Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP15-0027
Parcel: 13704135F

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP15-0027
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/04/2015 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
03/20/2015 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Reqs Change CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Fluoresco Services
Development Package (1st Review)
DP15-0027

TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 20, 2015

DUE DATE: March 31, 2015

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with a detailed response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments were addressed.

This plan has been reviewed for compliance with the Unified Development Code (UDC) Administrative Manual (AM) Section 2-06. Also compliance with applicable development criteria for the proposed use as listed in the City of Tucson Uniform Development Code (UDC) and the UDC Technical Standards Manual (TSM).

The review comments include the actual standard first with the applicable Administrative Manual section number and the following paragraph is the actual comment related to the specific item that must be addressed. If you need to review the sections listed below click on the link or copy it in the address bar of your internet program. http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/Arizona/tucson_az_udc/administrativemanual?f=templates$fn=default.htm$3.0$vid=amlegal:tucson_udc_az

This link will take you directly to the section used for the standards review. The UDC & TSM requirements are in the Unified Development Code and can be viewed at the same web link as above

Section 3.3.3.G.5.c UDC, An applicant has one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a site plan that complies with zoning and other development requirements in effect at the time of application, unless an ordinance adopted by Mayor and Council during this period states otherwise. A site plan application that has been in review for a period of one year and has not yet been approved is considered denied. To continue the review of a site plan for the property, a new site plan must be submitted that complies with regulations in effect at the time of re-submittal. The new submittal initiates a new one-year review period. One year Expiration date is March 02, 2016.

SECTION 2-06.0.0: DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE (TENTATIVE PLATS AND SITE PLANS)
Section

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.2.0 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.0 CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.5.0 FLEXIBLE LOT DEVELOPMENT (FLD) - ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

2-06.1.0 GENERAL

2-06.1.1 PURPOSE
This standard has been prepared for the purpose of informing applicants of the submittal and review requirements for development package documents to assure proper and adequate information is presented in a consistent manner, thereby providing the basis for an efficient and timely review. The development package documents are prepared in support of applications for building permits and related reviews.

The information that is requested establishes the basis upon which the project will be approved and could affect what is required of the property in the future, should there be a proposal for expansion or for a different use of the property.

This standard does not waive any applicable city regulations or codes.

2-06.1.2 APPICABILITY
This standard shall be used for all site plans and tentative plats submitted to PDSD for review.

2-06.2.1 APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Development Package applications are available from PDSD. Completed applications and accompanying materials shall be submitted to PDSD. Incomplete or inaccurate applications will not be accepted, nor will any application in which the pre-application conference or neighborhood meeting requirements have not been met. The types of documents and the specific number of copies required of each of the documents are on the PDSD website or may be obtained from PDSD. Resubmittals of development packages require a comment response letter that details how all previous comments have been addressed. Provide the same number of copies of the comment response letter as plans provided.
The following documents and information shall be submitted upon application:

2-06.2.1 Application Form
A completed application signed by the property owner or authorized designee;

2-06.2.2 Development Package
A development package must be prepared to the format and content requirements described herein;

2-06.2.3 Related Reviews
In addition to the plan process, a project may require review for other types of plans and documents. The applications for those processes are submitted to the appropriate department for review and approval. These related reviews can be applied for so that review can occur concurrently with the development package application. However, it must be understood that, should the related application be approved subject to conditions or denied, this may affect the;

2-06.2.4 Concurrent Reviews
The development package is designed to allow for concurrent review of any site related reviews. Concurrent review means that all plans and documents needed for the review are submitted as one package. Examples of site related reviews include but are not limited to: site plans, landscape plans, NPPO plans, water harvesting plans, grading plans, SWPPP plans, floodplain use permits, and overlay reviews. Separate applications are often required for the different site related reviews even if the plans are submitted concurrently; and,

2-06.2.5 Fees
Fees in accordance with Section 4-01.0.0, Development Review Fee Schedule.

2-06.3.0 FORMAT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.3.7 - A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

1. COMMENT: The location of the pro-location map does not meet the requirements of this section.

CONTENT REQUIREMENTS

2-06.4.3 - The administrative street address and relevant case numbers (development package document, subdivision, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet.

2. COMMENT: Remove the address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

3. COMMENT: Provide the development package case number, DP15-0027, adjacent to the title block on all sheets.

2-06.4.4 - The project-location map to be located on the first sheet of the development package in the upper right corner, shall cover approximately one square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of three inch equals one mile, and provide the following information.

4. COMMENT: Provide the scale of the location map.

2-06.4.7 - General Notes
The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable.

2-06.4.7.A - Zoning and Land Use Notes

5. COMMENT: Remove the reference to "EXISTING OCCUPANCE and TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION" from the development package as they are not applicable.

2-06.4.7.A.2 - List the gross area of the site/subdivision by square footage and acreage.

6. COMMENT: As a general note list the gross area of the site by square footage and acreage.

2-06.4.7.A.4 - Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the UDC. List all UDC sections applicable to the proposed uses.

7. COMMENT: Provide the use specific standards for general manufacturing, 4.9.5.C.2, .6, .7, & .8 and 4.9.13.Q, with the use shown on the plan.

2-06.4.7.A.6.a - List additional applications and overlays, by case number (if applicable), in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the type of application processed or overlays applicable, a statement that the project meets the criteria/conditions of the additional application or overlay, the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval, if any.

8. COMMENT: Provide a general note on the cover sheet stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA, UDC ARTICLE 5.4 MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES SETBACK ZONE (MS&R)."

2-06.4.7.A.8 - For development package documents provide:

2-06.4.7.A.8.a - Floor area for each building;

9. COMMENT: There are numerous storage containers shown on the most current aerial photos that are not shown on the last approved plan. If these containers are to remain shown them on the plan and account for the square footage in the vehicle and bicycle parking calculations and in the expansion calculation.

10. COMMENT: There are numerous shade structures, awnings, shown on the most current aerial photos that are not shown on the last approved plan. Provide permitting documentation or show them on the plan to be permitted.

11. COMMENT: There is a paint booth shown on the plan directly east of building Provide permitting documentation or the paint booth to be permitted.

2-06.4.7.A.8.c - Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included; and,

12. COMMENT: Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. This calculation should be cumulative, i.e. include the prior paint booth and any storage containers that are to remain on site.

2-06.4.8 - Existing Site Conditions
The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within 50 feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of 50 feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided.

2-06.4.8.A - Provide site boundary/subdivision perimeter information, including bearing in degrees, minutes, and seconds, with basis for bearing noted, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system.

13. COMMENT: As the proposed site is made up of three (3) parcels, 137-04-135F, 137-04-171L & 137-04-171N, a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Combo Request from with you next submittal.

2-06.4.8.C - The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

14. COMMENT: Remove the reference to the abandoned 20' alley from the plan.

2-06.4.9 - Information on Proposed Development
The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes.

2-06.4.9.H.5 - If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Section 7.4.6, Motor Vehicle Use Area Design Criteria, of the UDC.

15. COMMENT: Provide a PAAL width dimension from the required 4' pedestrian refuge near the northwest corner of the "EXISTING PAINT BOOTH" to the proposed parallel vehicle parking spaces.

2-06.4.9.H.5.d - Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned. For specifics, refer to Section 7.4.9, Bicycle Parking Design Criteria, of the UDC. Provide, as a note, calculations for short and long term bicycle spaces required and provided.

16. COMMENT: Detail 2 sheet 2 remove the reference to "CLASS I" from the plan as it is no longer applicable.

2-06.4.9.Q - Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s).

17. COMMENT: Provide the square footage and the height for all structures on the plan, this includes the paint booths and storage canopy.

2-06.4.9.R - Show on-site pedestrian circulation and refuge utilizing location and the design criteria in Section 7-01.0.0, Pedestrian Access, of the Technical Standards Manual.

18. COMMENT: Clearly delineate the required 4' pedestrian refuge area around the "EXISTING PAINT BOOTH.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package & approved Pima County Comb form.
03/24/2015 PATRICIA GEHLEN PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Passed
03/25/2015 CPIERCE1 FIRE REVIEW Passed Passed per Ernie Duarte. Comments to be addressed separate from this DP application.

1) Please indicate location(s) of existing/proposed fire hydrants, with dimensions to property lines. Refer to section 503 of the 2012 International Fire Code for spacing requirements.
2) From our records, it appears that the propane tanks were permitted and installed in 2002, but the final inspections were never called in. The permit has since expired. New plans will need to be submitted, the permit will need to be renewed, and final inspections performed.
3) Annual sprinkler inspections and 5 year check valve inspections are required by code. Our records indicate the last inspection was performed in 2003. Please obtain required inspections, and submit results to the fire department.
Ken Brouillette
03/27/2015 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Reqs Change Expansion of existing development, as provided below:

1. Buildings Greater Than 10,000 Square Feet
On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than 10,000 square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows:

a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the standards of this section apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning standards in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval.

b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991, cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the standards of this section apply to the entire site.

Provide expansion calculations.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

Additional comments may apply
03/27/2015 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
03/31/2015 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Reqs Change Any new pedestrian circulation pathways required by zoning shall be accessible and comply with the 2009 ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% maximum running slope and 2% maximum cross slopes.

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
06/18/2015 AROMERO4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed