Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP15-0053
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/31/2015 | SPOWELL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 03/31/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/01/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic engineering has no comment on this submittal and supports the acceptance of the development. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 04/08/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
| 04/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | Please see additional documents in PRO April 9, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Jetts Pantano Rezoning @ Existing ROW Site Improvement Plans - CDRC No. DP15-0053 Dear Ms. Gehlen : Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 2" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Pantano Road and in addition, an existing 1-1/4" gas main with several gas services is located within the property directly north of this project (1060-1122 S. Pantano road). SWG requires a stand-by when the contractor is working within 10 feet of high pressure gas facilities or distribution facilities 6" or greater. The contractor must call (520) 794-6021 to schedule the stand-by a minimum of 24 hours in advance. Information regarding excavator responsibilities when excavating near high pressure or larger-diameter facilities is attached. SWG requests this information be added to the development plans. SWG has valves or test stations located within the project area that will need to be protected and may require adjustment to the final grade. The contractor must contact SWG for adjusting valves boxes at least two weeks prior to the start of construction by calling (520) 794-6208. SWG requests this information be added to the development plans. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner, including payment for conflict mitigation if applicable. Please include SWG in all future development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6194 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Ben De Los Monteros Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information and Excavators Responsibilities (pdf) Saved at U:\ENGR - SHARED\MISC - SHARED\Procedures\SAZ Contact Info |
| 04/09/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/14/2015 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Jett's Pantano Rezoning Development Package (1st Review) DP15-0053 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 15, 2015 DUE DATE: April 24, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 26, 2016. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 1) COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0053, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2) COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 3) COMMENT: Provide the rezoning case number, C9-13-15, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 4) COMMENT: Provide the TRE case number, 2014-024, adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.2.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 5) COMMENT: Identify the Pantano Wash on the location map. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 6) COMMENT: Provide the rezoning case number in General Note 3. Also show the rezoning case number with the conditions of rezoning on sheet 2. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 7) COMMENT: Vehicle display is not a use listed in the UDC. That said remove the reference to vehicle display from General Note 4. The use for the entire site should be listed as Vehicle Sales and Rentals. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 8) COMMENT: Provide a general notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA SEC. 5.4, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE". 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 9) COMMENT: As this site is comprised of two parcels a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request form with you next submittal. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 10) COMMENT: Per development package BK 10 PG 81 there is a 30' sewer easement, DKT 8807, PG 1559 that is not shown on this plan. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 11) COMMENT: Provide the dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks for both 22nd Street and Pantano Road. It appears that some of the required information has been provided for Pantano but the dimensions do not line up with the sidewalk. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 12) COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required along the north parcel line of parcel 2. 13) COMMENT: There is a 24' dimension shown near the southeast corner of the existing canopy. Is this an access lane? If so show that the requirements of UDC Article 7.4.6.E.2 are met. 14) COMMENT: As it appears that there is vehicle access to the parcels to the north provide a copy of the recorded cross access agreement with your next submittal. 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 15) COMMENT: Provide a standard vehicle parking space detail. 16) COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.H Barriers, such as post barricades or wheel stop curbing, are required in a vehicular use area to prevent vehicles from extending beyond the property lines, to prevent cars from damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings, overhanging adjacent sidewalk areas, and/or driving onto unimproved portions of the site. That said some type of barrier is required for the four (4) vehicle parking spaces shown along the east property line. 17) COMMENT: Per UDC Article 7.4.6.D.2.b Minimum Width Requirement When Adjacent to Barrier. A motor vehicle off-street parking space must have a minimum width of ten feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said there appears to be bollards shown on the north and south side of the "ELEC BOX". Demonstrate on the plan that the vehicle parking spaces adjacent to the bollards meet this requirement. 18) COMMENT: The vehicle parking space calculation shows the site area as 33,541 and General Note 2 shows the site area as 38,333, which is correct. If the 38,333 is correct than the vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 19) COMMENT: The provided bicycle details do not match what is proposed on sheet 1. Ensure that the detail addresses UDC Articles 7.4.9.B.1.e & 7.4.9.B.2.d, .f, .g. 2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 20) COMMENT: Provide the height of the existing canopy within the footprint. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 21) COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for all existing on-site sidewalks on the plan 22) COMMENT: Provide width dimensions for the striped pedestrian way shown on the plan 23) COMMENT: It appears that the proposed bicycle parking location encroaches into the minimum width of a required sidewalk. Demonstrate that the minimum sidewalk width is maintained in this area. 24) COMMENT: Per TSM Section 7-01.4.A At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project. That said provide the required sidewalk/pedestrian way to 22nd Street. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 25) COMMENT: Provide written approval from the Department of Transportation that rezoning condition 6 has been met. 26) COMMENT: Provide written approval from the Pima County Assessor's office the rezoning condition 7 has been met. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 27) COMMENT: If applicable show in proposed signs on the plan. Also provide a general note stating "ALL PROPOSED SIGNS TO BE UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT". Additional Comments 28) COMMENT: As you are proposing to use existing right-of-way to meet code requirements, i.e. vehicle parking and use area, provide a future site plan, meeting all requirements of Am 2-06 that shows how the site will meet code at the time of widening. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 04/20/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Approved | Good morning, Pima County Development Services Department finds that the proposed project does not create any adverse impact on the County and therefore offers not comments. Have a great day. Laith Alshami, P.E. Site Review Project Manager Pima County Development Services Building Safety and Sustainability 201 N. Stone Ave. Tucson, AZ 85701 Tel: 520-724-9900 Site@Pima.gov www. dsd.pima.gov |
| 04/20/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 3/31/2015 1:16 PM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Development Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0053 |
| 04/20/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See additional documents in PRO 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#290278 April 8, 2015 Architectural Design Group Attn: David Garcia 2510 E. Grant Road #140 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Mr. Garcia: SUBJECT: Jetts DP15-0053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 6, 2015. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Charles Leon at (520) 918-8707. Sincerely, Denise Burr Administrative Assistant Design Enclosures CC: C. Leon - TEP (DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) |
| 04/21/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Clearly identify property lines for the project. The area on the east side of the project isn't clearly identified as right-of-way, which is how it is identified on the assessor's record maps. Provide recordation information for right-of-way areas and areas of abandoned right-of-way. Clearly identify areas of existing and proposed paved areas. Provide dimensions for sidewalk areas along the right-of-way. Sidewalk with a sub-standard width will need to be widened to 6 feet. Show future sight-visibility triangles. Include the SVTs for the intersection of Pantano Road and 22nd Street. Show drainage patterns for both the existing and proposed development. Show how water harvesting will be maximized. Indicate all landscape areas will be depressed for water harvesting. |
| 04/22/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 04/22/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | April 21, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0053 PROJECT NAME: Jett's Pantano Rezoning PROJECT ADDRESS: 7889 E 22nd Street PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: TDOT requires additional information on the development plan for approval. The following items must be revised or added to the Development Plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-4259 for permit information. Note required on plan.. 2. Show / note existing driveway to be closed and replaced with curb and sidewalk. 3. Dimension width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. Dimension width of turn lane and include bike lane striping, type and width. 4. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. (DS 3-01.0 figure 6) If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/24/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/24/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the site drawing to include the following existing utility information: a. The location, invert and rim elevation of the next upstream manhole along with the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number. b. The point of connection to existing public sewer. c. Any existing or proposed utility easements Reference: City of Tucson Administrative Manual, Section 2-06.4.8D and Section 107.2.1, IBC 2012. |
| 04/24/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Submit a Landscape Plan. Review the required content. AM 2-06.4.9.X 2) Submit an Irrigation Plan. AM 2-10.4.2.C 3) Submit a Rain Water Harvesting Plan. TSM 4-01.3.0 4) Revise the plans to provide screening for the north boundary of the vehicle display lot. UDC Table 7.6.4-I 5) No more than 5 feet of the required landscape border may be located in the public right of way. UDC 7.6.4.C.2.,4 |
| 04/27/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Reqs Change | The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Per TSM 8-01.4.0B, add the note specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1 for the intended use. 2. The site shall provide a recycling service within an enclosure per TSM 8-01.5.1.A and B. A 90 gallon APC can be used for the recycling. An example of an enclosure which incorporates the APC recycling container(s) is shown in Figure 1 of TSM Section 8. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 04/28/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve these plans |
| 04/28/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 04/28/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 04/28/2015 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Reqs Change | Tucson Parks and Recreation Department comments re: Development Plan DP15-0053/Jetts In 2010 Pima County constructed Pantano River Park improvements that overlap the southwest corner of this development. County-maintained plantings and irrigation systems currently exist in this area that should be protected from damage which could be caused by installation of the new landscape construction that is planned as part of this development. Indicate on the development plan that the area of this property that is within ten feet of the county's existing paved multi-use path is to be dedicated to Pima County as a Public Non-Motorized Trail Easement, and remove all planned improvements shown in this area. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/28/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/28/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 04/28/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/18/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |