Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP15-0055
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2015 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/07/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/10/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: April 9, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP15-0055 TENTATIVE PLAT PACKAGE FOR PARK MODERN _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0, AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. " OWNERSHIP OF PARCELS VARY. OUR RECORDS INDICATE THE OWNERS AS FOLLOWS: 113-08-2620 - DP DIVERSIFIED INVESTMENTS LLC 113-08-263A - GEORGE A. REITZ 113-08-263B - GEORGE A. REITZ 113-08-2640 - STITELER PARTNERS LLC 113-08-265A - STITELER PARTNERS LLC 113-08-2660 - STITELER PARTNERS LLC 113-08-2670 - STITELER PARTNERS LLC 113-08-268C - STITELER PARTNERS LLC NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 04/10/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 04/13/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its acceptance. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 04/14/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | ADD "NO PARKING FIRE LANE" SIGNS ON ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS. SIGNS MUST MEET CITY STANDARDS. |
| 04/16/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See documents in PRO April 16, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Park Modern (lots 1-37 + Common Areas "A"-"D") Tentative Plat RCP CDRC No. DP15-0055 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, gas mains are located within the rights-of-way of Tyndall Avenue, Blacklidge Drive, Hedrick Drive, and Park Avenue for future extension into the proposed development. Also, there are several gas services inside the properties adjacent to the area of development. SWG recommends the following verbiage be added to the dedication notes on the cover sheet: I THE UNDERSIGNED, HEREBY WARRANT THAT I AM ALL AND THE ONLY PARTY HAVING ANY RECORD TITLE INTEREST IN THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND I CONSENT TO THE SUBDIVISION OF SAID LAND IN THE MANNER SHOWN HEREON. I HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHOWN HEREON, INCLUDING ALL PUBLIC STREETS AND EASEMENTS. UTILITY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HEREON ARE DEDICATED FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES. EXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR TOWN USES AS SHOWN HEREON ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE TOWN OF MARANA. I THE UNDERSIGNED, MY SUCCESSORS… PRIVATE COMMON AREA, AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE RESERVED FOR THE PRIVATE USE AND CONVENIENCE OF ALL OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN THIS SUBDIVISION, THEIR GUESTS AND INVITES AND FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE UTILITIES. TITLE TO THE LAND… All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please include SWG in all future plat and development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6194 or ben.delosmonteros@swgas.com. Sincerely, Ben De Los Monteros Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf) |
| 04/20/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 ROBIN FREIMAN ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: ROBIN FREIMAN, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP15-0055 TENTATIVE PLAT FOR PARK MODERN DATE: APRIL 20, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. All Sheets: Remove "AND A PORTION OF BLOCK 8" from the legal description as this project is located only within a portion of Block 5. 2. All Sheets: Define Common Areas in the title block (A=Private Streets, etc.) 3. Sheet 1 and Sheet 3: Add labels to clearly mark all areas of Common Area "D" (along the west side of lots 18, 19, 28, & 29, between lots 5 & 6, between lots 14 & 15, and any other areas that are Common Area "D") |
| 04/20/2015 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Please see the Design Professional comments regarding the Architectural Variation Plan below: PROJECT: COT FLD DP15-0055 April 20, 2015 PARK MODERN 3016 N TYNDALL AVE FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT DESIGN PROFESSIONAL REVIEW This project has been selected for review by Rick Gonzalez, Architect (RGA), a contracted Design Professional for the City of Tucson (COT). RGA has conducted a Flexible Lot Development Design Criteria Review report #1 for compliance with the Unified Development Code on behalf of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD) Director, Ernie Duarte, Planning Administrator (PA), Jim Mazzocco, and Lead Planner (LP), Frank Dillon. This letter contains recommendations and modifications to be addressed by written responses indicating any actions taken. In order to facilitate a shorter 2nd review, provide all indicated responses and revisions to the plans. Please return revised plans and response letter to the COT PDSD in accordance with their submittal requirements. To avoid delays, ensure that all responses are made and are complete, and have been coordinated on all applicable details and note sheets. When the plans are found to be in accordance with the UDC FLD recommendations and modifications listed below, RGA will forward a letter of recommendation of compliance to the COT PDSD Director and PA, and PP. The PDSD shall make the final decision on the project’s compliance with FLD design Criteria for this development (UDC 8.7.3.M). GENERAL NOTE: Standard Text - Indicates excerpts or edited excepts from the FLD or UDC for reference and clarity. italicized Bold - Indicates Design Professional’s Comments 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS: M. Design Criteria 1. Architectural Variation d. Architectural Variation Plan Required (5) Conditions of the approved AVP shall be included as notes on the approved plat or site plan, whichever applies, and the building plan. Comment 1: AV requirements appear to have been adequately met, however, please indicate on the conditions of the approved AVP will be included as notes of one of the approved plans called out on Criteria M.1.d.(5). 2. Transition Edge Treatment and Mitigation for Adjacent Properties b. Privacy Mitigation (1) Applicability Privacy mitigation as required by this section is required when multistory residences are proposed adjacent to existing single story residences and the existing residences are zoned R-2 or more restrictive. Comment 2: TET requirements appear to have been adequately met. However, in regard to privacy mitigation, Please provide evidence that adjacent R-2 properties are greater than one story for compliance with FLD Criteria M.2.b.(1); or if adjacent lots are one story, show compliance with privacy mitigation requirements. b. Privacy Mitigation (2) Prohibited Improvements …. windows (except for clerestory and translucent windows), … that overlook the rear and side yards of an adjacent residence are prohibited. Comment 3: Please provide information showing windows overlooking adjacent residences are clearstory or translucent. (3) Privacy Mitigation Plan A Privacy Mitigation Plan (PMP) is required demonstrating compliance with this section. Comment 4: Please provide a PMP, show compliance with FLD M.2.b.(2) and (3) referenced above. (a) PMPs shall be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.5.3.F, Privacy Mitigation Plan, of the Administrative Manual. 2-06.5.3.F. Privacy Mitigation Plan The provided privacy mitigation plan in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC must show the following: Comment 5.1-3: 1. Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation; 2. Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent One story properties, if any, provide documentation of the existing conditions. 3. Expand on your written statement and drawings (with your given AVA and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include, when practicable, additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; (b) PMPs shall demonstrate that adequate measures, such as screening, setbacks, building mass, solar access, air circulation, and light access are incorporated into the design of the project to preserve the existing residents’ privacy. Comment 6: While indicated screening, setbacks, and landscaping go a long to maintain existing residents privacy, further siting angle sketches should also be provided regarding views from second story windows onto existing single story residences, if any, to insure privacy mitigation. (f) Conditions of the approved PMP, including a description of the required mitigation and for which units the mitigation applies, shall be included as notes on the plat or site plan, whichever applies, and the building plan. |
| 04/21/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0055 3016 N. Tyndall Avenue Tentative Plat - Lots 1-37 and Common Areas A -D TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 22, 2015 DUE DATE: April 4, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 21, 2016. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 01. COMMENT: Two copies of sheet eight (8) were included in both sets of the Development package. Remove one of the duplicate sheets 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 02. COMMENT: List on the cover sheet the email addresses for the Architect and Landscape Architect. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. If the subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), a condominium, or a similar type of residential subdivision utilizing special provisions of the UDC, it shall be so noted; 03. COMMENT: Add a note to the title block of all plan sheets that this is a Flexible Lot Development. Label the type of common areas, i.e., private streets, drives, open spaces etc. 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 04. COMMENT: As noted in Comment 1, there was an extra sheet 8 attached to the plan sets. Remove the extra copy. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 05. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the DP case number DP15-0055; list the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets including all landscape sheets. If during the review process it is found that additional processes are required, all application case numbers, dates of approval and conditions of approval will have to be listed on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 06. COMMENT: It is not clear that the location map covers the required one mile area. Label Glenn Street and Mountain Avenue. 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 07. COMMENT: If the Location map is updated and if applicable, label the section corners as required. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 08. COMMENT: This development is to be constructed over land that is zoned R-1 and R-3. Revise General Note 3 to include the R-2 zone. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 09. COMMENT: Revise general note 4 to state the proposed use which should be identified as attached and detached single family residential, utilizing the Flexible Lot Development Option. List the applicable use specific standard "All; 8.7.3" that applies in both the R-2 and R-3 zones and whether and what Development Alternative is being used in each zone. (Remove the proposed use as listed in general note 4, it does not apply in and FLD development.) 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 10. COMMENT: List as a general note the number of lots proposed as well as the common areas, i.e., Lots 1-37 and Common areas A-C (Private Streets/Drives etc.) Common Area D (Open Space, Detention basin etc.) 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; re-zonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 11. COMMENT: A Flexible Lot Development Option is an Overlay and is subject to additional development criteria that must be addressed and incorporated into the development plan. In some cases the FLD is reviewed by the PDSD Design Professional for such items as privacy mitigation. If this is the case for this project additional comments may be forthcoming from the DP and must be addressed and noted on the plans. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 12. COMMENT: If during the Design Professionals review, he finds that mitigation is required specific lots may be required to comply with any conditions. If so, list the lot numbers affected by such requirements. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 13. COMMENT: Same as comment 9 above. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.3.b - "Total miles of new private streets is ____________." 14. COMMENT: Add as a general note the total miles of private streets. 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 15. COMMENT: Provide on either the cover sheet context map or on sheet 3 existing conditions that are within 50 feet of the eastern boundary of the proposed development; specifically the building footprints of the existing building along the eastern boundary of the proposed development. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 16. COMMENT: Adjust the thickness of the property lines to make them more visible. 2-06.4.9.C - If the project has common areas, label each common area individually with a separate letter designation. Enclose with a solid line each common area, private street, etc., that will have separate restrictions, a separate homeowners' association, or any common area that is separated by a public right-of-way. 17. COMMENT: Annotate the use of the common areas, Street, open space, landscape etc. Also label the areas between the dwellings. It is not clear what the use or purposes of these rectangular areas are, as they are not annotated with a key note or listed in the legend. (I assume they will be for water harvesting?) 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 18. COMMENT: The proposed street cross section does not match any acceptable street cross sections or the closest Cross Section for a 0-1000 ADT roadway in the Technical Standards Section 10-1. A TSMR will be required for the proposed private street which includes, proposed header curb and no sidewalks within the roadway area, and the proposed one way street. The potential for a turnaround for the two dead end streets may also have to be approved through a TSMR. See the PDSD Engineering and Fire Plans review comments. The cross section detail drawing on sheet 5 should be labeled as Common Area "A" private street or Access Lane etc. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 19. COMMENT: Refer to comments if any, from the Fire Department Plans reviewer related to the potential fire access issues. 2-06.4.9.H.7 - If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Technical Standards Manual Section 10-01.0.0. Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked. 20. COMMENT: Label the width and length of the on-street visitor parking spaces. There appears to be two different lengths. Add as a detail or label the on-street parallel parking space dimensions on sheet three. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 21. COMMENT: Park Avenue is listed as a Collector street on the MS&R plan. The maximum R of W width is to be 64 feet. Currently it appears to be 60 feet in width. Additional dedication of R of Way will be required as part of the final Plat Process. (Inquire with TDOT with regards to this standard.) 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 22. COMMENT: If the additional land is to be dedicated for the right of way, remove the future site detail drawing on sheet 6 and revise the plans to include the future right of way conditions including building setbacks, sidewalks, landscaping and sight visibility triangles. Correctly identify the future curb, sidewalks, and SVT. The street building setback along Park Avenue should be labeled based on the future back of curb location which has not been identified on sheet 3. 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 23. COMMENT: Refer to Waste Water Plans reviewer comments for any easement requirements related to the on-site sewer and manholes. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 24. COMMENT: The grading plan has been reviewed for compliance as it applies the Zoning review purview of the grading plan. Once the DP site plan is approved by zoning the Grading plan is also considered approved. However, any changes that are necessary or made to the DP site plan sheet must also be made to the grading plan sheet. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 25. COMMENT: Include dimensioned detail drawings of typical lot layouts. The detail drawings shall include the building setbacks between the interior property lines and where adjacent to streets. More than one typical detail drawing may be required in order to provide the necessary building setback information. The interior street setbacks are based on the adt of each internal street. See UDC Article 6 section 6.4.5 table 6.4.5.C-1 for the correct street setbacks. Per the proposed design, all the buildings do not meet the minimum building setbacks. Board of Adjustment variances will be required. (See Comment 32 for a follow up on the interior street setback requirement.) 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 26. COMMENT: As noted in comment 18, the proposed interior street design does not match any of the cross sections in the Technical standards design. The location of the pedestrian circulation appears to be a viable location option that provides the circulation but will have to be approved per a TSMR. Demonstrate pedestrian circulation to the dumpster locations. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 27. COMMENT: The exterior street corners have not been designed with Accessible ramps. See related PDSD Engineering and TDOT comments. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 28. COMMENT: Indicate by note or detail drawing if postal service is proposed via Gang mailboxes or individual mail boxes to each unit. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 29. COMMENT: See the landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening. 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.2 Tentative Plat Required An FLD proposing to subdivide the project site into two or more lots must prepare a tentative plat. Tentative plats for FLDs must be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information, and the following developable area information: 2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and, 30. COMMENT: On the cover sheet list the developable area based on the remaining land area after the required dedication. 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 31. COMMENT: Provide the required information as noted above. The Table on the cover sheet can be revised to include this information. 2-06.5.3 Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 2-06.5.3. A. Reduced Perimeter Yards Street perimeter yards along interior street rights-of-way and perimeter yards between interior lots may be modified in accordance with Section 8.7.3.L, Perimeter Yards on Interior Lots, of the UDC. Applicants requesting a perimeter yard reduction must indicate what the required and reduced perimeter yards are and their locations. Applicants requesting a reduced street perimeter yard must provide a written description of how the reduced yard will enhance the architectural design or the vehicular circulation in the FLD and submit a transportation statement, or if required by the Department of Transportation, a traffic impact analysis; 32. COMMENT: Currently there is no Cross Section for an Access Lane in the Technical standards or the UDC that provides access to private property as depicted on the DP. The typical street building setback within a new subdivision is based on the ADT. In this proposed development there are three interior roadways with ADT from 0 to 1000 based on 10 trips per SFR. The minimum street building setback requirement varies as noted in Table 6.5.4.C-1. As noted in comment 25 the street building setbacks cannot be met based on the design of the subdivision. However per Article 8 section 8.7.3.L.2 the street may be administratively reduced by the PDSD Director. Review section 8.7.3.L.2 for more info on the reduced street building setback. 2-06.5.3.B - Maximum Density Option Applicants requesting a Maximum Density Option in accordance with Section 8.7.3.C.3.b must demonstrate compliance with the applicable criteria by written report or on the plat or site plan, whichever is appropriate; 33. COMMENT: As noted in comment 9, the FLD the development Alternative must be listed in comment 9 and should also be clear in the Density information text block on the cover sheet. The density text block should include the Development Alternative "A" or "B" used. 2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations; 34. COMMENT: Clearly label the required Functional Open Space and include a calculation of the required and proposed square footage of the open space area(s). Indicate the type of functional open space that is to be provided, passive recreation etc. The FLD shall provide functional open space amenities appropriate for the mix of residents for which the FLD project is designed. 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows: 35. COMMENT: If applicable provide the necessary mitigation plan. See the design professional's comments. 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation; 36. COMMENT: If applicable label the lots that must be designed to mitigate any privacy issues. 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 37. COMMENT: If available submit copies CC&R's with the next submittal. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. 38. COMMENT: These requirements shall be included or covered in the CC&R's unless a separate document is to be recorded 39. COMMENT: See the design professional's review comments related to the FLD and address them as required. 40. COMMENT: additional comments may be forthcoming based on the changes or other required processes due to deficiencies in design, such as B of A variances, TSMR, FLD Compliance etc. List any additional process application case numbers in the lower right corner of all plan sheets, List as a general note the case number, date of approval and any conditions of that approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 04/23/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | April 23, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0055 PROJECT NAME: Tentative Plat for Park Modern PROJECT ADDRESS: 3016 North Tyndall PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required TDOT does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Along Park Avenue (MS&R) 6 foot sidewalk is required. 2. Ensure that all existing signs that are affected by the off-site improvements and are applicable to the roadway remain in place or relocated to an appropriate location. If damaged or unsuitable for reuse then replace with new sign and/or post. 3. Provide standard pedestrian ramps at corners where sidewalk is provided. Park at Blacklidge, Hedrick at Tyndall, and Hedrick at Tyndall. 4. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/28/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approv-Cond | SUBJECT: PARK MODERN TENTATIVE PLAT DP15-0055 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat for Park Modern submitted April 8, 2015. TEP is unable to approve the plat at this time. The title block states “A portion of Block 5 and a portion of Block 8 of “Garden Homes Annex”….. The boundaries of the plat are within Block 5 only; please remove the reference to Block 8. If you have any questions, please contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 04/29/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: April 29, 2015 SUBJECT: Park Modern Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Metro TED; Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 3016 N Tyndall Avenue REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0055 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Report (Cypress Civil Development, 17MAR15) and Geotechnical Evaluation (Wright Engineers, 19FEB15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Unified Development Code (UDC), Administration Manual (AM) and Technical Standards Manual (TSM). Refer to the following link for further clarification: http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) AM Sec.2-06.4.1: Revise the development plan package to provide the email address and phone number for both the Architect and Landscape Architect under the Sections 2) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.C: Revise the development plan package and the Title Block to include the descriptions for all of the Common Areas that are proposed. Since the proposed subdivision is a Flexible Lot Development it shall be noted in the Title Block. 3) AM Sec.2-06.4.2.D: Revise the development plan package to remove the extra sheet within the package. Both plan sets include an extra Sheet 8, remove. 4) AM Sec.2-06.4.7.A.6: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note to read per the referenced section for the overlay(s) applicable to the site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.5.4, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 5) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.C: Revise the development plan package to clearly label all Common Areas on the site plan sheet. Specifically Common Area "D" needs to be clearly shown at all locations and all common areas need to be enclosed with a solid line. 6) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to meet the minimum street design standards located within TSM Sec.10-01 or provide a TSMR application with justification for any proposed modifications. Specifically the sidewalk areas on each side of the street at all locations; vertical or wedge curbing along the reach of the roadways where a concrete header is being proposed; the reduced width of the required 24-foot wide roadway; the 12-foot width of the street that accesses Hedrick Drive; etc. Per TSM Sec.10-01.1.1 the project must coordinate street improvements, both public and private so as to compose a convenient system and avoid undue hardship to adjoining properties. 7) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to verify if the proposed streets meet the geometric design for dead end streets per TSM Sec.10-01.6.2.B. For the use of permanent dead-end streets the street must be less than 150 feet in length and must be approved by municipal services such as fire, refuse, and the postal service. 8) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label all on-street parking spaces with the required dimensions per UDC Article 7, Sec.7.4.6.D.2.c and TSM Sec.10-012.4.A. The proposed on-street parking must be approved by the Traffic Engineer. 9) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.H.1: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the proposed driveway setback from the adjacent driveway along Hedrick Drive per Chapter 25 of the Tucson Code Sec.25-38. It appears that there is an existing driveway located to the east of the property that may interfere with the driveway location for this project. The reduction of the 18-foot curb return to 5-feet will require a TSMR application and approval from TDOT. 10) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.I: Revise the development plan package to show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site. Since the development plan package is being prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat street dedication in accordance with the Major Streets & Routes Plan may be required for Park Avenue. Provide written approval from TDOT Planning if street dedication will be required at the Final Plat submittal. If the dedication is required revise the development plan package to show the new half right-of-way width for Park Avenue with all associated improvements. 11) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.J: Revise the development plan package and the future right-of-way detail to correctly dimension the 6-foot sidewalk width that is required for MS&R streets. 12) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 13) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.R: Revise the development plan package to provide a pedestrian access path to all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas. Per TSM 7-01.3.3.B the areas within the development which must be connected specifically verify how the pedestrian access is connected to the proposed refuse containers at all locations and through out the development. 14) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required 6-foot wide sidewalk within the Park Avenue right-of-way. Per TSM Sec.10-4.1.A.1.a the proposed sidewalk width along a Collector street shall be 6-feet. 15) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.S: Revise the development plan package to label and dimension the required handicap access ramps per Pima Count/City of Tucson Standard Detail for Public Improvement, within the right-of-way at all street intersections where located at sidewalk intersections. 16) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide for centralized onsite solid waste and recycle collection service pick up per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.A. The plan set must clearly show both solid waste and recycle collection and be clearly delineated on the site plan. If APC are to be used for recycle prior approval from ES will be required and the APC must be screened. 17) AM Sec.2-06.4.9.T: Revise the development plan package to provide a General Note per TSM Sec.8-01.5.1.D to state; "A single property owner, property management company, or home owners association, will be responsible for the management and maintenance of the solid waste collection services and storage area for all development occupants." GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 04/29/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Rezoning case; Subdivision case; Board of Adjustment case; Design Development Option case; Development Review Board (DRB) case; and/or, Any other relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. Residential Subdivisions The landscape border must be recorded as common area and maintained by the homeowners association (HOA) for the subdivision. The subdivision CC&Rs shall reference and require compliance with the maintenance standards in Section 7.6.8, Maintenance. The PDSD Director may allow the recording of a public use easement with the subdivision plat in cases where the standards of this section are the only reason for the creation of an HOA. The public use easement shall require the abutting property owner to install and maintain a landscape border in accordance with the standards in this section. Identify common areas on the landscape plans. 7.7.5. PLANT PRESERVATION STANDARDS A. Plant Preservation Methodologies One of the following four methodologies is required when preparing a Native Plant Preservation Plan for Protected Native Plants on the project site. The applicant must state on the plans and/or in the report which methodology has been chosen. 1. Plant Inventory Methodology The Plant Inventory Methodology is based upon a Native Plant Inventory of all Protected Native Plants in accordance with Section 2-11.4.1.A of the Administrative Manual. The viability and transplantability of Protected Native Plants must be rated according to Section 7.7.5.A.1.b and must be used to determine the numbers and locations of plants required for preservation. Verify that all the protected native plants are inventoried and viability rated accordingly. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 04/30/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 05/01/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer or private sewer collection system, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Indicate on the utility drawing which lots will require the installation of backwater valves. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 05/01/2015 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or planned Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov >>> DSD_CDRC 4/8/2015 8:10 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0055 Existing and Proposed Zoning: R-2 and R-3 |
| 05/04/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Add the general note per TSM 8-01.4.0B specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based upon the calculated waste stream tonnage. Because of the centralized collection proposed for the project, use the multi-family factor in Table 1 in the calculation as it most closely reflects the use for refuse and recycling collection purposes. 2. Show on the plans the turning movement for the service vehicle per the turning template in Figure 7 of TSM Section 8 and the wording in 8.01.5.3.E, demonstrating the maneuverability and turning radius meet the criteria for the service vehicle to back away from the enclosure and then turn into the 12 ft. wide lane to exit. If the turning maneuvers cannot be adequately met, including the necessary 3 ft. clearance from obstructions, provide an onsite turnaround in Common Area “C” per Figure 7 in TSM Section 8. 3. Provide no parking and one way signs on the 12 ft. wide drive with the one way direction being north toward Hedrick Drive. Discuss with the Transportation Dept. the need for the 25 ft. radius at Hedrick since no right turn onto the private drive shall be allowed. A no right turn sign on Hedrick at this intersection may also be required. 4. Show the 14 ft. x 40 ft. clear area in front of each enclosure on the plans as described in TSM 8.01.5.3.B. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 05/04/2015 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 1 OF 15 1. In the general notes, delete all the accessible requirements stated and provide a note complying with the City of Tucson's ordinance # 10463, The inclusive Home Design Ordinance. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/05/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 4/8/2015 8:10 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0055 Existing and Proposed Zoning: R-2 and R-3 Proposed Use: Residential |
| 05/05/2015 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 05/05/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 4 rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 05/05/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/05/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 05/05/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/05/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 05/05/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/21/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |