Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP15-0037
Parcel: 99999999A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW

Permit Number - DP15-0037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
09/17/2015 AROMERO4 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
09/21/2015 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Approved Conditions reviewed and approved by CDRC office.
09/22/2015 ZELIN CANCHOLA COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Approved
10/02/2015 ED ABRIGO PIMA COUNTY ASSESSOR Reqs Change Office of the Pima County Assessor
115 N. Church Ave.
Tucson, Arizona 85701

BILL STAPLES
ASSESSOR




TO: CDRC Office
Subdivision Review
City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559)


FROM: Ada Griffin
GIS Cartographer
Pima County Assessor's Office


DATE: October 2, 2015


RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding:

DP15-0037 FRY'S TENTATIVE PLAT (3rd submittal)

_

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements.
___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements.

COMMENTS:


" THERE MUST BE APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. IT IS UNCLEAR IF PAGE 3 IS REFERENCING THE PERIMITER (IF SO, IT IS ONLY A PERIMITER LINE FOR LOT 1, NO DIMENSIONS). NO PERIMITERS REFERENCED FOR REMAINING LOTS. PAGES 9, 10 & 11 REFERENCES 4 LOTS, WITH A PERIMITER LINE OF ONLY LOT 1.

" UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION. OUR RECORDS INDICATE THE OWNERS AS: LANDMARK TITLE ASSURANCE AGENCY OF ARIZONA LLC TRUST NO. 18215

" PAGE 2 (GENERAL NOTES #3) REFERENCES THE NUMBER OF LOTS IS 4. PAGE 4 SHOWS 5 LOTS.






NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED.
10/09/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING HC REVIEW Approved
10/09/2015 ELIZABETH LEIBOLD ENGINEERING REVIEW Approv-Cond TO: Ali Fakih, P.E., SEG
SUBJECT: Development Package Tentative Plat Engineering 3rd Review submittal
PROJECT: Fry's Tentative Plat
LOCATION: 1801 W Valencia Rd, 85746, T15S R13E Sec15, Ward 1
IMPACT FEE AREA: West
FEMA PANEL: 2270L, Zone X-shaded
WATERSHED: WBSCR Diversion Channel Watershed (a Balanced Basin Management Area)
REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM, CFM
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0037
SUMMARY: The resubmittal of this revised Development Package includes the Tentative Plat with conceptual grading information, which was received and reviewed by Planning & Development Services Department Engineering Division. Meeting with engineering consultant occurred on 28AUG15. Development Services Department Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of this Tentative Plat with the remaining minor comments to be addressed.
BASE PLAN / MASTER COVER SHEETS/ GENERAL NOTES:
1) Admin Man Sec.2-06.3: Assure sheet numbering is complete; sheet 10 (Tucson Water Plan sheet) should match sheet numbering system; add "sheet 10 of 21" to lower right of sheet.
DRAINAGE REPORT COMMENT:
2) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Remove the statement on page 2 of the report "it is determined to be outside of the flood hazard zone". Add clarification in report on page 2 that the project is located within a FEMA floodplain zone X shaded, that although this area is not a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), it is considered a jurisdictional 100-year flood hazard area (depths less than 1-foot) as determined by the City of Tucson.
SOILS/GEOTECHNICAL REPORT COMMENT:
3) Tech Man Secs.4-04.2.3.1.6.A.4.d, 4-03.2.2, 2-01, 4-03.III.3.5.1.3.a: Provide an original sealed copy of the soils addenda pertaining to the email regarding soils recommendations for setback from drainage areas.
REZONING RELATED COMMENTS:
4) Tech Man Sec.4-03.4.3.1: Per Rezoning condition, the basin side slopes shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Detention/Retention Manual for human activity zones. Show the locations of 8:1(H:V) or flatter slopes for pedestrian access to the sections of the eastern basin areas.
If you have questions, please contact me at (520)837-4934.
Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM
Civil Engineer
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Dept
Elizabeth.Leibold@tucsonaz.gov
10/09/2015 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Approved
10/14/2015 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Completed
10/15/2015 BVIESTE1 ENV SVCS REVIEW Reqs Change The Development Package has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal:

1. It is acknowledge there is a double enclosure called out for both Lots 3 and 4 in the waste stream calculations and the enclosure for Lot 3 is shown on the Sheet 3. However the access to the enclosure on Lot 3 is inadequate and does not allow the collection vehicle to approach in line with the enclosure per TSM 8-01.5.3.H. Locate the enclosure per Figure 5 in TSM Section 8 for 30 and 45 degree orientations off a PAAL. Show the Lot 4 enclosure on Sheet 3 and call out that it is per the same detail as the enclosure on Lot 3. On both enclosures, show the 14 ft. x 40 ft. clear areas (28 ft. x 40 ft. for a double enclosure) in front of the enclosure per TSM 8-01.5.3.C.

2. Since the refuse and recycling for Lot 2 is to be placed into the containers on Lot 1, provide a covenant stating the owners of Lot 1 will allow the refuse and recycling on Lot 2 to be placed in their containers. This will need to be recorded with language included so that the covenant will run with the land for both lots.

3. Identify the location of the container for recycling for Lot 1 on Sheet 3.

If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net
10/16/2015 BVIESTE1 ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Reqs Change This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items:

1) Two rolled sets of the plans
2) A disk containing all items submitted
3) All items requested by review staff
4) All items needed to approve this plan

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
11/05/2015 EGALLET1 APPROVAL SHELF Completed
11/05/2015 EGALLET1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
11/05/2015 EGALLET1 REJECT SHELF Completed