved Office of the Pima County Assessor
240 N STONE AVENUE
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR



TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)



FROM: Julieann Arechederra
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor’s Office


DATE: March 2, 2016


RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding:
CORNERSTONE HOMES ON MONTE VISTA TENTATIVE DP15-076




* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

X Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements.
_______ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements.

COMMENTS:





NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
03/10/2016 ARUIZ1 COT NON-DSD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Approved Trish,

The City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department (ES) has completed our review of the tentative plat for the Cornerstone Homes proposed residential subdivision to be located between Monte Vista Drive and Glenn Street in Tucson. The proposal includes the development of 28 single family residential lots and one private street providing access to the residential lots.

The Cornerstone Homes residential subdivision is located within the service area for solid waste collection by the City of Tucson - ES. Access is provided from Monte Vista Drive on the north side of the subdivision and from Glenn Street on the south side of the subdivision for collection of refuse and recycling containers.

As specified on Note No.7 in the Building Plan Notes on Sheet 1 of 12 of the Development Package plans, the containers (refuse and recycling) shall be rolled to the private street, placed behind the curb and rolled back to the residence on the collection day.

Based on this review, ES approves the tentative plat for the Cornerstone Homes on Monte Vista from a solid waste storage and collection standpoint.

Please let me know if you have any questions concerning this review.

Thomas G. Ryan, P. E.

City of Tucson - Environmental Services Department
03/10/2016 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change UDC 7.6.4.B.1.a.1. The canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space must be located within 40 feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk).
03/14/2016 SSHIELD1 ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
03/14/2016 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP15-0076 (Rezoning C9-14-04 R-1 to R-2)
4208 East Monte Vista
FLD tentative plat R-2

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 14, 2016

DUE DATE: March 16, 2016

1. 2-06.3.12 - The drawing index does not match the sheets provided.

2. 2-06.4.2 - The title block on sheets L-1, L-2, L-3 & N-1 is not readable.

3. 2-06.4.3 - Provide the development package case number, DP15-0076, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. This includes the landscape and NPPO sheets.

4. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - Provide the rezoning case number, C9-14-04, adjacent to the title block on all sheets. This includes the landscape and NPPO sheets.

5. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - As a Technical Standards Modification Request (TSMR) is required, see comments 7 & 8, provide the TSMR case number adjacent to the title block on all sheets and provide a general note stating the TSMR case number, date of approval, what was modified, and if applicable list all conditions of approval.

6. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - If an administrative reduction for the required street perimeter yard is approved, see comment 11, provide general note stating "ADMINISTRATIVE REDUCED STREET PERIMETER YARD SETBACKS APPROVED, DATE ??/??/????".

7. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - The proposed private street does not match a typical cross section in TSM Section 10. A Technical Standards Modification Request will need to be approved for the modification prior to approval of the development package.

8. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - The proposed visitors parking shown backing out into the street does not match a typical cross section in TSM Section 10. A Technical Standards Modification Request will need to be approved for the modification prior to approval of the development package.

9. 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Sheet 3 the street cross section calls out "E" sheet 3, there is no "E" on sheet 3.

10. 2-06.4.9.L As portions of the proposed street sidewalks are located on private property some type of easement or verbiage is needed in the CC&Rs to allow access.

11. 2-06.5.3 This comment was not addressed correctly. The setbacks to the private street should meet the requirement of UDC Article 6.4.5.C.2. However review UDC Article 8.7.3.L.2 and request an administrative reduction for the required street perimeter yard. COMMENT: The minimum setback for a developing area is the greater of twenty-one (21) feet or the height for streets with a ADT over 140 (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2). The minimum driveway length is nineteen (19) feet from the back edge of the sidewalk and eighteen (18) feet from the property line to the front of the garage (UDC Section 6.4.5.C.2.b(1)(a)(b)). The ADT for thirty (30) single-family residences is three hundred (300) (TSM 10-01.2.2.A).

12. 2-06.5.3.D - Per rezoning condition 8 the allowed height is limited to 20'. Based on the provided elevations the buildings area exceeding the 20' height, see UDC Article 6.4.4.B.1.


If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents.
03/14/2016 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
03/15/2016 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets fo the plans
2) All items requested by review staff
3) All items needed to approve these plans
03/15/2016 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/15/2016 FDILLON1 DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW Approved DESIGN PROFESSIONAL
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE DIRECTOR

PROJECT: COT DP15-0076
CORNERSTONE HOMES ON
MONTE VISTA
DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW
This project has been selected for review by Rick Gonzalez, Architect (RGA), a contracted Design Professional for the City of Tucson (COT). RGA has conducted a Flexible Lot Development Design Criteria Review report #2 for compliance with the Unified Development Code on behalf of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) Director, Planning Administrator (PA), and Principle Planner (PP), Frank Dillon, has determined the AVP, PMP, and tentative plat generally meets compliance with the FLD zoning option.
It is recommended the applicant include the Design Professional's communications with the development package.
RGA will forward this letter of recommendation of compliance to the COT PDSD Director, PA, and PP. The PDSD Director shall make the final decision on the project's compliance with FLD design Criteria for this development (UDC 8.7.3.M).
END OF 2ND FLD REVIEW, DESIGN PROFESSIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS
Sincerely,
Rick Gonzalez, Architect
COT Design Professional

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/10/2017 LBOJORQ1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed