Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP15-0032
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2015 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: May 29, 2015 DUE DATE: June 11, 2015 SUBJECT: Latitude Engineering Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Metro TED; Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 744 S Euclid Ave; T14S R14E Sec18 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP15-0032 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 20FEB15). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) Complied. 2) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.3: The relevant Development Plan Package case number (DP15-0032) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. Currently the plan number is not denoted on Sheet 4, revise. 3) Restated: AM Sec.2-06.4.8.F: Revise the development plan package to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site with the Improvement Plan Number in plan view. Per research on the City GIS Map it appears that the adjacent catch basin and 24-inch pipe was constructed under plan # D-68-006. Revise the plan set to include this information in plan view. 4) Complied. 5) Complied. 6) Complied. 7) Complied. 8) Complied. 9) Complied. 10) Complied. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/04/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: D15-0032 (2nd review) 744 South Euclid Avenue Parking and building expansion for precision manufacturing: TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 4, 2015 DUE DATE: June 11, 2015 1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. 2) PROVIDED 3) CORRECTED 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 4) There was no four. 5) PROVIDED 6) PROVIDED 7) PROVIDED 2-06.4.9.H.5.a - Show all motor vehicle off-street parking spaces provided, fully dimensioned. As a note, provide calculations on the number of spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled. The drawing should indicate parking space locations for the physically disabled. A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. For information on parking requirements for the physically disabled, refer to adopted building and accessibility codes of the City of Tucson. Design criteria for parking spaces and access are located in Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC. 2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided. 8) COMMENT: Provide details for the provided long-term bicycle parking. INCOMPLETE: Provide the detail drawings and specifications for the wall mounted long-term bicycle parking. (This information shall also be required in the building plans, when there are submitted.) 9) PROVIDED 10) COMMENT: Continuous pedestrian circulation paths are required with all development (TS 7.01.3.3). INCORRECT: See "A" below and comment eleven. A) The pedestrian path must be connected to all public access areas of the development and to any adjacent streets (TS 7-01.3.3.A). B) "The areas within the development which must be connected include, but are not limited to, all buildings, all bicycle and vehicle parking areas, all recreation areas, all dumpster areas, and all other common use areas" (TS 7-01.3.3.B). C) "Within this pedestrian circulation path, an accessible route is also required in compliance with the city's adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.2). "Pedestrian circulation paths designed for barrier-free accessibility for the physically disabled and located within any development are regulated by the adopted building codes" (TS 7-01.3.3.C). 7-01.4.0 LOCATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS 4.1 Location Standards Sidewalks must meet the following locational requirements: A. At least one sidewalk is required to a project from each street on which the project has frontage, unless there is no vehicular access from a street because of a physical barrier, such as a drainageway or an unbroken security barrier (e.g., a wall or fence). The sidewalk should be located to minimize any conflict with vehicular access to the project; B. A sidewalk is required adjacent and parallel to any access lane or PAAL on the side where buildings are located (See Figure 1); C. A sidewalk is required adjacent to any parking space accessed by a PAAL where the space is located on the same side of the PAAL as any building and no other parking spaces or PAALs intervene (See Figure 2); D. Sidewalks must connect all areas of the development and must also connect to the pedestrian circulation path located along any adjacent street; E. Sidewalks shall be flood free for all storm discharges of up to and including a ten-year frequency flood event. Drainage flowing across all pedestrian circulation paths shall be conveyed under the path for up and including the ten-year frequency flood events, except at street intersections, pedestrian crossings, and PAAL pedestrian crossings; F. Sidewalks or pedestrian refuge areas cannot be located between any motor vehicle parking space and the PAAL providing access to that space; G. Sidewalks or crosswalks cannot cross any type of stacking areas for drive-through lanes; and, H. In Land Use Classes where the public does not have access to certain portions of the site, a four- foot wide pedestrian refuge area must be maintained between any enclosed structure and a PAAL (See Figure 6). 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 11) COMMENT: Provide the pedestrian circulation as described above (2-06.4.9.S) on the site plan for this development package. INCORRECT: The access to both streets must be a sidewalk (7-01.4.1.A). The pedestrian access along the street is presently a vehicle use area, and unless it is completely blocked off, shall continue to be used as such, at least occasionally. Therefore, some separation from the pedestrian refuge and the (potential and continuing) vehicle use area is recommended. In addition there must be barriers, such as a six inch curb, wheel stops or bollards for the pedestrian refuge (sidewalks) adjacent to the vehicle use area in the proposed north parking lot. 12) Acknowledged. 13) Acknowledged. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan. The expansion calculations are based upon the last approved site plan. The calculations are also based upon the last full code site plan. The expansion calculations are cumulative. Provide copies of this submittal with the revised plans and response letter. |
| 06/04/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/09/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved |