Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0073
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/08/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0073 Address: 8750 E Woodland Drive Development Package: Commercial Stables Use, Single Family Residence, Pecan Farm (non- Conforming Site per Zoning Administrator letter dated April 29, 2015. TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 8, 2015 DUE DATE: July 1, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 30, 2016. 2. Follow up to previous comment 4: The is project is required to go through a Board of adjustment review and approval process for the lot size and per your response to comment to previous comment 7, a board of adjustment variance for the pavement requirements for the vehicular use areas. List the B of A case number in the lower right corner next to the title block. Also list as a general note the B of A case, date of approval and conditions of approval. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Previous Comment 04: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP15-0073. List the case number and admin address next to the title block on plan sheets. If any other review and approval process is required prior to approval of the DP, ensure that the case number type of review and approval, date of approval and conditions of approval are listed as a general note. The case number shall also be listed next to the title block on all plan sheets. ********************************************************************* 3. Follow up to previous comment 13: It is acknowledged that the applicant will be seeking a Board of Adjustment Variance for the surfacing materials related to the vehicular use areas (drives). This comment will remain until the B of A process has been completed and approval of the request is granted, if applicable. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous Comment 13: No vehicle parking is required for the Commercial Stables is required, but if they are provided the spaces must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on the plan. The parking will have to meet the minimum parking lot design requirements as well as any surface materials and striping. Any drives or PAALs must be paved per article & section 7.4.6.I. The residential use must be provided with a minimum of two parking spaces. Drawn and label the required spaces for the residential use. ********************************************************************* If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 06/23/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: June 23, 2015 DUE DATE: July 01, 2015 SUBJECT: Platosa LLC Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Robert Page, RA LOCATION: 8750 E Woodland Road REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0073 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) Complied. 2) Complied. 3) Board of Adjustment Required: AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6.a: Revise the development package to add all applicable overlay case numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. Per the application it appears that the applicant is requesting a Board of Adjustment Variance to either modify or eliminate specific UDC requirements. As a General Note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meetings the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Board of Adjustment Required: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.5.c: Revise the development package and the vehicular use area to meet the minimum surfacing requirements of UDC Sec.7.4.6.I (the only Exemption under this Section is for vehicle storage). It is acknowledged that a Board of Adjustment Variance will be requested to eliminate this requirement. Allowable surfacing requirements consist of 1 of the following materials: 1. Pervious and impervious asphaltic concrete; or, 2. Pervious and impervious cement concrete; or, 3. A penetration treatment of bituminous material and seal coat of bituminous binder and mineral aggregate; or, 4. Alternative surfacing as determined appropriate by the PDSD City Engineer, provide written approval. 8) Complied. 9) Board of Adjustment Required: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to provide a pedestrian access path from the existing buildings to Woodland Rd. Per TSM Sec.7-01.3.3.A a path must connect all public access areas of the development and the pedestrian circulation path located in any adjacent streets. 10) Board of Adjustment Required: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to provide a pedestrian access path to all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B the areas within the development which must be connected throughout the development. 11) Board of Adjustment Required: AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development package to clearly dimension all onsite sidewalks to ensure the minimum 4-foot width requirements per TSM Sec.7-01.4.3.A. 12) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the Board of Adjustment approval and revise the Development Package to list all conditions of approval. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is April 30, 2016. 2. Follow up to previous comment 4: The is project is required to go through a Board of adjustment review and approval process for the lot size and per your response to comment to previous comment 7, a board of adjustment variance for the pavement requirements for the vehicular use areas. List the B of A case number in the lower right corner next to the title block. Also list as a general note the B of A case, date of approval and conditions of approval. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Previous Comment 04: This project has been assigned the PDSD case number DP15-0073. List the case number and admin address next to the title block on plan sheets. If any other review and approval process is required prior to approval of the DP, ensure that the case number type of review and approval, date of approval and conditions of approval are listed as a general note. The case number shall also be listed next to the title block on all plan sheets. ********************************************************************* 3. Follow up to previous comment 13: It is acknowledged that the applicant will be seeking a Board of Adjustment Variance for the surfacing materials related to the vehicular use areas (drives). This comment will remain until the B of A process has been completed and approval of the request is granted, if applicable. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. Previous Comment 13: No vehicle parking is required for the Commercial Stables is required, but if they are provided the spaces must be drawn, labeled and dimensioned on the plan. The parking will have to meet the minimum parking lot design requirements as well as any surface materials and striping. Any drives or PAALs must be paved per article & section 7.4.6.I. The residential use must be provided with a minimum of two parking spaces. Drawn and label the required spaces for the residential use. ********************************************************************* If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 06/25/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The following comments apply: ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Per Case # T15SA00137 Zoning Administration letter. This site is considered to be for minimum lot size for the commercial use as well as the development standards associated with the existing uses but not limited to landscaping, screening and surfacing. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 10/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |