Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Permit Number - DP15-0030
Review Name: TENTATIVE PLAT REVIEW
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/27/2015 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/27/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Provide documents of 100 year water supply from Halcoyon Water Co. |
| 03/02/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Reqs Change | 201 N. STONE AV, 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 ROBIN FREIMAN ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 724-9512 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: ROBIN FREIMAN, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: SP15-0030 TENTATIVE PLAT FOR GOLLOB LOTS 1 AND 2 DATE: MARCH 2, 2015 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Label all sheets with project number DP15-0030 2. Title block on all sheets needs correct spelling of "Halcyon Acres" 3. Sheets 1 & 2: Label Gollob Road as Public 4. Sheets 1 & 2: Correct abutter reference to the east of subject parcels - Halcyon Highlands Estates (1-13) BK 35, PG 37 |
| 03/02/2015 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | Regional Traffic Engineering has no comments on this submittal and supports its approval. Thank you. Lawrence Bigelow, MBA, MSMC Traffic Studies Analyst 1221 S. 2nd Avenue Tucson, AZ 85713 Office: (520) 388-4228 Cell: (520) 310-6909 lbigelow@azdot.gov -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| 03/03/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | SOUTHWEST GAS | Approved | See additional documents in PRO March 3, 2015 City of Tucson CDRC Attn: Patricia Gehlen, Manager 201 N. Stone Avenue Tucson, AZ 85701 RE: SWG Plan Review for Gollob Lots 1 & 2 CDRC No. DP15-0030 Southwest Gas Corporation (SWG) has no objection to the development of the above-mentioned project. Existing natural gas facilities are located within the area of development and may be affected by construction of this project; specifically, two 1" gas service lines are located within the 30' ingress and egress easement described on sheet C2 of 5 of the supplied plans. The two 1" gas lines are shown on sheet C4 of 5 of the supplied plans and may be affected by grading of the easement. Additionally, a gas main is located within the right-of-way of Gollob Road for future extension into the proposed development. Blue Stake and potholing are suggested for best accuracy when locating SWG facilities. Please be aware that a minimum of 30" of cover should be maintained over the two 1" gas services within the area of development. Also, SWG requires a minimum one-foot separation from distribution facilities and any proposed structures and two-foot separation from high pressure gas facilities. SWG requests the contractor use caution when working in the vicinity of gas facilities and protect and support gas facilities per Blue Stake requirements. All information is provided for reference use only. Please note that it is the responsibility of excavators or those developers planning excavation to verify actual field conditions in advance of construction so that requests for gas service or any potential issues can be addressed in a timely manner. Please include SWG in all future plat and development plan submittals of this project. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (520) 794-6218 or Art.Lason@swgas.com. Sincerely, Arthur Lason Engineering Technician /Southern Arizona Division Enc: SWG Contact Information (pdf) |
| 03/03/2015 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/03/2015 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Approved | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Ada Griffin GIS Cartographer Pima County Assessor's Office DATE: March 3, 2015 RE: Assessor's Review and Comments Regarding: DP15-0030 - Tentative plat for Gollob * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * X Plat meets Assessor's Office requirements. _______ Plat does not meet Assessor's Office requirements. COMMENTS: " THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTAL NOTE: THE ASSESSOR'S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 03/16/2015 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | On Pg. C2 DTL "A" fire lane sign please use detail in 2012 IFC modifications section 503.3 (also spacing) |
| 03/17/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | POLICE | REVIEW | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept. 1100 S. Alvernon Tucson, AZ 85711 520-837-7428 >>> DSD_CDRC 2/27/2015 11:52 AM >>> Dear Reviewers: This is an electronic distribution for a CDRC Tentative Plat review. If you normally receive paper copies of the review documents, you will receive them soon. The applicable case numbers are: CDRC Development Plan: DP15-0030 Existing and Proposed |
| 03/17/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | See documents in PRO |
| 03/25/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Comments: ES approves for automated plastic containers (APC's) for curbside refuse and recycle collection services, within the private driveway, to proposed lots 1 & 2, with one condition. Condition: The private driveway must be maintained by the property owners in order to insure safe and clear access throughout. Deterioration of the driveway due to non maintenance may require APC's to be placed out and collected from Gollob Rd. Thanks, Andy Vera City of Tucson Environmental Services Accounts Representative Supervisor Office (520) 837-3798 Fax (520) 791-4156 e-mail: Andy.Vera@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/25/2015 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/26/2015 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Identification and Descriptive Data All improvements and site information, such as adjacent rights-of-way and property lines, shown on the landscape plan will be identical in size and location to those shown on the base plan (site plan or tentative plat). Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. The landscape plan will contain the following identification in the lower right corner of each sheet: Any relevant case number for reviews or modifications that affect the site. The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100 CFS or more will be drawn on the development package documents 2-06.4.9.N 6. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/26/2015 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/26/2015 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Reqs Change | SUBJECT: GOLLOB LOTS 1 & 2 – TENTATIVE PLAT DP15-0030 Tucson Electric Power Co. (TEP) has reviewed the Tentative Plat for Gollob Lots 1 & 2 and is unable to approve the plat at this time. Existing TEP easements must be shown on the Site Plan. Easement information has been provided to Perry Engineering. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 917-8744. Mary Burke Right of Way Agent Tucson Electric Power Co. Mail Stop HQW603 PO Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 Office - 520-917-8744 Cell - 520-401-9895 mburke@tep.com |
| 03/26/2015 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | No existing or proposed Tucson Parks and Recreation facilities are affected by this plat. Howard B. Dutt, RLA Landscape Architect Tucson Parks & Recreation (520) 837-8040 Howard.Dutt@tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/26/2015 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Michael St Paul Planning Technician PROJECT: DP15-0030 489 South Gollob Road Tentative Plat for RX-1 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 26, 2015 DUE DATE: March 27, 2015 1) COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Unified Development Code, The Administrative and Technical Manuals were addressed. This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Development Package Standards listed in section 2-06 of the City of Tucson Administrative Manual. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC). The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above 1. Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is . 2. SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS) Section 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.1.0 GENERAL 2-06.1.1 PURPOSE This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews. The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property. This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes. 2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review. 2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided. The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application: 2-06.2.1 Application Form A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee; 2-06.2.2 Development Package A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein; 2-06.2.3 Related Reviews In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the; 2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and, 2-06.2.5 Fees Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule. 2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.3.1 - Each sheet shall measure 24 inches by 36 inches and include a minimum one inch margin on left side and one-half inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping. A larger sheet format may be used with the approval of the Planning and Development Services Department (PDSD). 2-06.3.2 - All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than 50 feet to the inch. This scale is the minimum accepted to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for record-keeping purposes. The same scale shall be used for all sheets within the set. Smaller scales (60:1 or greater) may be used for some or all of the sheets with the prior approval of PDSD when it is determined legibility and the ability to be digitized and/or reduced for archiving will not be affected. 2-06.3.3 - All lettering and text (upper or lower case), and numbering, shall be a minimum of three-thirty-seconds inches in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving. 2-06.3.4 - A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 2-06.3.5 - A three-inch by five-inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 2-06.3.6 - Provide a blank three-inch by five-inch block in the lower right corner of the plan adjacent to the title block on the first sheet of the development package for use by Pima County Addressing. 2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 2-06.3.8 - The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 2-06.3.9 - The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. If it is not practical to orient north to the top of the sheet, the plan drawing shall be oriented with north to the left side of the sheet. 2-06.3.10 - A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. 2-06.3.11 - A key plan (if provided) shall be located on the first sheet. 2-06.3.12 - An index of sheets in the development package shall be provided on the first sheet. 2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS 2-06.4.1 - The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. The applicable registration or license number shall be provided if prepared by or with the assistance of a registered professional, such as a surveyor, architect, landscape architect, or engineer. All sealing shall be consistent with Arizona Board of Technical Registration guidelines. 2) COMMENT: Provide the email address for the owner/developer and the consultants. 2-06.4.2 - The title block shall include the following information and be provided on each sheet: 2-06.4.2.A - The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name; 2-06.4.2.B - A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat; 2-06.4.2.D - The page number and the total number of pages in the package (i.e., sheet xx of xx). 3) COMMENT: The sheet numbering must be continuous throughout the entire set of drawings. 2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. 2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information. 2-06.4.4.A - Show the subject property approximately centered within the one square mile area; 2-06.4.4.B - Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property; and, 2-06.4.4.C - Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2-06.4.5 - When the development package documents consists of more than one sheet, a sheet index (a legible drawing of the site showing the area represented on each sheet) is to be placed on the cover sheet or the second sheet. 4) COMMENT: The sheet index must also be for the entire set of plans. 2-06.4.6 - If the project is located within the boundaries of a Planned Area Development (PAD) zone, include a reduced-scale map of the PAD on the first sheet, indicating the location of the portion being developed. 2-06.4.7 - General Notes The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. 2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes 2-06.4.7.A.1 - List as a general note: "Existing zoning is ____." 2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage. 2-06.4.7.A.3 - If the plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is ____." List the applicable rezoning file number and conditions of approval. Also place the C9-__-__ (if applicable) and the plan/plat file numbers in the lower right corner of each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses. 5) COMMENT: The proposed use is for a single-family residence (SFR) on each lot. The zone is RX-1 with the Use Specific Standards 4.9.7.B.6, .8 & .9 (UDC Use Table 4.8-1). Add the code reference and use Specific Standards on the cover sheet with the use. The minimum interior lot setback for residential use to a residential zone is twenty (20) feet (UDC Table 6.3-1.A). Correct the setbacks on the plans. 2-06.4.7.A.5 - On residential projects, list the total number of units/lots proposed. 2-06.4.7.A.6 - If a plan or plat is prepared in conjunction with other applications or overlays or the parcel being developed is subject to conditions of an application processed previously, additional information must be added to the plan. Such applications and overlays include, but are not limited to: annexations; rezonings; special exceptions; Board of Adjustment variances; Design Development Options; Technical Standard Modification Request; overlays (Airport Environs Zone, Environmental Resource Zone, Gateway Corridor Zone, Hillside Development Zone, Historic Preservation Zone, Major Streets and Routes, Rio Nuevo District, Scenic Corridor Zone, WASH); Modification of Development Regulations through the Downtown Area Infill Incentive District or Rio Nuevo District; Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; or, Design Review Board. Provide the following information on the plan. 2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any. 2-06.4.7.A.6.b - If there is more than one lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the additional applications or overlay zones. 2-06.4.7.A.6.c - If the property includes Protected Riparian Area add a note stating that the project is designed to comply with Technical Manual Section 4-02, Floodplain, WASH, and ERZ Standard, specifying all lots impacted and including a total for the regulated area and the Protected Riparian Area. 6) COMMENT: A Riparian Area crossed the northeast corner of this site. See comments by landscaping and engineering. 2-06.4.7.A.7 - If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the case number in the lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note, indicate whether the project is part of a Flexible Lot Development (FLD), condominium, or another similar type project. 7) COMMENT: Provide the subdivision and development package case number in the lower-right corner of each sheet. 2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide: 2-06.4.7.B - Drainage Notes List the following notes as appropriate: 2-06.4.7.B.1 - List the following notes on all plans/plats: "The developer, any successors and assigns, will hold the City of Tucson, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from any and all claims for damages related to the use of this development as shown hereon, now and in the future, by reason of flooding, flowage, erosion, or damage caused by water, whether surface flood or rainfall." 2-06.4.7.B.2 - If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks. 2-06.4.7.B.2.a - "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." 2-06.4.7.B.2.b - "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. 2-06.4.7.B.3 - List the following note on all development package documents: "Drainage will remain in its natural state and will not be altered, disturbed, or obstructed other than as shown on this site plan." 2-06.4.7.C - Streets and Roads Notes 2-06.4.7.C.1 - List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 2-06.4.7.C.2 - List the following note on all development package documents: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with Section 10-01.5.0, Sight Visibility, of the Technical Standards Manual." 2-06.4.7.C.3 - Provided the following notes as applicable: 2-06.4.7.C.3.b - "Total miles of new private streets is ____________." 8) COMMENT: Add the private streets note as streets not driveway. 2-06.4.7.D - Utilities Note All development package documents are to include the following note: "Any relocation or modification of existing utilities and/or public improvements necessitated by the proposed development will be at no expense to the public." 2-06.4.7.E - Wastewater Management Notes List the following notes as appropriate. 2-06.4.7.E.1 - If public sewers are proposed, the following notes will appear on the plan/plat, as applicable. 2-06.4.7.E.1.a - The following notes will be placed on all plans/plats. 2-06.4.7.E.1.a.1 - "On-site sanitary sewers will be public and will be designed and constructed to Pima County Wastewater Management Department Standards and must be accepted and released for service by Pima County Wastewater Management prior to the issuance of sewer connection permits." 2-06.4.7.E.1.a 2 - "A project Construction Permit must be secured from Pima County Wastewater Management before beginning any work on this project." 2-06.4.7.E.1.b - The following note will be placed on all plans/plats in instances where off-site sewer construction is required: "The required off-site public sanitary sewer line will be designed and constructed to Pima County Wastewater Management Department Standards." 2-06.4.7.E.1.c - The following note will be placed on all plans/plats in instances where off-site augmentation is required: "The required off-site public sanitary sewer augmentation will be designed and constructed to Pima County Wastewater Management Department Standards." 2-06.4.7.E.1.d - The following note will be placed on all plans/plats if the proposed project is a commercial or industrial project: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, or as amended." 2-06.4.7.E.2 - The following notes will be provided on the plans/plats if private sewers are proposed for construction on the property. 2-06.4.7.E.2.a - "On-site sanitary sewers will be private and will be constructed, operated, and maintained on a private basis. The location and method of connection to an existing public sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval by the Pima County Wastewater Management Department at the time of submittal of plumbing or building plans." 2-06.4.7.E.2.b - "A property owners' association will be formed to accept responsibility and liability for construction, maintenance, operation, and control of all private sewers." (This applies only if there is more than one lot within the development.) If no homeowners' association is being formed, use the following note: "Maintenance and operation of the private sanitary sewer to its point of connection to the public sanitary sewer is the responsibility of each and every property owner within this development." 2-06.4.7.E.3 - The following note shall be placed on a plan/plat proposed for commercial or industrial use: "Any wastewater discharged into the public sanitary sewerage system shall meet the requirements of Pima County Ordinance No. 1991-140, as currently amended." 2-06.4.7.E.4 - The following note will be provided if public and private sewers are proposed for construction or if public sewers are existing: "On-site sanitary sewers, except public sewers within public sewer easements or rights-of-way, will be private and will be constructed, operated, and maintained on a private basis. The location and method of connection to an existing public sanitary sewer is subject to review and approval by the Pima County Wastewater Management Department at the time of submittal of plumbing or building plans." 2-06.4.7.E.5 - The following note will be provided on the development review documents if private disposal systems will be provided: "Sewerage disposal for lots ____ through ____ will be by private individual disposal systems. Conceptual approval by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality for private individual disposal systems will be obtained prior to approval of the development package documents." (In the case of a one lot development, delete " . . . for lots ____ through ____ . . . " on the first line.) 2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 2-06.4.8.B - All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided. 2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 2-06.4.8.D - The following information regarding existing utilities shall be provided: the location and size of water wells, water pumping plants, water reservoirs, water lines, fire hydrants, sanitary and storm sewers, including the pipe diameter and the invert and rim elevations of all manholes and cleanouts; the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD) reference number; locations of gas lines, electric and telephone lines, poles, and communications cables, on-ground junction boxes, and street lights. If water mains and sewers are not located on or adjacent to the tract, indicate the direction, distance to, and sizes of those nearest the property. Identifying the locations of all utilities and service equipment immediately adjacent to the project is especially important in situations where pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation or landscaping can be in conflict. By knowing the location of the existing utilities, design of the project can take those elements into consideration and can help avoid expensive and time-consuming relocation of utilities, major redesign, or requests to vary regulations after commencement of construction. 9) COMMENT: Provide all the utility information above (2-5.4.8.D) relevant to this site and proposed subdivision. 2-06.4.8.E - Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 2-06.4.8.E.1 - For land that slopes less than approximately 1%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than 100 feet apart in all directions. 2-06.4.8.E.2 - For land that slopes between approximately 1% and 5%, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than two feet. 2-06.4.8.E.3 - For land that slopes more than 5%, contour line intervals shall be drawn at five-foot intervals. If the property is subject to the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ), the contour lines are to be drawn at intervals which satisfy the specific requirements of the HDZ and Section 9-01.0.0, Hillside Development Zone, of the Technical Standards Manual. 2-06.4.8.F - Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. 2-06.4.8.G - Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained." 2-06.4.8.H - Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainage-ways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. 2-06.4.8.I - Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of 100 cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. 2-06.4.8.I.1 - Where natural flood-prone areas, such as washes, channels, drainage-ways, etc., exist within the development document boundaries of the drawing, water surface contours for the 100-year flood with water surface elevations indicated must be shown and clearly labeled. 10) COMMENT: A wash crosses this site on the northeast corner. See engineering comments. 2-06.4.8.I.2 - The linear distance between water surface contour intervals should not exceed 200 feet unless prior agreement has been made with the City Floodplain Engineer or designee. 2-06.4.8.I.3 - A symbol identical to that used to represent the water surface contour intervals on the development package documents should be included in the legend. 2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. 2-06.4.9.A - Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. 2-06.4.9.B - Identify each block or lot by number within the subdivision boundary and include the approximate square footage of each, or a note may be provided stating that all lots comply with the minimum lot size requirements. 2-06.4.9.D - Delineate proposed Natural Undisturbed Open Space (NUOS) in a surveyable manner. 11) COMMENT: See comments by the landscaping reviewer. 2-06.4.9.E - Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) Land splits require a separate permit and review. 2-06.4.9.F - All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications. The basis for this requirement is that some zoning requirements on a project are based on the zoning classification of adjacent property. Also, in some instances, each zone has to be taken into consideration on property that is split by two or more zoning classifications, as each may have different requirements. 2-06.4.9.H - Proposed Traffic Circulation 2-06.4.9.H.1 - Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), accessible ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and accessible ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. Please be aware that, if a new street is created (for other than for subdivisions) which divides the property into two or more lots, a subdivision plat is required (refer to the definition of subdivision in Section 11.4.20 of the UDC). 12) COMMENT: See street paving standards for the private street (TS 10-01) and comments by the engineering section. 2-06.4.9.H.2 - Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 2-06.4.9.H.3 - Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 13) COMMENT: See comments by the Fire Department's reviews. 2-06.4.9.H.4 - Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 2-06.4.9.H.7 - If streets are proposed, indicate if they are designed for on-street parking to accommodate visitor parking or if parking is provided in common parking areas. Visitor parking is to be evenly distributed and usable by all residents of the project. Extra parking on individual lots, such as tandem parking in driveways, does not count toward visitor parking, as it is not available to other property owners within the project. Design criteria for streets are located in Technical Standards Manual Section 10-01.0.0. Streets designed at the minimum width, without on-street parking, need clearance for access to all homes by life safety vehicles and, where no alleys are provided, by refuse collection vehicles. If motor vehicles are parked along streets that are not designed to allow for parking, life safety services will be inhibited and, in many situations, blocked. 14) COMMENT: There must be full access that meets the street standards for all lots in and to the subdivision (UDC Sections 7.8.2, 7.8.3 and 7.8.4). The proposed driveway and easement does not provide proper pedestrian and vehicle access to any of the four single-family residences (SFRs) on this driveway. Full access to all SFRs shall be required. Also provide visitors' parking. See code requirements below: 7.8.2. ACCESS REQUIRED - SUBDIVISIONS All subdivisions must provide a minimum of one legal, all-weather access connection to all lots in conformance with Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. If the proposed all-weather access connection is located outside the subdivision boundary, then the applicant must include assurances for financial participation in the offsite improvement. A. All subdivisions developed in phases must be designed to provide legal access of sufficient size for vehicular and pedestrian access to all phases of the development. B. Any proposed subdivision being divided from a larger piece of property must assure legal access of sufficient size to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to that portion of the property not included in the proposed subdivision. 7.8.3. ACCEPTABLE TYPES OF ACCESS A. Public street access, which is ingress-egress to a parcel provided by an abutting public street. B. Private street access, which is ingress-egress to a parcel provided by an abutting private street in which the owner of the parcel has a legal interest to assure perpetual use for access 7.8.4. WIDTH OF ACCESS A. The minimum width required for access to a parcel is that dimension sufficient to provide for the type of access. The minimum required width is based on access improvements being centered within the dimension. If the improvements are located off-center, an additional width may be required. B. All lots shall be designed with access to a public street. If a proposed lot does not have public street frontage, access must be provided by means of a private street or an access easement of sufficient size to accommodate motor vehicle and pedestrian access and public services as required for the type of development proposed for the lot. C. If access is provided by an easement and the easement serves more than two single-family homes the City may require the easement to be developed as a street or as a parking area access lane (PAAL). The determination as to whether a developed street or PAAL is required will be made at the time of review of the proposed land division or development of the property based on the need for public services, such as utilities, refuse collection, and fire suppression, and on the projected average daily traffic (ADT) of the access easement. 7.4.6. MOTOR VEHICLE USE AREA DESIGN CRITERIA B. Location 2. Parking for Certain Residential Uses a. Individual Residential Lots Visitor parking spaces on individual residential lots are permitted under the following conditions: (1) At least one visitor parking space is provided on each residential lot within a project site; (2) The visitor parking space is at least eight and one half feet by 18 feet in size; and, (3) The designated visitor parking space(s) is shown on the tentative plat or site plan, whichever is applicable. 2-06.4.9.I - Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half, to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. 2-06.4.9.J - If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 2-06.4.9.L - All proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. The easements may have to be recorded and the recordation information added to the development package prior to approval. 2-06.4.9.M - Grading Plan 15) COMMENT: See comments by the engineering concerning grading. 2-06.4.9.M.1 - A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The PDSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. 2-06.4.9.M.2 - Concurrent Review. For all projects, grading plans may be included in the development package and will be reviewed concurrently. 2-06.4.9.M.3 - Tentative Plats - Non Concurrent Review. A separate grading plan may be submitted after the second resubmittal of the tentative plat; however, the grading plan cannot be approved unless it is conformance with an approved tentative plat. Note: In the case of a tentative plat submitted in conjunction with a rezoning request, the tentative plat and grading plan cannot be approved until 30 days after adoption of the rezoning ordinance. See Section 3.5.3.K.6, Ordinance Effective Date, of the UDC. 2-06.4.9.N - In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 2-06.4.9.N 1 - Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. 2-06.4.9.N 2 - Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 2-06.4.9.N 3 - Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings and pipe culverts. 2-06.4.9.N 4 - Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 2-06.4.9.N 5 - Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) 2-06.4.9.N 6 - The 100-year flood limits with water surface elevations for all flows of 100 cfs or more will be drawn on the development package documents. 2-06.4.9.N 7 - Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or on-site runoff discharge points. 2-06.4.9.O - All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. 2-06.4.9.P - The following Pima County Wastewater Management information will be indicated on the development package documents. 16) COMMENT: See comments by Pima County Wastewater Management. 2-06.4.9.S - Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Section 10-01.0.0, Street Technical Standards, of the Technical Standards Manual. 17) COMMENT: See comments by engineering. 2-06.4.9.U - Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. 2-06.4.9.V - For gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. 2-06.4.9.X - Show compliance with landscaping and screening requirements by locations, material descriptions, and dimensions. Specific plant or hardscape material shall be detailed on a landscape plan. A detailed landscape plan is required. In accordance with Section 2-11.0.0, Landscape Plan Requirements. 18) COMMENT: See comments by the landscaping review section. 2-06.5.3.G - Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions 2-06.5.3.G.1 - Provide three copies of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) regarding the homeowner's association's responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of commonly-owned property. 19) COMMENT: Provide the CC&Rs is there are any. 2-06.5.3.G.2 - Provide two copies of the protective covenants or common use agreements for any shared areas being established by easements over individually-owned property. 20) COMMENT: The private street should require protective covenants. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Michael St. Paul, (520) 837-4959. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package site plan and any requested documents. Provide copies of the previous plans and copies of the new plans. Also provide your response comments. |
| 03/27/2015 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Tech Man Sec.4-04.2.3.1: Provide revised Drainage Statement that includes discussion of Camino Seco Wash at proposed entrance area. Include analysis, cross sections, depth of flow, velocity, design for scour protection, fill, and all weather access for driveway entrance. Show on plans Q100 entering and exiting site at all floodplain locations. Show on plans any proposed erosion protection design with any header curb, and material for driveway area. If fill is needed to meet AWA, provide encroachment analysis for pre- & post development conditions. - E Leibold P.E. |
| 03/27/2015 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Completed | |
| 03/31/2015 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 03/31/2015 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) 4 rolled sets of the plans 2) A disk containing all items submitted 3) All items requested by review staff 4) All items needed to approve this plan |
| 03/31/2015 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/31/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | EL PASO NATURAL GAS | Passed | |
| 03/31/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | U. S. POST OFFICE | Passed | |
| 03/31/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | UTILITIES | CENTURYLINK | Passed | |
| 03/31/2015 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/11/2015 | AROMERO4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |