Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP15-0037
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/11/2015 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approv-Cond | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 721-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP15-0037 FRYS MARKETPLACE LOTS 1-4/TENTATIVE PLAT-2ND REVIEW DATE: AUGUST 13, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. NOTE: ON VICINITY MAP PLEASE CORRECT SECTION CORNERS-- NORTH OF 9 & 10 TO 4 & 3 AND NORTH OF 10 & 11 TO TO 3 & 2. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar of approved Final Plat to City Planning ***PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING MUST RECEIVE A COPY OF THE RECORDED FINAL PLAT PRIOR TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF ANY ADDRESSES. PLEASE COORDINATE THE DELIVERY AND RECORDATION OF THE MYLAR WITH THE CITY OF TUCSON PLANNING*** 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. ***The Pima County Addressing Section can use digital CAD drawing files. These CAD files can be e-mailed to: CADsubmittals@pima.gov The digital CAD drawing files expedite the addressing and permitting processes when we are able to insert this digital data into the County’s Geographic Information System. Your support is greatly appreciated.*** |
| 08/17/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: August 17, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP15-0037 FRY'S TENTATIVE PLAT _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP AND PLAT. " GENERAL NOTES MUST BE ON THE TENTATIVE PLAT AND INCLUDE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0, AND THE BASIS OF BEARING. " THERE MUST BE APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. IT IS UNCLEAR IF PAGE 3 IS REFERENCING THE PERIMITER AND WHERE TO LOCATE THE EXACT LOT LINES FOR LOTS. " UNABLE TO LOCATE ANY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 08/24/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | August 24, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0037 PROJECT NAME: Tentative Plat Store#83 Fry's PROJECT ADDRESS: 1801 W Valencia PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. A left turn restriction (left turns from driveway) onto Valencia by modification of the center turn median will still be required. Show on plan. Any contradicting signs or striping must be adjusted at time of construction. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 08/28/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06: As discussed in our meeting 28AUG15, address the remaining development package Tentative Plat comments: a) >>completed<< b) On cover sheet and sheet L1.0 clarify note 7 to include: ... "at time of construction and prior to inspection." c) Add note per Tech Man Sec.14.3.2 a-d on cover sheet. d) Explain intent as to whether all drainage infrastructure is to be constructed in first phase of development (may be provided in response letter), or whether assurances are to be provided for portions of the drainage infrastructure. It appears that the infrastructure is all needed at initial portion of the development. e) Assure format of the Tentative Plat meets Admin Man Sec.2-06 http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az 2) Tech Man Sec.4-03.3.5.1: Provide soils report recommendations for setback from drainage areas (100-yr flood limits) to assure buildings are setback at minimum distance. Besides pavement structural design, and setbacks, provide results of infiltration testing. (results in soils report should be further discussed in drainage report with regard to safety factor and meeting drain down time). a) Show and label distances on planview sheets for Tentative Plat sheet and preliminary grading sheet. b) Provide legible surveyable limits of floodplain on Tentative Plat sheet. c) Provide bleed pipe from subsurface retention system to outfall area of open drainage channel system. 3) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: address the following drainage related comments for report and plans: a) >>completed<< b) >>completed<< c) Assure all adjacent proposed future buildings have labeled "minimum" FFE listed on Tentative Plat and prelim grading plan sheets. d) Update Tentative Plat sheets to remove any callouts for sheets not provided in this Tentative Plat review. e) Drainage facility maintenance list/description for HOA to use as guidelines, may be provided in revised drainage report at grading plan review stage. f) >>completed<< g) Correct drain down time requirement of 24-hrs, not 36 hours. h) Provide discussion of engineering justification of proposed subsurface retention/detention system and how drainage design meets City of Tucson requirements. i) Add clarification in report that the project is location within a 100-year FEMA floodplain zone X shaded and in an area designated as a TSMS (Tucson Stormwater Management Study) Balanced Basin Management Area, as well as the within the WBSCR (West Branch Santa Cruz River) Diversion Channel Watershed TSMS (BG). If you have questions, please contact me at (520)837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold P.E., CPM, CFM Elizabeth.Leibold@tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/03/2015 | BVIESTE1 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | See additional documents on PRO. 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 September 2, 2015 Sustainability Engineering Group Attn: Ali Fakih 8280 E Gelding Dr, 101 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Dear Ali: SUBJECT: Fry's Marketplace #83 DP15-0037 WR #293669 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 19th, 2015. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. These conflicts are as follows: " Underground cable is in conflict with development " Poles are in conflict with development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer, Jennifer Necas, at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Natalie R Nava Scheduling Coordinator Design/Build Enclosures CC: Jennifer Necas, Tucson Electric Power Company CC: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) |
| 09/03/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Tentative Plat has been reviewed on behalf of the Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal. 1. Previous Comment #1 was not addressed. Please identify the locations of both the recycling and refuse enclosures for the various uses. Per the waste stream calculations provided, there is only one container proposed for each use. Per TSM 8-01.5.1.A., both recycling and refuse collection service must be provided, with the total waste stream calculation divided equally between refuse and recycling per TSM 8-01.5.4.D. 2. The Lot numbers used in the waste stream calculations do not match the lot numbers on the plans. The Lot 3 Restaurant calculation is incorrect. Please use the factor for Retail of 0.0057 in the calculations. The two uses on Lot 3 in the calculations but Lot on the plans can share the refuse and recycling enclosures and containers since they will be under the same ownership. 3. The enclosures need to be located on the lots they serve. There doesn’t appear to be an enclosure on Lot 4. If Lot 2 is to remain its own lot, it needs to have its own refuse and recycling enclosures. 4. Previous comment #3 was not addressed. The single enclosure detail provided on Sheet 2 does not comply with Figures in TSM Section 8 as to cane placement, slab and apron thickness and reinforcement, bollard location, gates, etc. Provide details for enclosures that comply with the standards. Use of double enclosures to provide both recycling and refuse will require the addition of the double enclosure details to the plans. 5. The drive thru restaurant on Lot 3 does not show a drive thru lane on the plans. Show the required 14’x40 clear area on the plans for the enclosure approach per TSM 8-01.5.3.C. Widen the approach drive to the enclosure to the 14 ft. width. Also, show that the maximum backing distance per TSM 8-01.5.3.F is not exceeded after servicing the containers. Consider moving the enclosure closer to the PAAL. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net |
| 09/03/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0037 (C0-07-20 & SE-15-06) [second review] 1801 West Valencia Road Fry's: Large Retail Establishment (LRE) and Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 3, 2015 DUE DATE: September 3, 2015 1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4) COMMENT: Provide the legal description for the proposed plat in the title block. ADDITION TO COMMENT: Create a title block in the lower-right corner that can accommodate the required information on each sheet. 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. 5) COMMENT: Include the number of lots and common areas in the title block. ADDITION TO COMMENT: Provide this information in the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 10) COMMENT: Provide the amended rezoning conditions that shall go before the Mayor and Council on July 7, 2015, as adopted, on the cover sheet of this development package. Also state the conditions for the Special Exception on the cover sheet. ADDITION TO COMENT: Provide the amended rezoning condition on the cover sheet. Provide the newest rezoning conditions. Contact John Beall for updated copies @ John.Beall@tucsonaz.gov and the special exception conditions. Place the special exception on the cover sheet. There are two conditions in Exhibit A that pertain to pedestrian circulation. There should be two pedestrian walkways to Valencia Road (condition # 5). There appears to be only one. The pedestrian circulation along the west property line is incomplete. (See comment # 18.) There is no indication of "distinguishable material" for the pedestrian crossing (condition # 6). ADDITION TO COMMNTS: The rezoning conditions must be provided and complied with on these plans. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14) COMMENT: Provide the typical parking space details for both the standard and physically disabled. ADDITION TO COMMENT: No parking details have been provided. Also there is no Sheet C2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 15) COMMENT: The minimum number of loading spaces required is two (2) Type A for the Fry's. Provide the number required and provided on the plan. Also provide the dimensions as described above. ADDITIN TO COMMENT: No loading space has been provided, and there is no Sheet C2. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16) COMMENT: Provide all of the required bicycle parking information on the site plan. Provide the locations for both the short-term and long-term bicycle parking (UDC Sections 7.4.9.C and 7.4.9.D, also Fig 7.4.9-A). Provide fully dimensioned details in plan view. Provide the information for the bicycle racks, lockers, lighting and security (UDC Sections 7.4.9.C and D). ADDITION TO COMMENT: Short-term bicycle details have not been provided on the plans. (Long-term have been provided on Sheet 2.) Provide references to the details on the site plan. The locations for the bicycle parking have also not been provided on the site plan. These locations must be drawn and dimensioned on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 18) COMMENT: There is an outdoor dining area in front of the Fry's that is blocking pedestrian circulation and refuge. Reconfigure the outdoor seating area to allow safe and accessible pedestrian circulation. Fully dimension the sidewalks and all pedestrian circulation on the plan. (See comment # 10.) The pedestrian circulation and sidewalks are incomplete on the west side of the site along South Valley Indian Agency Road. Delineate and dimension the sidewalks from lot 3 to lot 4 on the plan. ADDITION TO COMMENT: The outdoor dinning area has been removed. Provide all the pedestrian circulation information with dimensions on the site plan. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 19) COMMENT: Dimension the plans for the pedestrian access along the rights-of-way. ADDITIN TO COMMENTS: No information has been provided on the plans. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 20) COMMENT: See comments 10 and 18. Additional comments may be forthcoming relative to the approval of the amending rezoning conditions by the Mayor and Council. THIS STILL APPLIES. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. |
| 09/03/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/03/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Comment appears to not have been addressed. Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve for both buildings when future plumbing activities take place. [Initial comment: For the proposed Shops A, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole SSMH 7 (2476.89') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2477.00'). Similarly, the proposed restaurant building has a first floor elevation (2475.00') that is lower than the downstream manhole (SSMH 11, 2475.27'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve for both buildings when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson.] |
| 09/03/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0037 (C0-07-20 & SE-15-06) [second review] 1801 West Valencia Road Fry's: Large Retail Establishment (LRE) and Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 3, 2015 DUE DATE: September 3, 2015 Provide dimensioned plans with full details demonstrating compliance with the International Code Council's Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities (ICC A117.1-2009) and the 2012 International Building Code Chapters 10 and 11. No information has been provided. Provide the pedestrian circulation information requesting in the zoning review. The minimum information must include: Provide an accessible route from the accessible parking space to the accessible route at the building and to all accessible entrances of the building. Insure and provide a note to that effect, that all accessible route slopes are to comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slopes and 2% maximum cross slopes. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking space showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, markings, grade slopes, accessible parking aisle, signage, van accessible space and access to the accessible route. Provide a large scale sign detail including a van accessible sign. Provide slope directional arrows and slope percentages on the ramp of the new accessible parking. |
| 09/08/2015 | BVIESTE1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 2 rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/17/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |