Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP15-0037
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/15/2015 | AROMERO4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/17/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal, due to the distance from any ADOT facilities, and supports its acceptance. Thank you. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 06/18/2015 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 06/23/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 MICHELENE NOWAKADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: MICHELENE NOWAK, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP15-0037 FRY’S STORE #83/TENTATIVE PLAT- 1ST REVIEW DATE: June 23, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1.Label Project# DP15-0037 on all Sheets.2.Heading should include: Lots 1 – 43.Legal Description/Title Block should read: A Resubdivision of Lots 1-5 of The Shops At Midvale Book 64 of Maps & Plats At Pg 96 being a portion of the Northwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 15 South, Range 13 East . . . . 4.Lot numbers are not consistently numbered on all pages. Please correct lot number labels on Sheet 6.5.Note: 1801 W Valencia Rd is administrative address for entire project.Fry’s address: 1795 W Valencia Rd Proposed Lot 1; Fuel Station address: 1805 W Valencia Rd-Proposed Lot 2; Restaurant address: 1765 W Valencia Rd Proposed Lot 4; Shops Address: 1785 W Valencia Shops Proposed Lot 3 |
| 06/24/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO June 24, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Site Plan for Fry's #83 - Tentative Plat CDRC No. DP15-0037 Dear Ms. Gehlen: Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located in adjacent rights-of-way to the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, an existing 2" gas main is located within the right-of-way of Valencia Road and may be impacted by pavement sawcutting along the northern edge of the development and driveway grading into the development. This main may be utilized for future extension into the proposed development. If public utility easements and/or common areas are to be granted, SWG respectfully requests that dedication verbiage be added to the project general notes, including dedication notes that document the following: " Utility easements allow for the installation and maintenance of both public and private utilities. " Private common areas allow for the installation and maintenance of private underground utilities Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. SWG also requests that no trees be planted within close proximity to gas facilities due to root intrusion; therefore, SWG requires all tree placements have a minimum eight-foot clearance from the tree center line to existing or proposed gas facilities. Shrubs and bushes may be planted within the eight-foot clearance zone. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner. Please include SWG in all future plat and development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or TUCSWGDevReview@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf) |
| 06/24/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0037 (C0-07-20 & SE-15-06) 1801 West Valencia Road Fry's: Large Retail Establishment (LRE) and Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 24, 2015 DUE DATE: July 13, 2015 1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is . 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 2) COMMENT: Provide the legend on the cover sheet. 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 3) COMMENT: Provide the key plan on the cover sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 4) COMMENT: Provide the legal description for the proposed plat in the title block. 2-06.4.2.C - The number of proposed lots and common areas are to be noted. 5) COMMENT: Include the number of lots and common areas in the title block. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 6) COMMENT: Provide the address and the development package number (DP-0037) adjacent to the title block. Also provide the final plat number with the DP number when assigned. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 7) COMMENT: Delineate the projection map so that the subject property is in the center of the map. Provide the additional information below on the adjusted projection map. 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 8) COMMENT: Place the above information on the cover sheet under general notes. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 9) COMMENT: State the existing use as vacant in the general notes. Re-state the proposed use as: Retail Food and Beverage Sales, Large Retail Establishment and Food Service. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 10) COMMENT: Provide the amended rezoning conditions, that shall go before the Mayor and Council on July 7, 2015, as adopted, on the cover sheet of this development package. Also state the conditions for the Special Exception on the cover sheet. There are two conditions in Exhibit A that pertain to pedestrian circulation. There should be two pedestrian walkways to Valencia Road (condition # 5). There appears to be only one. The pedestrian circulation along the west property line is incomplete. (See comment # 18.) There is no indication of "distinguishable material" for the pedestrian crossing (condition # 6). 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. 11) COMMENT: Provide the information for the proposed subdivision. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.E - Wastewater Management Notes List the following notes as appropriate. 12) COMMENT: See comments by Pima County Wastewater Management. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 13) COMMENT: Provide the bearing, with the dimensions, information for the new subdivision lot lines on the plan. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 14) COMMENT: Provide the typical parking space details for both the standard and physically disabled. 2-06.4.9.H.5.c - Show all loading zones, vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route. Provide as a note the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, whether the loading space is a Type A or B as provided in UDC Section 7.5.4. 15) COMMENT: The minimum number of loading spaces required is two (2) Type A for the Fry's. Provide the number required and provided on the plan. Also provide the dimensions as described above. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 16) COMMENT: Provide all of the required bicycle parking information on the site plan. Provide the locations for both the short-term and long-term bicycle parking (UDC Sections 7.4.9.C and 7.4.9.D, also Fig 7.4.9-A). Provide fully dimensioned details in plan view. Provide the information for the bicycle racks, lockers, lighting and security (UDC Sections 7.4.9.C and D). 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 17) COMMENT: See comments by the engineering section. 2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual. 18) COMMENT: There is an outdoor dining area in front of the Fry's that is blocking pedestrian circulation and refuge. Reconfigure the outdoor seating area to allow safe and accessible pedestrian circulation. Fully dimension the sidewalks and all pedestrian circulation on the plan. (See comment # 10.) The pedestrian circulation and sidewalks are incomplete on the west side of the site along South Valley Indian Agency Road. Delineate and dimension the sidewalks from lot 3 to lot 4 on the plan. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 19) COMMENT: Dimension the plans for the pedestrian access along the rights-of-way. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 20) COMMENT: See comments 10 and 18. Additional comments may be forthcoming relative to the approval of the amending rezoning conditions by the Mayor and Council. 2-06.4.9.W - Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to the Sign Code, Chapter 3 of the Tucson Code, is required. 21) COMMENT: All signage shall require separate permits. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 22) COMMENT: See comments by the landscaping review section. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. |
| 06/25/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 6/15/2015 1:54 PM >>> THIS REVIEW HAS BOTH REZONING AND SPECIAL EXCEPTION CONDITIONS Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat/Site Plan review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0037 |
| 07/07/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Reqs Change | July 7, 2015 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP15-0037 PROJECT NAME: Tentative Plat Store#83 Fry's PROJECT ADDRESS: 1801 W Valencia PROJECT REVIEWER: Zelin Canchola TDOT Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Tentative Plat; therefore a revised Tentative Plat is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the plat. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. A left turn restriction (left turns from driveway) onto Valencia by modification of the center turn median will still be required. Show on plan. 2. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved tentative plat is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact Permits and Codes for additional PIA information at 791-4259. 3. The access points shall have 25' radius curb returns. Show on plan. 4. Dimension the width of all ingress/egress points (Tucson City Code, Chapter 25, section 39 & 40) 5. Tucson City Code Chapter 25 Section 25-39 states that the maximum curb cut width is 35 feet, and maximum driveway width at the property line is 30 feet. The plan shows the western driveway along Valencia as 40 feet. 6. List the name, ROW width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 520 837 6659 or zelin.canchola@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/07/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/07/2015 | GLENN HICKS | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No proposed or existing Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this development. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/09/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO No objections/adverse comments. See attached. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disclaimer: This report and/or data was funded in part through grant[s] from the Federal Highway Administration and/or Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. The contents of this report and/or data reflect the views and opinions of the author(s) who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily state or reflect the official views or policies of the U.S. Department of Transportation, the Arizona Department of Transportation, or any other State or Federal Agency. This report and/or data does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. The information in this publication is provided on an “as is” basis, and there are no warranties, express or implied, including, but not limited to, any warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall PAG be liable for any damages resulting from the use of the information. PAG provides the information in good faith and has endeavored to create and maintain accurate data. The users of this report and/or data are advised to use the information with caution and to independently verify accuracy. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler 1 E. Broadway Blvd, Ste. 401 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 495-1455 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagregion.com ekramer@pagregion.com |
| 07/09/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | See additional documents in PRO 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#293669 July 9, 2015 Sustainability Eng. Group Attn: Ali Fakih 8280 E. Gelding Dr. #101 Scottsdale, AZ, 85260 Dear Mr. Fakih : SUBJECT: Site Plan for Fry's DP15-0037 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and does not approve the development plan submitted June 19, 2015. It appears that there are conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. " TEP underground is not shown on development plans. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Jennifer Necas at (520) 918-8295. Sincerely, Patty Lopez Office Support Design Enclosures CC: J. Necas - TEP City of Tucson - DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov |
| 07/09/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0037 (C0-07-20 & SE-15-06) 1801 West Valencia Road Fry's: Large Retail Establishment (LRE) and Tentative Plat TRANSMITTAL DATE: July 9, 2015 DUE DATE: July 13, 2015 Provide dimensioned plans with full details demonstrating compliance with the International Code Council's Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities (ICC A117.1-2009) and the 2012 International Building Code Chapters 10 and 11. |
| 07/10/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1. The presence of manholes in a private sewer collection system will require review of the sewer design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the design to PDEQ at 150 W Congress St, 1st Floor (520-724-7382). A separate plumbing permit from Development Services will be required for construction of the private sewer collection system. 2. For the proposed Shops A, the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole SSMH 7 (2476.89') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2477.00'). Similarly, the proposed restaurant building has a first floor elevation (2475.00') that is lower than the downstream manhole (SSMH 11, 2475.27'). Provide a note on the plans requiring the installation of a backwater valve for both buildings when future plumbing activities take place. Reference: Section 715.1, IPC 2012, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 07/10/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | 1) Admin Man Sec.2-06: Address the following development package comments: a) Add to legend: Vp and Vr on applicable sheets. b) On cover sheet and sheet L1.0 clarify note 7 to include: ... "at time of construction and prior to inspection." c) Add note per Tech Man Sec.14.3.2 a-d on cover sheet. d) Explain intent as to whether all drainage infrastructure is to be constructed in first phase of development (add note to cover sheet), or whether assurances are to be provided for portions of the drainage infrastructure. It appears that the infrastructure is all needed at initial portion of the development. 2) Tech Man Sec.4-03.3.5.1: Provide soils report recommendations for setback from drainage areas (100-yr flood limits) to assure buildings are setback at minimum distance. Show and label distances on planview sheets for Tentative Plat sheet and preliminary grading sheet. b) Provide surveyable limits of floodplain on Tentative Plat sheet. c) Provide bleed pipe from subsurface retention system to outfall area of open drainage channel system, otherwise provide percolation testing results with safety factor showing 24-hr drain down time. 3) Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: address the following drainage related comments for report and plans: a) Add datum for water surface elevations on exhibits in report. b) Add 100-yr WSEL data cross sections along channel and in basin area. c) Assure all adjacent proposed future buildings have labeled minimum FFE listed on Tentative Plat and prelim grading plan sheets. d) Add freeboard labeled on channel sections to show that public pavement structural sections in vicinity of channel are higher than 100-yr WSEL. e) Add drainage facility maintenance list/description for HOA to use as guidelines, in drainage report. f) Add note that post construction percolation testing will be required prior to final grading inspections/approval. g) In drainage report, remove reference to dry wells; City policy does not consider dry wells for design development. No dry wells will be approved for this project. Correct drain down time requirement of 24-hrs not 36 hours. h) Retention was discussed in pre-sub meetings; detention style drainage infrastructure was expected to be submitted for this project, although through report and design retention is proposed. The report indicates a drain down time rate - provide infiltration testing results with soils report that needs to be submitted. There are serious concerns for post-construction hold-up of approvals if retention system hold stormwater beyond drain down time of 24-hrs. Project may be help up until redesign and reconstruction of drainage facilities are completed to show compliance with drain down time. Keep in mind retention may be waived for this project if discussion of engineering justification of subsurface constraint to meet retention requirement is accepted by the City. Call to discuss. |
| 07/13/2015 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the plans and details to clarify compliance with Special Exception condition #22. Provide examples. |
| 07/13/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Reqs Change | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: June 17, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP15-0037/Tentative Plat for Fry's _ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER. IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISION, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP AND PLAT. " GENERAL NOTES MUST HAVE THE GROSS AREA OF THE SUBDIVISION, THE NUMBER OF LOTS, THE NUMBER OF MILES OF NEW ROAD, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EVEN IF THE NUMBER IS 0. " NO OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LISTED. OUR RECORDS INDICATE THE OWNERS AS: LANDMARK TITLE ASSURANCE AGENCY OF ARIZONA LLC TRUST NO. 18215 NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Reqs Change | The Tentative Plat has been reviewed on behalf of Environmental Services Dept. and the following will need to be addressed on the resubmittal: 1. Identify the locations of the refuse and recycling enclosures on the plans. Show that the enclosures are at least 50 ft. from any residential zone or use per the rezoning conditions. 2. Add the general note Per TSM 8-01.4.0B specifying the anticipated method of collection and frequency based on the calculated tonnage from Table 1 for the intended uses. 3. Add the details and required clear areas for the enclosures per the figures in TSM Section 8. 4. Show the access through the site using the turning templates in TSM Section 8. Note: The plans lack adequate information regarding refuse and recycling service and access per the standards in TSM Section 8. Additional comments may be forthcoming with the next submittal. If there are any questions, I can be reached at kperry@perryengineering.net Ken Perry, PE, LEED AP Principal 505 W. Wetmore Road Tucson, Arizona 85705 Office 520.620.9870, ext. 1 Cell 520.820.4355 kperry@perryengineering.net www.perryengineering.net |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 07/14/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES | Passed | Closed excess folder |
| 07/14/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Passed | Review not required for tentative plat/development package. |
| 07/15/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | Pending comments from Tucson Water |
| 07/15/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and reubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 4 rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 07/15/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | See letter in PRO |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/06/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |