Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP15-0046
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/07/2015 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/07/2015 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The differential grading process must be complete before the grading plan can be approved. Once the approval letter from the director or his designee is received, neighborhood notification and approval of the mitigation plan may proceed. Provide radii for the knuckles on the roadway to demonstrate conformance with the Technical Standard. Provide details or schematics for the transitions from lot to lot where the grades change significantly, for example between lots 41 and 48. If walls or retaining walls are anticipated, indicate them on the DP and indicate they are by separate permit. |
| 04/07/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Julieann Arechederra GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: March 25, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding Tentative Plat DP15-0046 SCHOOLYARD * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " OUR RECORDS REFLECT TUCSON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 1 AS OWNER, FOR PARCEL 133-04-0170. THE PLAT INDICATES OWNERSHIP TO BE PEPPER VINER COMPANY AT THE SCHOOLYARD LLC. PLEASE PROVIDE THE RECORDING DOCUMENT CONVEYING TO PEPPER VINER COMPANY LLC. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO March 25, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for The Schoolyard - Tentative Plat CDRC No. DP15-0046 Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to as well as within the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, gas mains are located within the rights-of-way of Wrightstown Road, the alley west of the area of development, and within the area of development. Additionally, four existing gas services are located within the area of development. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner. Please include SWG in all future plat and development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician / Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf) |
| 04/07/2015 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No proposed or existing Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are impacted by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/07/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 04/07/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its approval. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 04/07/2015 | FDILLON1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Project requires an Architectural Variation Plan (AVP) per UDC Section 8.7.3.M. Please see note #18 on cover sheet. The Architectural Variation Plan should be prepared in accordance with 2-06.5.3.E, Architectural Variation Plan, outlined in the Administrative Manual. Please submit AVP during building permit stage. FD |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See documents in PRO |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 3/23/2015 9:37 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0046 Existing and Proposed Zoning: RX-1 To R-1 |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 ROBIN FREIMAN ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: ROBIN FREIMAN, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP15-0046 SCHOOLYARD TENTATIVE PLAT - 1ST REVIEW DATE: MARCH 26. 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Please label all plan sheets with project number DP15-0046 ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files. These CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County's Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | SUBJECT: THE SCHOOLYARD LOTS 1-56 DP15-0046 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed and approves the Tentative Plat for The Schoolyard submitted on March 23, 2015. Removal or relocation of existing electrical facilities will be billable to the developer. A preliminary electrical design will be completed on the approved tentative plat and easement requirements for new facilities will be determined. Easements must be shown on the Final Plat in order for TEP to approve the plat. If you have any questions, please contact me at 917-8744. Thank you, Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 04/07/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 04/07/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ELECTRICAL-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Passed | No rezoning condition about lighting |
| 04/07/2015 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | SHEET 2 1. Detail the second FOS as shown on sheet 17. 2. Provide a note for the walkways in both FOS areas: "All accessible route slopes to be 5% maximum running and 2% maximum cross." |
| 04/07/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 04/07/2015 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP15-0046 - FLD 8950 E Wrightstown Road Tentative Plat for "The School Yard" Lots 1-56 and Common Areas A-C TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 24, 2015 DUE DATE: April 14, 2015 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 00. COMMENT: Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 17, 2016. 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 01. COMMENT: This project has been assigned the PDSD Development Package activity number DP15-0046. List the DP number next to the title block of all plan sheets. Lis the rezoning case number next to the title block of the Landscape Sheets. If applicable or if any other application that is related to this project, has been or is processed list the case number next to the title block of all plan sheets. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 02. COMMENT: Review the lot size square footage on sheet two (2). Based on the lot line dimensions labeled, some of the subdivision lot square footages are not labeled correctly. Revise as required. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 03. COMMENT: The grading plan is being reviewed concurrently with the tentative plat. Once the tentative plat is approved, the grading plan is also considered approved. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 04. COMMENT: Draw and label or key note the subdivision boundary building setbacks. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 05. COMMENT: Label the sidewalk and width proposed through Common Area A-2. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 06. COMMENT: Detail "C" on sheet 3 must be revised to correctly indicate the actual width of the area between the future face of curb and future right of way line. The overall dimension is labeled as 10 feet, the dimensions below the overall dimension total 9 feet. Revise as required. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 07. COMMENT: Include with the next DP submittal a separate response memo explain how conditions of rezoning have been addressed. Conditions of rezoning that require drawings be added to the Development package plans or submittal of specific documents must be addressed in the next submittal. Add the requested information on the plan sheets, include the requested documents by related to specific rezoning conditions and detail memo explain how the rezoning conditions have been addressed. ********************************************************************* 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required, in accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 08. COMMENT: See the Landscape reviewer comments related to landscape buffers and screening. ********************************************************************* 09. COMMENT: The following items need to be revised or corrected. On sheet 2, revise the location of one of the keynotes annotated as keynote 11. The keynote for the 1' no access easement along the north subdivision boundary is pointing to the wrong location for the easement and the easement line is drawn in the existing right of way area that is to be dedicated. The 1' no access easement is to be placed along the new north subdivision boundary. Revise the access easement line to the correct location an all sheets. On sheet 3, Detail E, Correct the information for the street setback on the corner lot detail as follows; the setback noted on the corner lot detail states that the setback is noted in key note 6 on sheet two. The key note indicates the setback is measured from the back of future curb, the detail shows the setback being measured from the travel lane. Correct as required. Draw and label the one foot no access easement on detail "E" and cross section "C". Cross section "B" and "D" do not depict parking lanes. Clarify if on-street parallel parking is allowed on either street. If so draw, label and dimension the parking on-street parking lanes on both cross sections. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS) 2-06.5.2 Tentative Plat Required An FLD proposing to subdivide the project site into two or more lots must prepare a tentative plat. Tentative plats for FLDs must be prepared in accordance with Section 2-06.0.0, Development Package, including Section 2-06.5.3, Additional Information, and the following developable area information: 2-06.5.2.A - Provide, by note on the plat, the developable area calculation for the entire FLD; and, 10. COMMENT: Provide the developable area calculation as noted by the standard above. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.2.B - Show the maximum developable area of each lot (i.e., building footprint). 11. COMMENT: The developable area of each lot should be based on the largest model proposed. Add the information as noted by the standard above. (Clarify if the overall site area used in the calculation is based on the area without the area dedicated for right of way.) ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3 - Additional Information The following are required in addition to the requirements of the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable: 2-06.5.3.C - Functional Open Space Delineate the boundaries of the proposed functional open space on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. Provide, by note on the plat, the required and proposed functional open space calculations; 12. COMMENT: Label on plan sheet two (2) the square footage of the functional open space for the area proposed along the west side of the subdivision, if needed, dimension this FOS area. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.D - Building Elevations Provide dimensioned building elevations of all proposed units. The elevations can be preliminary drawings. The model home construction plans will be used to determine exact setbacks and screening requirements at the time of application for building permits; 13. COMMENT: Provide with the next submittal the building elevations as noted by the standard above. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.E - Architectural Variation Plan When applicable, an architectural variation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC as follows: 14. COMMENT: Avenida Recardo Small is considered a Neighborhood Collector Street. Per Section 8.3.7.M.1.b.2, architectural variation plan may be required. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.E.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide architectural variation; and, 15. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.E.2 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and building footprints) demonstrating how the proposed architectural variation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.1 of the UDC. 16. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.F - Privacy Mitigation Plan When applicable, a privacy mitigation plan is required in accordance with Section 8.7.3.M.2.d of the UDC as follows: 17. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.F.1 - Identify on the tentative plat or site plan the lots and/or units that must provide privacy mitigation; 18. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.F.2 - Provide photographs of the site and its interface with the adjacent properties documenting the existing conditions; and, 19. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.F.3 - Provide a written statement and drawings (such as elevations and landscape plans) demonstrating how the proposed mitigation techniques comply with Section 8.7.3.M.2.b of the UDC. The plan should include when practicable additional design elements to increase privacy such as the siting angle of buildings, windows, and lots; 20. COMMENT: If applicable add the information as noted above. See the Design Professional comments related to this standard. ********************************************************************* 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 21. COMMENT: CC&R's may be submitted during the TP review period if available; otherwise they must be provided with the Final Plat submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 04/08/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL SECTION 2-10.0.0: LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIREMENTS Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Calculations Square footage of the site; Square footage of the landscape area and calculation of the required number of canopy trees, percent of vegetative coverage and indicate screening elements. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply. |
| 04/08/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Reqs Change | Please indicate location of proposed fire hydrants. Refer to section 507 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements. |
| 04/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | The Development Plan/Tentative Plat has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services Dept. and is approved. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net From: DSD_CDRC DSD_CDRC [DSD_CDRC.DSPO2.CHDOM2@tucsonaz.gov] Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:39 AM To: kperry@perryengineering.net; Zelin Canchola Subject: Fwd: DP15-0046/Schoolyard |
| 04/09/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/09/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Two rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 04/09/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | Fron TDOT, Zelin Canchola April 9 2015 School Yard TP Show no access easement along alley. |
| 04/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 04/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 04/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2015 | KROBLES1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |